ElderTree Smart System for Older Adults

October 3, 2023 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Using Smart Devices to Implement an Evidence-based eHealth System for Older Adults

Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are costly and pervasive among older adults. MCCs account for 90% of Medicare spending, and 65% of Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic conditions; 23% have 5 or more. MCCs are often addressed in primary care, where time pressures force a focus on medication and lab results rather than self-management skills.

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether voice-activated "smart" technology increases adoption and sustains use of an evidence-based electronic health intervention (Elder Tree, or ET) for older adults with multiple chronic conditions, and thereby improves its potential to widely enhance quality of life and health outcomes. ET is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.

An Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that ET improved quality of life and other factors among high users of primary care with multiple chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. However, many people did not use it extensively, which is a common problem with all web apps.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

269

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53704
        • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be ≥60 years old;
  • Have been treated in University of Wisconsin (UW) Health clinics, with no plans to leave during the study period (only relevant for UW Health patients, not patients recruited from the community);
  • Have a chronic pain diagnosis AND a medical diagnoses of three or more of the following common chronic conditions: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, BMI 30+, cancer, chronic kidney disease, depression, osteoporosis, arthritis, or dizziness/falls/loss of vestibular function;
  • Be willing to share healthcare use (e.g. 30-day readmissions) in EHRs (only relevant for UW Health patients, not patients recruited from the community); and
  • Allow researchers to share information about a patient's health status with their primary care physician (PCP).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Require an interpreter
  • Have a medical diagnosis of any of the following:

    • Alzheimer's
    • Schizophrenia/other psychotic disorders
    • Dementia
    • Autism spectrum disorder
    • Known terminal illness with less than 6 months to live
    • Acute medical problem requiring immediate hospitalization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Participants will receive treatment as usual (TAU).
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Experimental: ElderTree on laptop (ET- LT)
Participants will receive ElderTree on a laptop.

ElderTree (ET) is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.

ET is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS). ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type. ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support. ET-LT arm will access ET on Laptop (ET- LT)

Experimental: ElderTree on smart system (ET- SS)
Participants will receive ElderTree on a smart system.

ElderTree (ET) is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.

ET is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS). ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type. ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support.

ElderTree on smart system (ET- SS) will use voice-activated "smart" speakers connected to the Internet. Because they are used by talking and listening rather than typing and reading, many barriers associated with laptop use can be avoided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of anxiety, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of depression collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Pain interference 4a score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of pain interference, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Ability to participate in social roles and activities 4a score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of one's ability to participate in social roles and other activities, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of logons in ET per week
Time Frame: up to 8 months
Amount of ET use will be calculated by number of logons in the ET portal.
up to 8 months
Change in PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Physical Function - Short Form 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of overall health, level of physical disability and general well-being, collected as part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions with a possible score of four to 16. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (FDI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
FDI evaluates self-reported difficulty a person has in performing activities of daily living tasks. There are 32 items with response options of "none," "a little," "some," "quite a lot," and "cannot do." An additional eight items for participants who use a walking device. Scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of functioning.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in the score of Lorig communication with physician scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Lorig Communication with Physicians scale is a 3-item scale used to determine how patients prepare for visits with their healthcare provider as well as communication utilized during their visit. Patients circle the number (0-5) that corresponds with how often they utilize the communication item being measured (0=never, 3=fairly often, 5=always, etc). The healthcare provider administering the scale finds the mean of the items circled to determine the score of the scale. Higher scores correspondence to more preparedness for physician visit
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
The World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a short self-reported measure of current mental wellbeing. The WHO-5 consists of five statements, which respondents rate from 'All of the time = 5' to 'At no time = 0'. The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Lorig Health Distress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Lorig Health Distress Scale is a self-reported measure. It has questions about how participant feel and how things have been during the past month. It is a 4 item scale. Each item can be score from 0-none of the time to 5- all the time. Higher scores corresponds to more amount of time the participant has been distressed about health (e.g., discouraged, worried, fearful, frustrated by health problems).
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Survey scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months

NIH Toolbox Loneliness Survey is a self-report measure that assesses perceptions of loneliness.

Participants rate items on a 5-point scale, with options ranging from never (1) to always (5). This creates a raw score, which is then converted to a t-score, with higher scores indicating greater levels of loneliness.

Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Number of participants with 30-day readmits
Time Frame: up to 8 months
Data will be collected from electronic health record
up to 8 months
Change in the Brief Irritability Test (BITe) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Brief Irritability Test (BITe) is a 5-item measure of irritability. Irritability is the proneness and susceptibility towards states of frustration and annoyance despite little provocation. The test consists of 5 items. Each item can be answered from Never = 1, Rarely = 2, Sometimes = 3, Often = 4, Very Often = 5, Always = 6. Total score ranges from 5-30. Higher score corresponds to higher irritability
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in PROMIS Pain Intensity Item
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of pain intensity, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. This is a single question, with a possible score of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 4a score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of fatigue, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep disturbance 4a score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Participant reported measure of sleep disturbance, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile. There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David H. Gustafson, PhD, UW-Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0868
  • ENGR/INDUSTRIAL ENGR (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • A195000 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • Protocol Version 10/20/2021 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 1R18HS026853-01A1 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Treatment as usual (TAU)

3
Subscribe