- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05240534
ElderTree Via a Voice Activated Device for Managing Chronic Health Conditions (NHLBI)
Using Smart Displays to Implement Evidence-Based eHealth System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions (NHLBI)
Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are costly and pervasive among older adults. MCCs account for 90% of Medicare spending, and 65% of Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic conditions; 23% have 5 or more. MCCs are often addressed in primary care, where time pressures force a focus on medication and lab results rather than self-management skills. Patients often struggle with treatment adherence and the emotional and physical burdens of self-management and health tracking. Chronic conditions reduce quality of life (QOL) and increase loneliness, which exacerbate those conditions.
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether a voice-based platform is better for delivering an electronic health intervention to older adults than a text/typing-based platform. We have an evidence-based electronic health intervention (Elder Tree, ET) that has been shown to improve quality of life, physical and socio-emotional health outcomes for older adults with multiple chronic conditions when delivered via a text/typing-based system. The current project would test whether such patients would benefit even more if ET were delivered via a voice-based system (vs. the text-based system) because they would use it more consistently. ET is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
- University of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be ≥60 years old;
- Have medical record diagnoses of at least 5 chronic conditions of which at least 3 must come from the following: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, prediabetes or diabetes, or depression;
- Be willing to share medical record data about healthcare use (30-day hospital readmissions and ER, urgent care, primary care, and specialty care visits);
- Allow researchers to share information with the patient's primary care provider
Exclusion Criteria:
- Require an interpreter
- Report no current psychotic disorder that would prevent participation
- Have no acute medical problem requiring immediate hospitalization
- Not report impairments preventing use of a computer or tablet (e.g. blind, deaf)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control group (ET-Text)
Participants will receive ElderTree on a laptop.
|
ElderTree (ET) is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS).
ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type.
Like all CHESS systems, ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support.
ET-Text arm will access ET on Laptop.
|
|
Experimental: Experimental group (ET-Voice)
Participants will receive ElderTree on a smart system.
|
ElderTree (ET) is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS).
ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type.
Like all CHESS systems, ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support.
ET-Voice arm will access ET on a smart speaker.
Voice-activated devices can potentially be easy to use, even by those with limited dexterity or computer experience.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in functional health as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of overall health and level of physical disability.
There are 4 questions with a possible score of 4-16.
Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in pain interference as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of pain interference, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in pain intensity as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of pain intensity, this is a single question, with a possible score of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in fatigue as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of fatigue, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in sleep as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of sleep disturbance, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in anxiety as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of anxiety, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in depression as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Participant reported measure of depression, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in overall ElderTree use across the 12-month intervention
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
Amount of ElderTree use will be calculated by number of logons in the ET portal.
|
up to 12 months
|
|
Change in healthcare use (primary care, specialist, urgent care, emergency room visits, and 30-day readmissions
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Data will be collected from electronic health record.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in health distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Lorig Health Distress Scale is a self-reported measure.
It has questions about how participant feel and how things have been during the past month.
It is a 4 item scale.
Each item can be score from 0-none of the time to 5- all the time.
Higher scores corresponds to more amount of time the participant has been distressed about health (e.g.,discouraged, worried, fearful, frustrated by health problems).
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in function and disability
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (FDI) evaluates self-reported difficulty a person has in performing activities of daily living tasks.
There are 41 items with response options of "none," "a little," "some," "quite a lot," and "cannot do."
An additional eight items for participants who use a walking device.
Scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of functioning.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in well-being
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
The World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a short self-reported measure of current mental well being.
The WHO-5 consists of five statements, which respondents rate from 'All of the time = 5' to 'At no time = 0'.
The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in symptom distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
General Symptom Distress Scale & Bayliss Disease Burden Scale is a 16-item which assesses the extent of distress caused by physical symptoms.
The higher scores indicating more symptom distress or burden.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
Change in falls
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
The number of falls in the last 6 months
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
ElderTree ease of use
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18 months
|
This is a 9 item scale created for the study to assess the ease of use of ElderTree.
Participants rate items on a 4-point scale, with options ranging from not at all (1) to very much so (4), with higher scores indicating finding ElderTree useful.
|
6, 12, 18 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Survey scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
NIH Toolbox Loneliness Survey is a self-report measure that assesses perceptions of loneliness.
Participants rate items on a 5-point scale, with options ranging from never (1) to always (5).
This creates a raw score, which is then converted to a t-score, with higher scores indicating greater levels of loneliness.
|
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
ElderTree usefulness
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18 months
|
This is a 9 item scale created for the study to assess the usefulness of ElderTree.
Participants rate items on a 4-point scale, with options ranging from not at all (1) to very much so (4), with higher scores indicating finding ElderTree useful.
|
6, 12, 18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David H Gustafson, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-0984
- A195000 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- 1R61HL151870-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- Protocol Version 3/2/2023 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- 5R33HL151870 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Conditions, Multiple
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesOrganonCompletedChronic Conditions, MultipleUnited States
-
Radboud University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Radboud University Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic ConditionNetherlands
-
University of LimerickCompletedChronic Conditions, MultipleIreland
-
Parker Research InstituteOak Foundation; Rehabilitation Center Rødovre Municipality (Genoptræning Rødovre... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChronic Disease | Chronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic ConditionDenmark
-
Parker Research InstituteOak Foundation; Rehabilitation Center Rødovre Municipality (Genoptræning Rødovre... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic ConditionDenmark
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedChronic Conditions, MultipleUnited States
-
Innovation Research & TrainingCompletedHealthy | Chronic Illnesses, MultipleUnited States
-
Universidad de AlmeriaTorrecárdenas Hospital; Almería Health DistrictCompleted
-
Fundacion Universitaria Maria CanoUniversidad Iberoamericana A.C., MexicoCompletedMultiple ComorbidityColombia
Clinical Trials on ET-Text (Laptop)
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Completed
-
Menoufia UniversityAlexandria UniversityCompleted
-
Universidad de ZaragozaUniversity of ValladolidCompleted
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheNot yet recruitingSupraspinatus TendinopathySpain
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustNorthern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust; National Institute for Health... and other collaboratorsCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Impingement SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensRecruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | ASD | Social Cognition | Eye Tracking | Joint AttentionFrance
-
Vyaire MedicalM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital...EdiGene Inc.; The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical University; Zunyi Medical...CompletedTransfusion Dependent Beta-ThalassaemiaChina
-
xuliangNot yet recruiting