Effects of Low Dose Aspirin in Bipolar Disorder (The A-Bipolar RCT)

January 27, 2025 updated by: Lars Vedel Kessing

Despite currently available treatment, a large proportion of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) suffer from affective symptoms, impaired psychosocial and cognitive function. Inflammation seems to be involved in the pathogenesis of BD and preliminary data suggest that low-dose Aspirin may have beneficial effects. The objective of this RCT is to investigate whether add on of low dose aspirin versus placebo add on to standard drug treatment improves mood stabilisation and other critical patient outcomes in patients with BD and whether its principal effects are antimanic, antidepressant or prophylactic against relapse.

randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial will investigate whether augmentation with low dose Aspirin to standard drug treatment improve mood stabilization.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

BD is increasingly conceived as a multisystem disorder with pathophysiologic abnormalities involving inflammation, oxidative stress imbalance, neurotrophic deficiencies and telomere shortening. Specifically, inflammation has been confirmed to be involved in the pathogenesis of BD. Emerging yet compelling data converge to suggest that aspirin may protect against the onset and deterioration in BD. Nevertheless, a pragmatic large scale RCT is needed to for a conclusive risk-benefit analysis of aspirin and to clarify its therapeutic role at the different clinical stages of BD.The investigators propose to include smartphone-based self-assessment of mood as the primary outcome measure in the RCT. Thus, during the last ten years, the investigators have developed and tested a unique smartphone-based system, the Monsenso system, for monitoring, diagnosing and treating BD.

The trial is designed as a two arm, parallel randomized trial with randomisation 1:1 to add on of low dose aspirin (Hjertemagnyl 150 mg/day) versus add-on of placebo to current treatment and with stratification according to age (< 30 years) and gender. The trial is planned and will be conducted in concordance with the CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Patients will be included from The Copenhagen Affective Disorder Clinic, which is a mood disorder clinic providing treatment service for patients with newly diagnosed/first episode BD from the entire Capital Region of Denmark covering a catchment area of 1.6 million people and all psychiatric centres in the region. The Clinic receives more than 300 patients with newly diagnosed BD each year.

we wish to test the following hypotheses: Adding LDA versus placebo to standard drug treatment for BD will reduce 1) mood instability (MI), and 2) other critical outcomes such as activity instability and severity of depression.

Finally, we hypothesize that the reduction in MI is higher in patients with systemic inflammation at baseline indexed with the biomarkers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), IL-6, and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Psychiatric Center Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bipolar disorder (type 1 or 2), with diagnoses confirmed by SCAN interview.
  • Age 18-65 years
  • Habile (i.e. able to give informed consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic kidney disease with GFR 0-10 ml/min
  • Severe cardiac insufficiency (NYHA IIIb-IV)
  • History of gastric ulcers, gastro-intestinal bleeding or other pathological bleeding tendency (thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, vitamin K deficiency)
  • Asthma or other allergic symptoms developed after intake of salicylates, paracetamol or other NSAID or any of the excipients
  • Patients already on aspirin or other NSAID, anticoagulants or SSRIs.
  • For fertile females:

    • Reluctance to use effective contraception during enrollment, including a safety period of one week following last medication day/trial completion
    • Pregnancy; pregnancy ruled out by HCG test before enrollment
    • Breastfeeding
  • Planned major surgery during trial period. If a subject has scheduled major surgery (i.e. with bleeding risk), enrollment will be postponed until this is completed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
125 BD participants will receive placebo. Patients, clinicians and researchers will be blinded for the intervention
Oral tablet: calcium, 1 tablet/day
Active Comparator: Active
125 BD participants will receive active treatment. Patients, clinicians and researchers will be blinded for the intervention
Oral tablet: acetylsalicylic acid,150 mg, 1 tablet/day
Other Names:
  • Aspirin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily self-reported mood instability
Time Frame: 6 months (12 months for a subgroup of participants)
Daily self-reported mood instability collected via the Monsenso system
6 months (12 months for a subgroup of participants)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Changes between baseline score and score at 6 months-follow-up
Depressive symptoms assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-6 items (min. value = 0; max. value = 22, with higher values reflecting more depressive symptoms)
Changes between baseline score and score at 6 months-follow-up
Daily self-reported activity instability
Time Frame: Changes between baseline score and score at 6 months-follow-up
Daily self-reported activity instability collected via the Monsenso App
Changes between baseline score and score at 6 months-follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Automatically smartphone-generated data
Time Frame: 6 months
Level of physical activity measured by an accelerometer, social activity expressed as numbers of outgoing and incoming calls and text messages/24h, and time spent on the smartphone
6 months
Cognition
Time Frame: Changes between baseline score and score at 6 months-follow-up
Cognition is assessed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up according to the clinician-administered Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry tool.
Changes between baseline score and score at 6 months-follow-up
Manic symptoms
Time Frame: Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Manic symptoms assessed by the Young Mania Rating Scale (min. value = 0; max. value = 60, with higher values reflecting more manic symptoms)
Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-rated sleep quality
Time Frame: Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-rated sleep quality assessed by completion of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. This questionnaire does not use a predefined scale.
Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
General functioning
Time Frame: Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
General functioning assessed by the Functional Assessment Short Test, a 24-item interviewer-administered interview concerning autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time (min. value = 0; max. value = 72, with higher values reflecting poorer function)
Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-rated perceived stress level
Time Frame: Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-rated stress level assessed by completion of Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, a 10-item questionnaire. (Min. value = 0; max. value = 40, with higher values reflecting increased stress level
Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-rated quality of life
Time Frame: Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-rated quality of life assessed by completion of the WHO Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire. (Min. value = 9; max. value = 45, with higher values reflecting better quality of life)
Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months
Self-reported hours of sleep
Time Frame: 6 months
Daily self-reported hours of sleep collected via the Monsenso-App.
6 months
Hair cortisol
Time Frame: Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Exploratory outcome: systemic cortisol levels measured expressed by hair cortisol
Changes between baseline levels, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Dysbiosis and short-chain fatty acid levels
Time Frame: Difference between the two treatment arms at 6 months follow-up
As an exploratory outcome, stool samples will be analyzed to investigate the effects of LDA on dysbiosis and short-chain fatty acid levels
Difference between the two treatment arms at 6 months follow-up
Blood-based biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6 months follow-up
As an exploratory outcome, we plan to measure the following blood-based biomarkers: hsCRP, cytokine profiling using mesoscale technology and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) as markers of different aspects of inflammation; malondialdehyde, a marker of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress; brain-derived neurotrophic factor
Changes between baseline and 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Trials on Calcium

Subscribe