Evidence-Based Robot-Assistant in Neurorehabilitation (E-BRAiN)

December 7, 2023 updated by: University Medicine Greifswald

E-BRAiN - Evidence-Based Robot-Assistant in Neurorehabilitation

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of the therapeutic system E-BRAiN for the treatment of stroke-related impairments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial, RCT with cross-over design sequentially allocates participants with stroke-related impairment to both a two week course of conventional rehabilitation therapy and a two week course of therapy using the therapy system E-BRAiN (purpose-built therapy system using a socially interactive humanoid robot); participants are randomly allocated to the sequences "conventional => robot" or "robot => conventional". Stroke survivors with one of the target syndromes, i.e. mild arm paresis, or moderate to severe arm paresis, or visuospatial neglect are invited to participate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Greifswald, Germany, 17475
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ann Loiuse Pedersen, M.D.
      • Greifswald, Germany, 17491
        • Recruiting
        • BDH-Klinik Greifswald
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ann Louise Pedersen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age at study entry ≥ 18 years
  • Stroke (ischemic stroke, non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoidal haemorrhage)
  • Incomplete arm paresis (Motricity Index, arm score >1 [Min] and < 100 [Max]) or
  • Visuospatial neglect (clinical signs and NET subtest "star cancellation" score < 50)
  • Candidate able to consent and provides informed consent or
  • legal representative provides informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Obliged to live in an institution by law or public authority
  • With case presentation arm paresis: another condition that causes arm paresis is present
  • With case presentation visuospatial neglect: another condition that causes a relevant visual-perceptual deficit that cannot be compensated is present; exception: homonymous visual field deficits are not an exclusion criterion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy
Length of period: 2 weeks
Conventional therapy specifies the neurorehabilitation therapy as applied as regular treatment.
Experimental: Therapy assisted by a humanoid robot (E-BRAiN)
Length of period: 2 weeks Fixed dose: 10 therapy sessions with E-BRAiN
The therapy system E-BRAiN is a purpose-built therapy system using a socially interactive humanoid robot and provides individualised therapy for arm rehabilitation based on the evidence-based therapies arm basis training, arm ability training, or mirror therapy for arm rehabilitation (paresis) or neurovisual training (neglect).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change scores over two weeks for the standardised primary outcome measure
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Change scores are difference scores for assessments taken two weeks apart. Changes scores are based on standardised outcome measures. Assessment scores for each measure (see below) are standardised using the known variance in stroke survivor populations for the respective measure.

The following assessments will be used for standardised outcome measures:

Nine-Hole-Peg-Test, NHPT (finger dexterity) and Box-and-Block Test, BBT (gross manual dexterity) (for participants with mild arm paresis); Fugl Meyer, Arm motor score, FM Arm (selective arm and hand movement capacity) (participants with moderate to severe arm paresis); Neglect-Test, NET (spatial visual attention) (participants with visual neglect).

2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drop-out rate
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Drop-outs
2 weeks
Goal attainment
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Goal attainment Scale (GAS)
2 weeks
Change scores over two weeks for "Motivation for therapy"
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Change scores are difference scores for assessments taken two weeks apart with Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for motivational factors (Min 0, Max 100)
2 weeks
Change scores over two weeks for "Emotional distress"
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Change scores are difference scores for assessments taken two weeks apart with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
2 weeks
Work alliance
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of the perceived work alliance for the period of two weeks prior using the Work Alliance Inventory (WAI)
2 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Adverse events documentation for the period of two weeks
2 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Type and frequency of neurorehabilitation therapy received
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Therapy documentation for the period of two weeks
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Platz, Prof.Dr.med., Head, Neurorehabilitation Research Group

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202101E-BRAiN
  • CIV-21-01-035629 (Registry Identifier: EUDAMED)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Conventional therapy

3
Subscribe