Implementing LISA Surfactant in Nigeria

August 22, 2025 updated by: Osayame Ekhaguere, Indiana University

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Nigeria

Implement surfactant (BLES®) replacement therapy using the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration technique in six tertiary institutions in Nigeria and evaluate its impact on 72-hour neonatal mortality in premature infants born less than 2000 grams at birth.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) accounts for ~45% of all in-hospital neonatal mortality. Surfactant use is limited in LMICs, in part, due to the high cost, the lack of skill to perform laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, and perhaps a perception that surfactant administration and mechanical ventilation must occur together. In LMICs, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is often the highest mode of respiratory support available, and CPAP failure invariably means death. If Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) can reduce CPAP failure, as shown in high-income settings, it potentially can reduce prematurity-related neonatal mortality in LMICs. There are, however, no studies on how to safely implement LISA in LMICs. The LISA procedure is novel in LMICs; the procedure is not without risk (severe and minor), laryngoscopy is a difficult skill to acquire, master, and maintain, and the resource limitations in LMICs need consideration while implementing LISA.

Hypothesis: Compared to a historical control, introducing non-invasive surfactant administration through the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) techniques will result in a relative risk reduction of all-cause 72-hour in-hospital mortality by at least 20%.

PICO Outline:

Population: Preterm infants </= 2 kg with respiratory distress defined by a Downes Respiratory Distress Score of >4, who are spontaneously breathing, and on CPAP.

Intervention: Surfactant administered through the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), technique.

Comparator: A historical control of preterm babies </= 2 kg with respiratory distress defined by a Downes Respiratory Distress Score of >4, who are spontaneously breathing, and on CPAP.

Outcome measures:

Primary Outcome: 72-hour all-cause in-hospital mortality.

Secondary outcomes

  • All-cause in-hospital mortality
  • Change in respiratory distress score, pre- to -post interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

349

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Enugu, Nigeria, 11111
        • University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital
    • Delta State
      • Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria, 11111
        • Federal Medical Center Asaba
    • Edo State
      • Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria, 11111
        • University of Benin Teaching Hospital
    • FCT Abuja
      • Garki, FCT Abuja, Nigeria, 11111
        • National Hospital Abuja
    • Kano
      • Zaria, Kano, Nigeria, 11111
        • Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital
    • Lagos
      • Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria, 11111
        • Lagos University Teaching Hospital.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 hour to 2 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns with birth weight between 500-2000 grams (determined by birth weight or admission weight if birth weight is unavailable).
  • ≤48 Hours old at recruitment.
  • Spontaneously breathing but have clinical signs of respiratory distress (defined by Anderson Silverman Score (ASS) ≥4 (range 0-10)) and on CPAP.
  • Admitted to the neonatal/newborn units (or special care nurseries).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any newborn intubated before admission to the neonatal/newborn units.
  • Any newborn infants with a significant congenital abnormality
  • Any preterm infant considered nonviable by the managing clinician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LISA Arm
Eligible subjects who have respiratory distress syndrome (Anderson Silverman Score >4) managed on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will receive surfactant via a thin catheter while on CPAP.
Laryngoscopy is performed, and BLES® surfactant is administered through BLEScath™ (a thin catheter) into the trachea to a spontaneously breathing preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome who is being managed on CPAP
Other Names:
  • BLES® Surfactant
  • BLEScath™
  • Less Invasive Surfactant Administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
72-hour mortality
Time Frame: 72 hours of life
All cause mortality with 72-hours of life
72 hours of life

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Through hospitalization, an average of 1 day to 10 weeks.
All cause mortality during hospitalization
Through hospitalization, an average of 1 day to 10 weeks.
Difference in RDS score before and after the procedure.
Time Frame: 6 hours post procedure
Change in Anderson Silverman RDS Score before and after intervention (range: 0 to 10)
6 hours post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Osayame A Ekhaguere, MBBS, MPH, Indiana University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

On request and approval from local principal investigators and ethical approval committee

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Surfactant

Subscribe