Evaluation of Semi-rigid and Flexible Catheters for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants

August 27, 2021 updated by: Lorenz Auer-Hackenberg, Salzburger Landeskliniken

Evaluation of Semi-rigid and Flexible Catheters for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome - A Randomized Controlled Trial

The overall aim of this study is to determine the differences between two surfactant administration catheters in preterm infants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this single-center, open-label, randomized-controlled trial, preterm infants requiring surfactant administration after birth, using a standardized minimal invasive protocol, were randomised to two different modes of endotracheal catheterization: Flexible Ch-4 feeding tube inserted using Magill forceps (group 1) and semi-rigid catheter (group 2). Primary outcome was duration of laryngoscopy. Secondary outcomes were complication rate and vital parameters during laryngoscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • Salzburger Landeskliniken

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm infants born less than 37 weeks of gestation
  • Treating physician in charge of admission decides to administer intratracheal surfactant via standardized institution- LISA protocol (regardless of this study) (see Supplement file 1)
  • Written informed consent signed by caregivers or legal representative to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in study or not providing written informed consent by caregivers/parents
  • Treating physician decides to use different route of surfactant administration or does not adhere to LISA protocol.
  • Rupture of membranes (ROM) at less than 22 weeks of gestation or more than 6 weeks before birth
  • Estimated birth weight < 3rd percentile using 2013 Fenton growth trajectories
  • Twins with feto-fetal transfusion syndrome (FFTS) and FFTS being the cause of premature delivery
  • Contraindications listed in the LISAcath® or Nasogastric Tube manual (esophageal/pharyngeal varices or other vascular lesions, esophageal/pharyngeal tumor, nasal fracture, skull fracture, known allergy to material)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nasogastric Tube
Laryngoscopy, intratracheal catheter placement and surfactant administration
Experimental: Lisacath
Laryngoscopy, intratracheal catheter placement and surfactant administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Successful intratracheal tube Placement
Time Frame: Birth to 24 hours after birth
Birth to 24 hours after birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Wald, MD, Assoc. Prof., Paracelsus Medical Private University Salzburg, University Clinic of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Division of Neonatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatology

Clinical Trials on Surfactant Administration

Subscribe