A Trauma-Informed Intervention for Positive Youth Development and Teacher Wellness in Rural Montana

June 30, 2023 updated by: Lauren Davis, Montana State University
"A Trauma-Informed Intervention for Positive Youth Development and Teacher Wellness in Rural Montana" is intended to help mitigate stressors that may contribute to poor behavioral and mental health in rural Montana teachers. The immediate goals of this study is to promote student health by supporting teacher wellbeing through a remotely-delivered trauma-informed yoga intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Project Summary: "A Trauma-Informed Intervention for Positive Youth Development and Teacher Wellness in Rural Montana" is intended to help mitigate stressors that may contribute to poor behavioral and mental health in rural Montana teachers. The immediate goal of this study is to promote student health by supporting teacher wellbeing through a remotely-delivered trauma-informed yoga intervention.

Specific Aim: Expansion of previous pilot study to teachers in the southwestern Montana school district.

Methods: To explore scalability to rural communities without access to yoga instructors, we will implement a limited feasibility study of online yoga delivery to classroom teachers. This study will enroll a minimum 30 Livingston teachers (taught trauma-informed yoga via Zoom), twice weekly for 45-minute trauma-informed yoga sessions during the 6-week intervention period. No participants were assigned to the "No Intervention" arm. To measure physical health outcomes, pre, mid-, and post-intervention cortisol testing will be utilized to evaluate any changes in teacher stress levels before and after the program. Heart rate variability will also be assessed for teachers pre, mid-, and post-intervention using the HeartMath Inner Balance PPG sensor and Em Wave Pro Plus software. To assess behavioral health, pre- and post-survey instruments will collect targeted wellness/mental health data from teachers. An Adverse Childhood Experience Self-Reporting Screener will also be given to participants to establish a baseline of exposure to childhood trauma, which is closely correlated with health outcomes. Teachers will also complete the Teachers' Sense of Self Efficacy Survey and the Professional Quality of Life Index, which are linked to teacher mental health, retention, and career satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Montana
      • Livingston, Montana, United States, 59047
        • Park High School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any teacher currently employed by the Livingston school district who wishes to participate in the intervention (up to 35 participants)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Only teachers will be considered for this study (i.e., no school staff, administrators, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group Yoga
35 rural teachers in a southwestern Montana school district participating in a trauma-informed yoga intervention
6 weeks of twice weekly trauma-informed yoga for 45 minutes per session
No Intervention: No Intervention
No participants were assigned to the No Intervention Arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Salivary Cortisol Levels
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Participants will provide a saliva sample in which cortisol levels will be analyzed through salivary assay kits (through Salimetrics.com). Samples will be collected on the first day of the intervention, halfway through the intervention, and on the last day of the intervention to determine if the intervention has improved stress levels (as indicated by a reduction in cortisol levels). A biostatistician will provide analysis and conclusion of these samples at the conclusion of the study
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
This 9 item questionnaire is designed to evaluate severity of depressive symptoms in participants. It is scored on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) on items linked to depression indicators. The minimum score is a 0 and the maximum score is a 27, and a reduction in score from pre- to post-assessment indicates an improvement in symptomology. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Anxiety Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
This 7 item questionnaire is based on a likert scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) for items related to anxiety disorders. The lowest score is a zero and the maximum score is a 21. A reduction in score from pre- to post-assessment indicates an improvement in symptomology. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Participants enrolled will have their heart rate data measured by the HeartMath Institute Inner Balance Bluetooth Sensor and accompanying software for Android or IOS smartphones (Inner Balance) or Inner Balance USB Sensor and accompanying computer software (EmWave Pro Plus (28, 29) The small plastic sensors will clip to the participant's earlobe and send photoplethysmography-derived (PPG) pulse signals via a non-invasive light source and photodetector.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
The Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) is a unidimensional self-reported scale consisting of 10-items measuring resilience. Respondents rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all the time). Each item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 4. The minimum value is a 0 and the maximum value is a 100. A higher score indicates higher resilience, which indicates a better outcome.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Professional Quality of Life Index (Pro-QOL)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
The Professional Quality of Life Index (Pro-QOL) is self-reporting scale consisting of 30 items measuring levels of compassion satisfaction, secondary trauma, and professional burnout. Respondents rate items on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (very often). The minimum score for each subscale is a 10, and the maximum score for each subscale is a 50. Higher scores on compassion satisfaction items indicate higher levels of job enjoyment, whereas higher scores on burnout and secondary trauma items indicate lower levels of job satisfaction. For each of the sub-scales scores are categorized as Low (22 or less), Moderate (between 23 and 41) or High (42 or more). A total sum of each sub-scale is not intended to be measured. Higher scores on the compassion satisfaction scale indicate a better outcome. Lower scores on burnout and secondary trauma indicate a better outcome.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (Short Form) (TSSE)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
The Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy is a self-reporting scale consisting of 12 items measuring levels of self-perceived levels of impact on student engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management. Respondents rate items on a 9 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (nothing) to 9 (a great deal). Higher scores indicate higher self-perceptions of self-efficacy. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. A minimum score isa 12, and a maximum score of 108 is possible on the scale.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scales (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale is self-reporting scale consisting of 8 items measuring perceived levels of sleep quality over the previous 7 days. Items are scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Higher scores indicate a greater severity of sleep disturbance. The scale's minimum score is an 8, and the scale's maximum score is 40; therefore, lower scores indicate better quality of sleep. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a self-reporting scale consisting of 20 items measuring traumatic stress symptoms in the previous month. Items are scored on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores indicate higher levels of traumatic stress in respondents. The scale's minimum score is a zero with a maximum score being an 80. Therefore, lower scores indicate an improvement in traumatic stress symptomology. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (Week 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alexandra Adams, MD, Ph.D, Montana State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MontanaSUYear3
  • P20GM104417 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Trauma-Informed Yoga

Subscribe