- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05076799
Effect of Lactulose and/or Polyethylene Glycol Solution for Bowel Preparation for Colonscopy Procedures
December 29, 2022 updated by: Lin Cai, Sichuan University
Effect of Lactulose and/ or Polyethylene Glycol Solution for Bowel Preparation in Colonscopy: a Multi-center Prospective Randomized Study
Colonoscopy is the most useful exam used to evaluate colorectal diseases, like colorectal polyps and cancer.
The appropriate bowel preparation is indispensable for colonoscopy procedures.
Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) is the most frequent laxative medication.
However, the taste is poor, and patients need to drink a lot of liquids to obtain adequate visualization of the mucosal surface.
In fact, no laxative has all the characteristics of an ideal medication.
Lactulose is an osmotic laxative which widely used in cirrhosis and constipation patients, and could inhibit bacterial in the colon to increase colon cleanliness and prolong the effect time of PEG.
Previous study demonstrate PEG combined with lactulose has a significant improvement in the quality of bowel preparation compared with PEG alone.
The present study aim to assess the efficacy of lactulose with or without PEG in bowel preparation to improve mucosal visualization, reduced volume of fluid consumed, and preparation intolerance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
This study will conduct in 5 clinical central.
1000 participants who were scheduled for colonoscopy age between 18 and 80 years were enrolled in the study.
Exclusion criteria were patients with uncontrolled acute or recurrent chronic intestinal infections, with active gastrointestinal bleeding or gastrointestinal stricture or intestinal obstruction, with severity coronary heart disease or heart failure or renal failure and liver failure or severe electrolyte metabolism disorder, with pregnant or lactating or metal diseases or refuse to colonoscopy examination.
Central stratification and block randomization is achieved via a computer-generated random-sequence table by using R software.
The participants will be assigned into one of four groups at a ratio of 1 : 1, and received a single 3 L dose of either PEG or 200ml dose of lactulose, 100ml lactulose combined with 1L PEG, 100ml lactulose combined with 2L PEG.
The following parameters were then obtained: time of the first defecation, defecation frequency, the overall drink liquid volume, the taste of the preparation, the tolerance evaluation, the cleansing quality of the bowel preparations and adverse reaction.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
200
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chendu, Sichuan, China, 610014
- West China Fourth Hospital of Sichuan University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants who were scheduled for colonoscopy age between 18 and 80 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- uncontrolled acute or recurrent chronic intestinal infections
- active gastrointestinal bleeding, gastrointestinal stricture, intestinal obstruction
- severe electrolyte metabolism disorder, severe coronary heart disease, heart failure, renal failure or liver failure
- pregnant, lactating, have metal diseases or refuse to colonoscopy examination
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 3 L Polyethylene glycol solution group
The participants were instructed to consume 3000 mL of PEG solution
|
the participants were instructed to consume 3000 mL of PEG solution
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 100 ml lactulose combined with 1 L PEG group
the participants were instructed to consume 100 ml lactulose combined with 1000 mL of PEG solution
|
the participants were instructed to consume 100 ml lactulose combined with 1000 mL of PEG solution
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 100 ml lactulose combined with 2 L PEG group
the participants were instructed to consume 100 ml lactulose combined with 2000 mL of PEG solution
|
the participants were instructed to consume 100 ml lactulose combined with 2000 mL of PEG solution
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 200 ml lactulose group
the participants were instructed to consume 200 ml lactulose
|
the participants were instructed to consume 200 ml lactulose alone
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The quality of bowel preparation
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
to assess the quality of bowel preparation by using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
The minimum score value is 0,and the maximum value is 9.
A higher score means a better outcome.
Bowel cleansing was scored by the endoscopist performing the colonoscopy in the single-blind method.
|
up to 12 months
|
|
The preparation intolerance
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
to assess the preparation intolerance including the palatability of the bowel-cleansing agents, the general satisfaction with the bowel preparation, the willingness to perform another colonoscopy by using case report questionnaire.
Moreover, the ratio of drink all preparation fluids and the specific amount of bowel preparation fluid are documented.
|
up to 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The colorectal diseases detection rate
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
the cecal intubation time, colonoscopy perform time, and polyp detection rate or colorectal cancer detection rate are recorded.
|
up to 12 months
|
|
The adverse events
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
the adverse events including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and other adverse reactions after administration are evaluated.
|
up to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: juan liao, PhD, West China Forth Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 30, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
November 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 29, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
October 13, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 2, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 29, 2022
Last Verified
December 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Sichuan U
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy
-
Borland-Groover ClinicValley Medical Products, LLC is paying for the study and is the sponsor....CompletedColonoscopy | Screening Colonoscopy | Surveillance ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityNot yet recruitingColonoscopy | Colonoscopy Preparation | Colonoscopy Preparation Outcome | Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
-
Josue AliagaCompleted
-
Endostart srlCompleted
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityCangzhou Central Hospital; Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital; Tianjin... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingColonoscopy | Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownInadequate Preparation for Colonoscopy; Personalized Colonoscopy PreparationIsrael
-
Hospital Central Norte PEMEXCompletedPerformance of Colonoscopy | Tolerance of ColonoscopyMexico
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Palo Alto Health Care System; VA Northern California Health Care SystemCompletedWater Exchange Colonoscopy | Unsedated Colonoscopy | Cap | Colonoscopy PainUnited States
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalCompletedColonoscopy | Intubation Time | Cap-assisted ColonoscopyTaiwan
-
Valduce HospitalCompletedUnsedated Colonoscopy | Warm Water | CO2 ColonoscopyItaly
Clinical Trials on 3 L Polyethylene glycol solution
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompleted
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationTel Aviv UniversityUnknownAnti-Biotic Resistance | Klebsiella PneumoniaeIsrael
-
BayerWithdrawn
-
Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel QuintelaCompletedColonoscopy | Bowel Preparation | Polyethylene Glycol | Lactulose | BisacodylUruguay
-
University of OklahomaCompletedDiabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Changhai HospitalUnknownAdenoma Detection Rate | Bowel Preparation ScaleChina
-
Alcon ResearchActive, not recruiting
-
Tanta UniversityRecruiting
-
Cook County HealthCompletedBowel Preparation for ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Cleveland Clinic FloridaCompletedColon CancerUnited States