- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05209737
Trendelenburg as a First-line Intervention in Critically Ill, Sedated, Invasively Mechanically Ventilated, Hypotensive Patients (Trend)
Trendelenburg as a First-line Intervention in Critically Ill, Sedated, Invasively Mechanically Ventilated, Hypotensive Patients: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Trendelenburg position in critically ill patients with hypotension, mainly patients with septic shock and post operative vasoplegia. The main aim is to assess whether Trendelenburg position can improve organ function through a reduction in the need of fluid infusion and dose of vasopressors.
Patients will be screened for participation in the study and eventually randomized based on a balanced randomization scheme (1:1) to Trendelenburg position up to 72 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission or Semirecumbent position (standard of care).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Current consensus on circulatory shock management defines shock as a life-threatening, generalized form of acute circulatory failure associated with inadequate tissue perfusion. Recommended interventions to improve perfusion include early hemodynamic stabilization through fluid resuscitation, along with treatment of the cause of shock. If impaired cardiac function results in inadequate cardiac output and tissue hypoperfusion despite fluid therapy, vasopressor agents should be administered.
Nevertheless, fluid overload causes multi-organ edema, such as pulmonary edema or hepatic congestion. Moreover, the negative effects of fluid intravenous administrations were also studied on healthy volunteers during the years. Most of them showed the development of lung injury due to fluid administration.
In addition, vasopressors are also associated with poor outcomes. Described serious adverse effects include organ ischemia, tachyarrhythmias, and atrial fibrillation, leading to organ dysfunction and mortality.
The head-down position, also known as the Trendelenburg position, was originally used by the surgeon Friederich Trendelenburg to improve surgical exposure of pelvic organs. The Trendelenburg position became then a widely popular procedure in managing patients with hypotension and shock. The primary effect of the Trendelenburg position is an increase in cardiac output. Although the short term effect on blood pressure and CO is certain, there is no agreement on its benefit in terms of tissue perfusion and clinical outcome in critically ill hypotensive patients, as nobody has attempted the Trendelenburg position as first line management.
To date, the gold standard position for patients in ICU according to the latest ESICM guidelines to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia is the semirecumbent position. Experts recommend elevating the head of the patient on the bed to a 20-45 degrees position, preferably >30 degrees position.
Critically ill patients with hypotension, mainly patients with septic shock and those with post-operative vasoplegia, may be a subgroup of patients, who would benefit from a head-down position if the risks of aspiration pneumonia are minimized. The Trendelenburg position might permit to avoid the deleterious side effects of fluids and vasoconstrictor administration.
The idea is that Trendelenburg position can improve organ function through a reduction in the need of fluid infusion and doses of vasopressors in hypovolemic, hypotensive ICU patients and therefore increase ventilator free days.
The main aim of this trial is to assess if Trendelenburg position can reduce time to severe hypotension resolution.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Moscow, Russia
- Demikhov Municipal Clinical Hospital 68
-
Moscow, Russia, 117997
- Vishnevsky Center of Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >18 years
- Admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU);
- Invasive mechanical ventilation;
- Pharmacological sedation;
- Mean arterial pressure (MAP)<65 mmHg or need of fluids infusion or any vasopressor in order to keep MAP > 65 mmHg
- Ongoing invasive and/or non-invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring
- Central venous line with central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring
- Naso-gastric tube in situ
- Indwelling bladder catheter
- Consent according to local ethical committee rules
Exclusion Criteria:
- Body mass index > 45
- Documented or suspected increased intracranial pressure, based on medical history or actual clinical condition (es. intracranial tumor, cerebral hemorrhage, encephalitis,...);
- Intra-abdominal hypertension >25 mmHg
- Documented or suspected increased intraocular pressure (any degree of glaucoma)
- Full stomach pyloric incontinence;
- Gastric stasis, defined as aspiration from the NG (nasogastric) tube of fecal, bloody, or green fluid greater than 100 mL upon insertion of the tube or within the preceding hour;
- Ongoing enteral nutrition
- No central line inserted or femoral central line only
- Not sutured known diaphragm lesions
- Known hiatus hernia
- Aortic bifurcation and/or lower extremity arterial stenosis ≥70% combined with stage 3 intermittent claudication (pain at rest)
- Patients who are not able to be investigated with a leg raising test (eg lower extremities fractures, backbone fractures or backbone pain or deformity, and those patients with large cannulas in the femoral vessels)
- Demand of specific postures (eg Trauma, fractures, backbone pain or deformity, patients with large cannulas in the femoral vessels, pronation including first pronation planned within 6 h…)
- Any device which, according to the clinician, makes it unfeasible or unsafe to put patients in the Trendelenburg position (eg Drainage in thoracic cavity)
- Mechanical Circulatory Support;
- (CHD) (Gleen, Fontaine);
- Advanced right ventricular dysfunction or advanced cardiac failure, in which volume overload worsens cardiac function (plateau stage in the Frank-Starling curve);
- Actual upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Passive leg raising test non-responder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Trendelenburg position
Position: 10-degree Head-down position
|
A 10-degree head-down position will be used in this group
|
|
Active Comparator: Semirecumbent position
Position: 30-degree Head-up position
|
A 30-degree head-up position will be used in this group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to severe hypotension resolution
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Time from randomization to timepoint in which MAP > 65 mmHg not requiring fluids or vasoactive drugs (VIS < 5), lasting > 1 hour, in the semirecumbent position
|
72 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ventilator-free days at 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
|
28 days - number of days in which the mechanical lung ventilation was not used
|
28 days
|
|
ICU-free days at 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
|
28 days - number of days in which the patient was not in an intensive care unit
|
28 days
|
|
Restarting vasopressor/inotrope therapy
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Using vasopressors and/or inotropes to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mm Hg after premature study termination (Vasoactive inotrope score > 5)
|
28 days
|
|
28-days mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
|
all cause mortality
|
28 days
|
|
90-days mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
|
all cause mortality
|
90 days
|
|
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 28 days
|
number of patients who have acute kidney injury according to KDIGO classification
|
28 days
|
|
Acute liver failure
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Rapid hepatic injury with coagulation derangements and hepatic encephalopathy and multi-organ failure in a patient with no history of liver disease
|
28 days
|
|
Ventilation-associated pneumonia
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Pneumonia due to mechanical lung ventilation
|
28 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Trend
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shock
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTraumabase Group; Capgemini Invent; Ecole polytechnique; EHESS (Ecole des hautes... and other collaboratorsCompletedWounds and Injuries | Hemorrhagic Shock | Traumatic ShockFrance
-
Biomedizinische Forschungs gmbHMedical University of ViennaCompletedSepsis | Toxic-Shock Syndrome
-
Haukeland University HospitalMinistry of Defence, NorwayCompletedHemorrhagic Shock | Hypovolemic ShockNorway
-
King's College Hospital NHS TrustUniversity Hospital BirminghamCompletedTraumatic Haemorrhagic ShockUnited Kingdom
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
Massachusetts General HospitalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston Medical Center; Tufts Medical Center and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Jason SperryNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of Washington; Resuscitation Outcomes ConsortiumCompletedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
Ramathibodi HospitalUnknownSeptic Shock | Refractory ShockThailand
-
Arsenal Medical, Inc.RecruitingTrauma | Hemorrhagic Shock | Exsanguinating Hemorrhage | Shock; TraumaticUnited States
Clinical Trials on Trendelenburg position
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalCompletedLaparoscopic Gynecological SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Medical University of GdanskRecruitingShock | Hypovolemia | Hemodynamic InstabilityPoland
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedIntubation;DifficultKorea, Republic of
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedInfants or Children Undergoing Open Heart SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Universidad de AntioquiaRecruitingRecurrence | Mortality | Prognosis | Chronic Subdural Hematoma | Trendelenburg | Clinical TrialsColombia
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedBladder Function | Bladder Integrity | Ureteral Integrity | Ureteral FunctionUnited States
-
Policlinico HospitalMassachusetts General Hospital; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino... and other collaboratorsTerminatedVentilator Associated PneumoniaSpain, Italy
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruiting
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedCritically Ill | Ventilation and Oxygenation | Obese; PositioningEgypt
-
Xiaguang DuanCompleted