- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05114005
Tango for Neuropathy Among Breast Cancer Survivors
Novel Interventions for Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will be randomized (1:1) to one of two activity intervention arms: Argentine Tango dance or home exercise. Information about neuropathy symptoms, motion, falls incidence, and participant feedback about the interventions will be collected.
Aim1: To evaluate change in postural control over 16 sessions of Tango (exp) vs HEX (control) (n=26 per group) as primary endpoint. As secondary measures, to assess: balance function (i.e., TUG) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (i.e., symptoms, pain, fatigue, mood, quality of life) monthly including 1 month post-intervention completion; postural control and symptoms within-session; and falls incidence weekly for 6 months following intervention completion. Hypothesis: At primary endpoint, participants in the experimental group will show more improvement than participants in the control group in measures sensitive to neuropathy disease state (i.e., sway variability and area).
Aim2: To evaluate change in gait variability after 16 sessions of Tango (exp) vs HEX (control) (n=26 per group; 1:1 randomization). As secondary measures, to analyze local and orbital dynamic stability (pre, post, and 1mo post-intervention), PROs (monthly), and falls incidence (weekly) following intervention completion. Hypothesis: At primary endpoint, participants in the experimental group will show more improvement than participants in the control group in measures of gait variability (i.e., stride-to-stride variability in speed).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43212
- Stephanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Breast cancer survivor stage I-III
- Symptomatic for neuropathy
- postural control outside 70% CI for adults who are middle-aged without neurotrauma
- having completed taxane-based chemotherapy treatment at least 3 months ago;
- able to understand and comply with directions associated with testing and study treatments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing vestibular deficit;
- poorly controlled diabetes (hgA1C > 8);
- non-ambulatory or lower extremity amputation (assistive devices allowed);
- use of cytotoxic or immunotherapy during study (endocrine therapy allowed);
- participation in physical therapy during the study;
- contraindication to participate in Tango due to orthopedic issue (e.g., herniated vertebral disc);
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tango
The intervention will consist of 16 Argentine Tango (Tango) sessions, adapted for neurorehabilitation per Hackney and Earhart (2010).
Delivered over 8 weeks at a frequency of 2x per week and duration of 1 hour per session, this program teaches the basics steps of partnered Tango dance.
|
Rhythmically-entrained sensorimotor activity.
|
Active Comparator: Home Exercise (HEX)
The control group will consist of an evidence-based, structured home exercise program (HEX) based on the 8 week intervention described by Zimmer et al (2018) and recommended by physical therapists specializing in BC within our organization.
This program consists of information on neuropathy and fall prevention combined with a schedule of 1 hr training (i.e., endurance, resistance, and sensorimotor) performed 2x per week
|
This program consists of information on neuropathy and fall prevention combined with a schedule of 1 hr training (i.e., endurance, resistance, and sensorimotor) performed 2x per week
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Postural Control (variability)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
root-mean square of the center of pressure (COP)
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Postural Control (ellipse area)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
95% ellipse area of the COP
|
8 weeks
|
Postural Control (velocity)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
velocity of COP
|
8 weeks
|
Postural Control (complexity)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
sample entropy of COP
|
8 weeks
|
Postural Control (variability)
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
root-mean square of the center of pressure (COP)
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (variability)
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
root-mean square of the center of pressure (COP)
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (ellipse area)
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
95% ellipse area of the COP
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (ellipse area)
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
95% ellipse area of the COP
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (velocity)
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
velocity of COP
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (velocity)
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
velocity of COP
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (complexity)
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
sample entropy of COP
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (complexity)
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
sample entropy of COP
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Postural Control (variability)
Time Frame: 1 month follow up post-intervention
|
root-mean square of the center of pressure (COP)
|
1 month follow up post-intervention
|
Postural Control (ellipse area)
Time Frame: 1 month follow up post-intervention
|
95% ellipse area of the COP
|
1 month follow up post-intervention
|
Postural Control (velocity)
Time Frame: 1 month follow up post-intervention
|
velocity of COP
|
1 month follow up post-intervention
|
Postural Control (complexity)
Time Frame: 1 month follow up post-intervention
|
sample entropy of COP
|
1 month follow up post-intervention
|
Clinical measure of balance function
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Timed Up-and-Go test, or TUG, (<2 min to administer) is a timed test of a person's ability to stand from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, and return to sitting with shorter times indicating better functional balance.
|
8 weeks
|
Clinical measure of balance function
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
The Timed Up-and-Go test, or TUG, (<2 min to administer) is a timed test of a person's ability to stand from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, and return to sitting with shorter times indicating better functional balance.
|
1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
Neuropathy Symptoms Score
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN 20): is a validated instrument for longitudinal evaluation of neuropathy symptoms induced by chemotherapy.
This is a 20-item patient reported questionnaire that includes three subscales evaluating sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms.
It is easy to use and filled out by patients themselves.
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Neuropathy Symptoms Score
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN 20): is a validated instrument for longitudinal evaluation of neuropathy symptoms induced by chemotherapy.
This is a 20-item patient reported questionnaire that includes three subscales evaluating sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms.
It is easy to use and filled out by patients themselves.
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Neuropathy Symptoms Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN 20): is a validated instrument for longitudinal evaluation of neuropathy symptoms induced by chemotherapy.
This is a 20-item patient reported questionnaire that includes three subscales evaluating sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms.
It is easy to use and filled out by patients themselves.
|
8 weeks
|
Neuropathy Symptoms Score
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN 20): is a validated instrument for longitudinal evaluation of neuropathy symptoms induced by chemotherapy.
This is a 20-item patient reported questionnaire that includes three subscales evaluating sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms.
It is easy to use and filled out by patients themselves.
|
1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI) is a validated instrument used to evaluate pain symptoms and functional capacity "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much pain they are in "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst pain imaginable).
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI) is a validated instrument used to evaluate pain symptoms and functional capacity "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much pain they are in "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst pain imaginable).
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI) is a validated instrument used to evaluate pain symptoms and functional capacity "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much pain they are in "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst pain imaginable).
|
8 weeks
|
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI) is a validated instrument used to evaluate pain symptoms and functional capacity "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much pain they are in "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst pain imaginable).
|
1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
Cancer-Related Fatigue
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is used to rapidly assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much fatigue they feel "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst fatigue imaginable).
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Cancer-Related Fatigue
Time Frame: at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is used to rapidly assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much fatigue they feel "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst fatigue imaginable).
|
at the conclusion of each assessment or intervention session (up to 1 hr duration) for up to 20 sessions
|
Cancer-Related Fatigue
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is used to rapidly assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much fatigue they feel "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst fatigue imaginable).
|
8 weeks
|
Cancer-Related Fatigue
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is used to rapidly assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue "right now" using a single item visual analog scale (VAS) on which participants will rate how much fatigue they feel "right now" on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being high the worst fatigue imaginable).
|
1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
Falls Incidence
Time Frame: once at the point of study enrollment
|
the number of falls or near falls that the participant remembers experiencing in the month prior to enrollment in the study
|
once at the point of study enrollment
|
Falls Incidence
Time Frame: at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
the number of falls or near falls experienced by the participant since last evaluation/intervention session
|
at the beginning of each assessment or intervention session for up to 20 sessions
|
Falls Incidence
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
|
the number of falls or near falls experienced by the participant in the 6 months post-intervention
|
6 months post-intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Quantified Clinical Measure of Balance Function
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Mini Balance Evaluation System Test short version (MiniBEST): evaluates sensory organization, anticipatory and reactive postural control, and dynamic gait indices on a scale from 1 to 28 points (28 represents the highest function measurable by the test); was recently recommended for use in studies of neuropathy; and discriminated BC survivors from controls in at least 1 prior study.
Instrumentation of MiniBEST will enable the calculation of spatiotemporal, kinematic, and co-contraction measures
|
8 weeks
|
Quantified Clinical Measure of Balance Function
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
The Mini Balance Evaluation System Test short version (MiniBEST): evaluates sensory organization, anticipatory and reactive postural control, and dynamic gait indices on a scale from 1 to 28 points (28 represents the highest function measurable by the test); was recently recommended for use in studies of neuropathy; and discriminated BC survivors from controls in at least 1 prior study.
Instrumentation of MiniBEST will enable the calculation of spatiotemporal, kinematic, and co-contraction measures.
|
1 month follow-up post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lise Worthen-Chaudhari, PhD, MFA, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zimmer P, Trebing S, Timmers-Trebing U, Schenk A, Paust R, Bloch W, Rudolph R, Streckmann F, Baumann FT. Eight-week, multimodal exercise counteracts a progress of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and improves balance and strength in metastasized colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):615-624. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3875-5. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
- Hackney ME, Earhart GM. Recommendations for Implementing Tango Classes for Persons with Parkinson Disease. Am J Dance Ther. 2010 Jun;32(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s10465-010-9086-y.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015C0090
- NCI-2018-00310 (Registry Identifier: CTRP)
- R21AG068831 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- OSU-15047 (Other Identifier: OSU)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuropathy
-
Arash Asher, MDVoxxLifeRecruitingNeuropathy | Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy | Neuropathy;PeripheralUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemOctapharma USA, Inc.RecruitingSmall Fiber Neuropathy | Autoimmune Small Fiber Neuropathy | Inflammatory Polyneuropathy | Immune-Mediated NeuropathyUnited States
-
Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., LtdCompletedMultifocal Motor NeuropathyJapan
-
University of AarhusCompletedMultifocal Motor NeuropathyDenmark
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterPhoenix Neurological Associates, LTDCompletedSmall Fiber Neuropathy | Idiopathic Peripheral NeuropathyUnited States
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedDiabetic Neuropathies | Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy | Painful Diabetic Neuropathy | Autonomic Neuropathy | Diabetic Polyneuropathy | Small Fiber NeuropathyEgypt
-
Yung-Tsan WuCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRecruiting
-
Sorlandet Hospital HFOslo University Hospital; University Hospital of North Norway; University Hospital...Not yet recruitingSmall Fiber Neuropathy | Sensory Neuropathy
-
Tri-Service General HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation
-
Hospital Sociosanitari Mutuam GironaCompletedStroke | Gait, Hemiplegic | Gait Disorders, NeurologicSpain
-
Chang Gung UniversityUnknown
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsyThailand
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityRecruiting
-
Pontifical Catholic University of ArgentinaUniversity of Buenos Aires; National Council of Scientific and Technical Research... and other collaboratorsWithdrawn
-
IRCCS Eugenio MedeaEnrolling by invitationLanguage Development Disorders | Infant Development | Language Development | InterventionItaly
-
The Cleveland ClinicThe Kelvin and Eleanor Smith FoundationCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Ambulation DifficultyUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicNational Institutes of Health (NIH)WithdrawnGait Disturbance in Multiple Sclerosis PatientsUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicConsortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers; MedRhythms, Inc.CompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Gait Disorders, NeurologicUnited States