Effects of Cervical Lateral Glide Along With Thoracic Mobilizations in Patients With Neurogenic Cervicobrachial Pain.

February 1, 2022 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Cervical Lateral Glide Mobilizations Along With Thoracic Mobilizations in Patients With Neurogenic Cervicobrachial Pain.

In the scientific literature, cervicobrachial pain is the presence of pain in the neck that radiates or refers to the arm. It is considered as common spine disorder with upper quadrant pain due to muscles, joints or intervertebral discs. This study aims to compare the effects of direct neural tissue technique that is cervical lateral glide mobilization along with indirect neural tissue mobilization technique that is thoracic mobilization on pain, range of motion, endurance of neck flexors and functional ability in patients with cervicobrachial pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The exact incidence of cervicobrachial pain syndrome is not known due to the paucity of population-based studies, patients suffering the symptoms of this condition frequently attend for physiotherapy.

In the scientific literature, cervicobrachial pain is the presence of pain in the neck that radiates or refers to the arm. It is considered as common spine disorder with upper quadrant pain due to muscles, joints or intervertebral discs. Upper quadrant discomfort involves neck, shoulder, arm, upper back but neural tissue sensitivity to mechanical stimuli portrays to be the essential element of cervicobrachial pain. It generally refers to neck pain that along with paresthesia is radiating to one upper extremity and leading to muscle imbalances. Elvey planned some clinical tests to recognize the problems of neurogenic disorders that are responsive to non-intrusive physical therapy treatment. The acceptability of these tests from effective treatments has not been adequately proven yet.

According to the literature cervical lateral glide is considered as first line treatment in reducing pain and improving upper limb function and is specifically very effective in patients of cervicobrachial pain syndrome. Cervical lateral glide has hypoalgesic effect on neck and arm pain. It is thought that this technique stimulates cervical afferents which can affect pain processes at spinal cord and cortical levels. A study was conducted in which passive techniques for mobilizing neural tissue and cervical spine were given as direct manual therapy treatment. Thoracic mobilization corresponds to indirect neural mobilization that is effective in reducing pain and functional limitations when incorporated with cervical spine mobilization that is referred as direct neural mobilization in patients of cervicobrachial pain. Evidence suggests that improvement in cervical stability and thoracic mobility achieved through manual therapy is significant in reducing neck pain and improving functional motion This study would help to investigate the delineation between specific and non-specific components of manual therapy. This study aims to compare the effects of direct neural tissue technique that is cervical lateral glide mobilization along with indirect neural tissue mobilization technique that is thoracic mobilization on pain, range of motion, endurance of neck flexors and functional ability in patients with cervicobrachial pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 43600
        • Benazir Bhutto Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain in upper quadrant associated with cervical spine eliciting unilateral neck pain.
  • Paresthesia and numbness in the neck and arm for at least three continuous months
  • Active movements of cervical spine (extension, lateral flexion to either side or ipsilateral rotations) and arm movements reproducing pain.
  • Symptom reproduction on passive movements in the same pattern as with active movements.
  • Elicitation of adverse response (in terms of range of movement and reproduction of symptoms) to neural tissue provocation testing of median, ulnar and radial nerves and subsequent symptom alteration with neural tissue differentiating maneuvers.
  • Tenderness at transverse processes of cervical spine (nerve roots), nerve trunks of median, ulnar and radial nerves at different anatomical locations in the course of respective neural tissue.
  • Hyperalgesic related cutaneous tissues on palpation (tender points).
  • Evidence of a related pathology (example: radiological evidence of cervical disc pathology in the vicinity of involved nerve roots or evidence of stenosis at cervical neural foramen as diagnosed by a qualified musculoskeletal Radiologist)
  • provoked or spontaneous paresthesia and pain with radicular distribution
  • Positive results in the following tests: Spurling, Distraction, and Upper Limb tension test.
  • Diagnosis will be based upon subjective presentation of patient's pain pattern which includes somatic referred pain and neurogenic radiating symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral symptoms (due to unilateral nature of lateral glide mobilization technique).
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Systemic diseases besides neck pain.
  • Vertebral infections.
  • Presented red flags.
  • Used analgesics within 48 hours before initial assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: cervical lateral glide
A cervical segmental contralateral lateral glide treatment technique is performed at 1 or more motion segments of the cervical spine (C5-T1), including the level(s) of the segmental motion restriction. With the patient in a supine position, the therapist cradled the head and neck above, and including, the level to be treated and performed a lateral translatory movement away from the involved side while minimizing gross cervical side flexion or rotation.
A cervical segmental contralateral lateral glide treatment technique is performed at 1 or more motion segments of the cervical spine (C5-T1), including the level(s) of the segmental motion restriction. With the patient in a supine position, the therapist cradled the head and neck above, and including, the level to be treated and performed a lateral translatory movement away from the involved side while minimizing gross cervical side flexion or rotation.
Participants in group B will be given cervical lateral glide along with thoracic mobilization technique in prone position.
Experimental: thoracic mobilization
A posteroanterior unilateral pressure will be applied over the transverse processes at T2-T5 on the ipsilateral side of pain in prone position.
A cervical segmental contralateral lateral glide treatment technique is performed at 1 or more motion segments of the cervical spine (C5-T1), including the level(s) of the segmental motion restriction. With the patient in a supine position, the therapist cradled the head and neck above, and including, the level to be treated and performed a lateral translatory movement away from the involved side while minimizing gross cervical side flexion or rotation.
Participants in group B will be given cervical lateral glide along with thoracic mobilization technique in prone position.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric pain rating scale for pain
Time Frame: at base line
Numeric pain rating scale is used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This scale exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability and show adequate responsiveness in patients with neck pain. Assessment to be done at base line
at base line
Numeric pain rating scale for pain
Time Frame: at 2nd week
Numeric pain rating scale is used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This scale exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability and show adequate responsiveness in patients with neck pain. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.
at 2nd week
Numeric pain rating scale for pain
Time Frame: at 4th week
Numeric pain rating scale is used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This scale exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability and show adequate responsiveness in patients with neck pain. Assessment to be done at 4th week.
at 4th week
Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (for physical function)
Time Frame: at baseline
Function will be measured by the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire that is divided into nine-five parts sections. The questionnaire is easy for patients to complete, simple to score and provides an objective measure to evaluate outcome in patients with acute or chronic neck pain. This questionnaire has been demonstrated to have short-term repeatability and long-term sensitivity to change. Assessment to be done at baseline.
at baseline
Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (for physical function)
Time Frame: at 2nd week
Function will be measured by the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire that is divided into nine-five parts sections. The questionnaire is easy for patients to complete, simple to score and provides an objective measure to evaluate outcome in patients with acute or chronic neck pain. This questionnaire has been demonstrated to have short-term repeatability and long-term sensitivity to change. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.
at 2nd week
Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (for physical function)
Time Frame: at 4th week
Function will be measured by the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire that is divided into nine-five parts sections. The questionnaire is easy for patients to complete, simple to score and provides an objective measure to evaluate outcome in patients with acute or chronic neck pain. This questionnaire has been demonstrated to have short-term repeatability and long-term sensitivity to change. Assessment to be done at 4th week
at 4th week
Cervical range of motion by Goniometer
Time Frame: at baseline
cervical range of motion will be measured by using universal goniometer. It is a reliable tool for assessing cervical range of motion in a clinical setting and is cheap. Assessment to be done at baseline.
at baseline
Cervical range of motion by Goniometer
Time Frame: at 2nd week
cervical range of motion will be measured by using universal goniometer. It is a reliable tool for assessing cervical range of motion in a clinical setting and is cheap. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.
at 2nd week
Cervical range of motion by Goniometer
Time Frame: at 4th week
cervical range of motion will be measured by using universal goniometer. It is a reliable tool for assessing cervical range of motion in a clinical setting and is cheap. Assessment to be done at 4th week.
at 4th week
Deep neck flexor endurance test
Time Frame: at baseline
Neck flexor endurance will be measured with deep neck flexor endurance test(Rectus Capitus Anterior, Rectus Capitus Lateralis, Longus Capitus, Longus Colli). It will be performed in a supine lying position by tucking patients chin in and lifting off table 1 inch. The examiner will look for substitution of the platysma or sterno-cleido mastoid muscle. The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain. Assessment to be done at baseline.
at baseline
Deep neck flexor endurance test
Time Frame: at 2nd week
Neck flexor endurance will be measured with deep neck flexor endurance test(Rectus Capitus Anterior, Rectus Capitus Lateralis, Longus Capitus, Longus Colli). It will be performed in a supine lying position by tucking patients chin in and lifting off table 1 inch. The examiner will look for substitution of the platysma or sterno-cleido mastoid muscle. The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.
at 2nd week
Deep neck flexor endurance test
Time Frame: at 4th week
Neck flexor endurance will be measured with deep neck flexor endurance test(Rectus Capitus Anterior, Rectus Capitus Lateralis, Longus Capitus, Longus Colli). It will be performed in a supine lying position by tucking patients chin in and lifting off table 1 inch. The examiner will look for substitution of the platysma or sterno-cleido mastoid muscle. The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain. Assessment to be done at 4th week.
at 4th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: maria khalid, MS OMPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC-01051 Alisha Khan

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervicobrachial Syndrome

Clinical Trials on cervical lateral glide

3
Subscribe