REMASTer: REcurrent Brain Metastases After SRS Trial

April 11, 2024 updated by: Monteris Medical
Randomized, post-market multi-center study investigating the efficacy of two sets of treatment algorithms in brain metastases (BM) patients at the time of first intervention for radiographic progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with or without surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

261

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Recruiting
        • Duke University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter Fecci, MD
        • Contact:
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Recruiting
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adrian Laxton, MD
    • Ohio
      • Kettering, Ohio, United States, 45429

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Patients with radiographically proven (by gadolinium-enhanced [Gd-] MRI) parenchymal brain metastases from histologically confirmed non-central nervous system (CNS) cancer.
  2. Patients with a "targetable", bidimensionally-measurable, intracranial lesion that is radiographically recurrent after previous treatment with SRS +/- surgery (craniotomy or LITT). To classify a lesion as radiographically progressive, the lesion must demonstrate a ≥ 25% increase in size following treatment based on the Neuro-Oncology Criteria of Tumor Response for CNS Tumors. To be "targetable" for this study, the lesion should be coverable through a planned single LITT trajectory and thus have a maximum perpendicular diameter (perpendicular to the laser trajectory) of 3 cm. An intra-operative decision to utilize two trajectories is acceptable and patient may remain on study.
  3. Patient must be at least 3 months post initial SRS treatment of the target lesion
  4. Target lesion must be amenable to undergo surgical biopsy and LITT treatment as determined by the treating neurosurgeon.
  5. Frozen pathology diagnosis must be attainable.
  6. Patient must be symptomatically stable for a minimum of 3 days prior to the procedure date on a on a max total daily steroid dose equivalent to 4mg of Dexamethasone.
  7. ≥18 years of age
  8. KPS ≥70
  9. Patient is able and willing to complete study requirements
  10. Patients with adequate hematologic parameters (all tests to be performed within <4 weeks of biopsy):

    1. ANC ≥ 1.5 X 109/L
    2. Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
  11. Blood chemistry laboratory value for serum creatinine < 1.5 x ULN (test to be performed within <4 weeks of biopsy)
  12. Female patients must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. (Not applicable to patients with bilateral oophorectomy and/or hysterectomy or to those patients who are postmenopausal)
  13. All patients of reproductive potential must agree to use an effective method of contraception during the study
  14. Patients must be accessible for follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Patients with greater than 3 progressing lesions at time of enrollment. To classify as a radiographically progressive, lesion must demonstrate a ≥ 25% increase in size following treatment based on the RANO criteria. Of note, there is no exclusion for total number of metastases. However, only one lesion can be selected to be the targeted lesion and this lesion alone may be ablated during the study procedure.
  2. Patients with concomitant newly diagnosed intracranial metastases (concurrent with the targetable radiographically progressive lesion), as these will require prioritized and different treatment approaches.
  3. Prior bevacizumab use within 4 weeks of study initiation
  4. Patients with additional concurrent malignancies requiring active treatment, except non-melanoma skin cancer, or in-situ cancer of the cervix
  5. Patients with a serious active infection or other serious underlying medical conditions that would impair the ability of the patient to complete the protocol related QOL questionnaires and cognition assessments
  6. Inability to tolerate or contraindication to steroid therapy (i.e., dexamethasone)
  7. Deemed ineligible or unable to tolerate SRS therapy by treating neurosurgeon and/or radiation oncologist
  8. Patients with any condition that would prohibit them from undergoing a surgical procedure, at the discretion of the treating physician team
  9. Patients unwilling or unable to give consent for participation
  10. Patients unable to comply with study requirements
  11. Patients with diffuse leptomeningeal disease
  12. Patients with rapidly progressing extracranial disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Recurrent Tumor
Receives Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) followed by surveillance or Receives Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) followed by hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT).
Post-op hypofractionated therapy or no radiation therapy
Minimally invasive technique to necrotize intracranial lesions using the NeuroBlate® System (NBS)
Other: Radiation Necrosis
Receives Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) and best medical management with steroids or Receives best medical management with steroids.
Minimally invasive technique to necrotize intracranial lesions using the NeuroBlate® System (NBS)
Best medical management with steroid therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progressive Disease Cohort
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months
Determine the effectiveness of LITT using the NeuroBlate® System with or without repeat SRS on recurrent brain metastases, as measured by freedom from local progression.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months
Radiation Necrosis Cohort
Time Frame: Assessed for a three month period from time of randomization to steroid freedom without escalation of care.
Determine the effectiveness of LITT using the NeuroBlate System versus standard medical management as measured by time to steroid independence without escalation of care, measured in days from LITT procedure, defined as freedom from steroids for a period of four weeks without escalation of care.
Assessed for a three month period from time of randomization to steroid freedom without escalation of care.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progressive Disease Cohort: Overall Survival
Time Frame: Compare treatment approaches with respect to overall survival, defined as time from study biopsy to death or study exit, up to 24 months.
Compare treatment approaches with respect to overall survival.
Compare treatment approaches with respect to overall survival, defined as time from study biopsy to death or study exit, up to 24 months.
Radiation Necrosis Cohort: Freedom from Local Progression (FFLP) or Neurological Death
Time Frame: Compare treatment approaches with respect to overall survival, defined as time from study biopsy to death or study exit, up to 24 months
Compare treatment approaches with respect to FFLP or neurologic death
Compare treatment approaches with respect to overall survival, defined as time from study biopsy to death or study exit, up to 24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Explore the relationship between radiographic features and biopsy results
Time Frame: From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Explore radiographic features, measured as change in enhancing lesion volume and T2 FLAIR volume, at each follow up imaging timepoint (post-op and months 1,3,6,9,12,18,24) or until study exit.
From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Treatment failure in all cohorts/arms.
Time Frame: From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measured in time to salvage therapy
From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Survival time from randomization
From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Freedom from Local Progression (FFLP)
Time Frame: From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measure time from procedure to disease progression
From randomization through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Quality of Life- KPS
Time Frame: From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measure change in scoring from baseline over time
From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Quality of Life- NCCN Distress
Time Frame: From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measure change in scoring from baseline over time
From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Quality of Life- FACT-BR
Time Frame: From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measure change in scoring from baseline over time
From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Cognitive Measure- Trail Making Test
Time Frame: From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measure change in scoring from baseline over time
From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Cognitive Measure- HVLT
Time Frame: From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Measure change in scoring from baseline over time
From baseline through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first)
Describe Quality of Life (QoL) and cognition over time
Time Frame: From enrollment through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first). Measurements occur at baseline, post-op visit, 1 month visit, and each subsequent follow up visit until study exit or at 24 months, whichever comes first.
Change from baseline at each follow-up assessment for each cognitive and QoL subscale
From enrollment through 24 months or study exit (whichever comes first). Measurements occur at baseline, post-op visit, 1 month visit, and each subsequent follow up visit until study exit or at 24 months, whichever comes first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Metastases

Clinical Trials on Radiation Therapy

3
Subscribe