An Adaptive Walking Intervention to Manage Chronic Pain in Veterans With Opioid Use Disorder Engaged in Opioid Agonist Treatment

February 2, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Severe chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) occur at significantly higher rates in Veterans compared to the general population. Chronic pain often persists despite engagement in opioid agonist treatment (OAT), the first line treatment for OUD. Recent VA guidelines strongly recommend non-pharmacologic treatment for chronic pain, but individuals with OUD are frequently excluded from pain treatment studies. There is a need for evidence-based pain treatments that compliment OAT for Veterans with chronic pain and OUD. In this study, the investigators will determine feasibility and acceptability for a behaviorally focused pain treatment that includes pain education and a pedometer assisted adaptive walking program for Veterans receiving OAT for OUD. Potential treatment outcomes will be repeatedly assessed using a mobile device, and study-provided pedometers. By offering pain treatment within OAT clinical care, the investigators hope to decrease stigma and increase access for Veterans with chronic pain and OUD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed study will address the pain treatment knowledge gap in Veterans with opioid use disorder (OUD) by piloting a behaviorally-based walking pain treatment for Veterans with chronic pain and OUD. Steps to Change (S2C) is a pain-focused treatment comprised of brief weekly 30-45-minute treatment sessions held over four consecutive weeks within the a Veterans Health Administration opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clinic. To date, no study has evaluated a pedometer-assisted walking program in individuals with chronic pain and OUD engaged in OAT. Topics for S2C include biopsychosocial pain education, pacing activities, benefits of physical activity, and an adaptive walking program derived from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP) modules. The control will be matched for treatment exposure and attention. Veterans in both conditions will be provided a pedometer to record daily step counts as an objective measure of physical activity. Importantly, pain is a dynamic process that is known to vary over time and context. Veterans in both conditions will complete ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys, where behavior is repeatedly sampled using a mobile device.

The study objectives align closely with the description of a Stage IB pilot trial. Stage IB research determines feasibility and pilot testing of an adaptation or refinement of an existing intervention. Walking is a core component of CBT-CP and physical activity has a strong evidence base as a pain treatment for individuals with chronic pain; however, a walking program for chronic pain has not been evaluated in Veterans with chronic pain and OUD receiving OAT. Aim 1 will determine feasibility of study procedures including randomization, retention, fidelity, and proposed study outcomes of S2C and control conditions. Evaluating the feasibility of treatment and best practices for how quickly Veterans can be screened, consented, and randomized to start treatment is a critical step to inform a larger Stage II efficacy trial. In addition, the investigators will evaluate treatment attendance and retention in both S2C and control conditions to determine feasibility as well as discrimination of conditions for fidelity. The investigators will also collect data on mobile phone ownership and compare EMA survey response rates between conditions to inform future efficacy studies. The investigators expect that treatment attendance, retention, and survey responses for S2C will be equal to or superior then control. Aim 2 will establish acceptability of S2C and health education control by assessing intervention credibility and satisfaction at post-treatment. The investigators expect that Veterans in both conditions will report treatment as credible and satisfying. Finally, Aim 3 will evaluate preliminary evidence for whether S2C, compared to control, reduces pain interference assessed via interference items on the PEG. Primary endpoint will be at post-treatment, but the investigators will also evaluate durability or sleeper effects on pain interference at 3- and 6-month follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516-2770
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet DSM5 criteria for OUD and receiving stable (i.e., unchanged in 2 weeks) dose of OAT (i.e., buprenorphine or methadone) in VACHS outpatient addiction clinic
  • Report high impact or bothersome chronic pain defined by experiencing pain on most days or every day in the past 3 months that limits general activity or enjoyment
  • Self-reported ability to walk 1 block
  • Access to a mobile phone with active data plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated major psychiatric disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder)
  • Current (i.e., past month) active suicidal ideation
  • Substance use disorder requiring inpatient detoxification
  • Currently engaged in CBT for chronic pain treatment
  • Planned surgical intervention for pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Steps 2 Change (S2C)
Participants randomized to S2C will be scheduled for 30-45 minute weekly treatment sessions held over four consecutive weeks in the outpatient OAT clinic. Veterans will be expected to increase their average step counts by 10% over their prior week's average. Session 1 will provide pain education including a discussion the biopsychosocial treatment model for chronic pain and benefits of activity. Session 2 and 3 will emphasize benefits of low impact physical activity and introduce activity pacing to address pain related to cycles of over activity and subsequent sedentary behavior. Session 4 will help develop a treatment plan to continue walking and identify possible barriers to meeting goals.
Session 1 will provide pain education including a discussion the biopsychosocial treatment model for chronic pain. Session 2 and 3 will introduce a progressive walking program with individual goals and weekly step count benchmarks and introduce activity pacing to address pain flare ups caused by cycles of over activity and subsequent sedentary behavior. Veterans will be expected to increase their average step counts by 10% over their prior week's average starting in Session 2. Session 4 will help develop a treatment plan to continue walking and identify possible barriers to meeting goals.
Active Comparator: Control
Participants randomized to control will be scheduled for 30-45 minute weekly treatment sessions held over four consecutive weeks focused on problems associated with MOUD, substance use, and general self-management strategies. Importantly, group will explicitly avoid talking about pain coping skills and setting goals for daily step targets.
The control will be matched for treatment exposure and individual attention. Treatment discussion will explicitly avoid problems associated with MOUD, substance use, and general self-management strategies. Importantly, group will explicitly avoid talking about pain coping skills and setting goals for daily step targets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Treatment retention measured as the number of attended sessions (0-4; higher number is better)
Up to 5 weeks
Acceptability
Time Frame: After the first session, on the same calendar day
Credibility measured using the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire with separate scores for credibility and expectancy (3-27; higher number is better).
After the first session, on the same calendar day
Fidelity
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Fidelity measured as clinician adherence and competence in delivering study interventions using the Yale Adherence and Competence System (1-5; higher number is better).
Up to 5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 0-5 weeks
Pain interference measured using the average difference from baseline to post-treatment of two interference items on the PEG3: "What number best describes how pain is interfering with your life?" and "What number best describes how pain is interfering with your general activity?" (0-10; lower number is better)
0-5 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 3-month and 6-month follow up
Pain interference measured using the average difference from baseline to follow-up of two interference items on the PEG3: "What number best describes how pain is interfering with your life?" and "What number best describes how pain is interfering with your general activity?" (0-10; lower number is better)
3-month and 6-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: R. Ross MacLean, PhD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data that underlies published reported results after deidentification (text, tables, figures, appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

9 months to 36 months after publication of primary findings.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Up to 36 months after publication of primary findings, de-identified data can only be used for research purposes with a priori hypotheses including secondary analyses and/or meta-analysis combined with other datasets. Proposals should be directed to robert.maclean@va.gov.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Control

Subscribe