The CIA Score: a Learner's Tool

March 14, 2022 updated by: Chi-Ho Ban Tsui, Stanford University

Critical, Intervention, Assess: Using the CIA System as a Learning Tool to Assess Bleeding Risk in Regional Anesthesia.

The goal of this project is to use a previously described scoring system - the CIA system - as a teaching tool to help learners assess the bleeding risk of peripheral nerve blocks. We will teach the CIA system to residents, then they will complete a survey in which they apply the system to various peripheral nerve blocks. We hypothesize that the CIA system will allow learners to reach the same consensus about bleeding risk as expert opinions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Prior survey of Stanford and Palo Alto VA regional anesthesiologists showed diverging assessments of whether various blocks are considered superficial or deep. Investigators hope to have a simple systematic approach to "scoring" regional anesthesia procedures which can be used as a basis for discussion and comparison of regional expert's opinions.

A scoring system using three categories of consideration to classify any regional procedure is proposed. The following three categories, Critical, Intervention, and Assess (CIA) can be used to analyze any procedure to determine bleeding risk. A score of 0 or 1, was given to each parameter depending on whether it was absent or present. A total score can be range from 0 to 3. From this, the risk can be categorized based on the total score as low-risk (0), intermediate-risk (1) or high-risk (2 or 3).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Stanford Regional Anesthesia attending physicians and residents

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Regional Anesthesiologist and interested staff from Stanford

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-regional anesthesiologists and non-interested staff at Stanford

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Residents
We plan to distribute a survey to the Stanford anesthesiology residents to determine their assessment of the bleeding risk of nerve blocks. The survey will list the most common nerve blocks and ask the resident anesthesiologists at Stanford whether the block is low/intermediate/high risk based on a scoring system of location relative to critical structures, compressibility, and whether bleeding or hematoma would be readily apparent.
There will be no interventions for study participants. Participants will be asked to complete a survey.
Attending physicians
We plan to distribute a survey to the Stanford anesthesiology attending physicians to determine their assessment of the bleeding risk of several different nerve blocks. The survey will list the most common nerve blocks and ask Stanford anesthesiologists whether the block is low/intermediate/high risk based on their experience with nerve blocks.
There will be no interventions for study participants. Participants will be asked to complete a survey.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CIA score by trainees
Time Frame: 2 months
The bleeding risk of each peripheral nerve block as assessed by trainees, using the CIA scoring system.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 23, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 48095

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trials on Survey

Subscribe