SHAPES: Supporting Multimorbid Older People

July 27, 2023 updated by: Prof Michael Scott

A Non-randomised Pilot Study of the Smart and Healthy Ageing Through People Engaging in Supportive Systems (SHAPES) Digital App and Platform for Supporting Medicines Optimisation in Older Individuals With Multiple Long-term Conditions

The Smart & Healthy Ageing through People Engaging in Supportive Systems (SHAPES) Innovation Action is a Horizon 2020, EU-wide project looking at how technology can enable the older population to live healthier lives at home. It involves the development, piloting and deployment of a large scale, EU-standardised open platform. This platform will integrate with a wide-range of technological, organisational, clinical, educational and societal solutions seeking to facilitate long-term healthy and active aging.

Within this project are 7 pilot themes investigating various potential uses of the platform, in Northern Ireland we are leading on medicines control and optimisation.

This pilot is focused on identifying, managing and improving deficiencies in adherence to medicines and treatments of older individuals living with permanent or temporary reduced functions or capabilities due to chronic, age-related illnesses and living at home. Digital Solutions (including blood pressure monitors, pulse oximeters, weight scales and glucometers) will be used to enable self-monitoring of the individual's physiological parameters. Data will also be used to develop an algorithm to help predict decompensations in participants with heart failure and dynamic personal ranges will also be developed. In the future this may enable early opportunities to adjust medicines and treatments so as to deliver safer and more effective use of medicines in-home, however, in this pilot there will be no changes to treatment.

The target population is composed of older individuals (+65 years) living at home with heart failure and/or diabetes. We aim to recruit 30 people (for 3 months) to our pilot in Northern Ireland. We are working closely with colleagues in Spain, Czech Republic, Cyprus and Germany to run similar pilots within their healthcare systems.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antrim, United Kingdom, BT41 2RL
        • Medicines Optimisation Innovation Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Northern Health and Social Care Trust service user
  • ≥60 years
  • Diagnosed with heart failure and/or diabetes mellitus (treatment includes regular self-monitoring of blood glucose)
  • Lives at home or in supported living accommodation (category 1 or 2).

    • Category 1 - self-contained accommodation for the more active elderly, which may include an element of scheme supervisor support and/or additional communal facilities
    • Category 2 - scheme supervisor supported self-contained accommodation for the less active elderly, which includes the full range of communal facilities
  • Has stable self-reported Wi-Fi connection at home
  • Has access to an appropriate android smartphone or tablet
  • Android device running version 8 or above; supports Wi-Fi; supports BLE; front facing camera for facial recognition
  • Self-reported stable disease state, the participant feels well enough to take part in the pilot
  • Self-reported confident user of smartphone/tablet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant report of cognitive impairment
  • Wears an electronic medical device or implant (e.g. pacemaker, electrocardiogram)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention
The intervention being piloted in this study is a novel system of supporting older individuals with multiple long-term conditions to self-manage their chronic conditions through the daily use of a digital health product that can also facilitate the remote monitoring of a person's health status.
Participants will be asked to use the app and connected devices daily for 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' engagement with the SHAPES app during the pilot
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
The number of times the app is opened per day
3 months (end of pilot)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' user experience with the SHAPES app
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured using the User Experience Questionnaire -short version (UEQ-S) A score of -3 to 3 is generated for each participant. A higher score indicates a positive user experience.
3 months (end of pilot)
Usability of the SHAPES app
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured using the System Usability Scale A score of 0 to 100 is generated for each participant. A higher score indicates better usability.
3 months (end of pilot)
Number and rate of successful registrations of each clinical parameter per participant, per day
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)

Measured by determining the number of successful registrations of each clinical parameter, per participant, per day (i.e., actual measure of clinical parameter is not relevant to this outcome).

Findings presented as a percentage of total number of expected registrations a day i.e., 0 to 100% success rate for each parameter.

3 months (end of pilot)
Number and rate of control limits (upper and lower) successfully generated by the 'Vitals Control' analytic tool per person
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Rate defined as number of pairs of limits generated per week during the pilot
3 months (end of pilot)
Number and rate of heart failure decompensation prediction (HFPred) risk scores successfully generated per person
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Rate defined as number of scores generated per week during the pilot
3 months (end of pilot)
Change in hospitalisation rate per person (hospitalisations/month) and A&E attendance rate (attendance/month)
Time Frame: Three months prior to baseline compared with 3 months during the pilot
Change in hospitalisation rate per person (hospitalisations/month) and A&E attendance rate (attendance/month)
Three months prior to baseline compared with 3 months during the pilot
Participants' self-reported medication adherence
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) A score between 5 and 25 is generated for each participant. A higher score indicates better adherence.
Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)
Participants' beliefs about medicines
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)

Measured using the Belief's about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) There are two scales in this outcome. The Necessity Scale assesses beliefs about personal need for medicines. The Concerns Scale assesses medication concerns.

A score between 5-25 is generated for each scale for each participant.

The two scores are amalgamated to produce the Necessity Concerns Differential (subtract Concerns Score from the Necessity Score) to give a score between -20 and 20. Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in the necessity of medication and fewer concerns about taking it.

Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)
Correlation between participants' self-reported medication adherence and beliefs about medicines
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)

The correlation between participants' self-reported medication adherence as measured using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (see outcome 8) and their Belief's about Medicine's Questionnaire- Necessity Concerns Differential (see outcome 9) will be measured statistically using an appropriate correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation coefficient OR Spearman's Rank Order correlation coefficient).

Note: the study will not be powered to show statistical significance of the correlation but will indicate a possible strength and direction of the relationship.

3 months (end of pilot)
Number and rate (score/week) of heart failure decompensation prediction (HFPred) risk scores successfully generated per person during the pilot
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Number and rate of heart failure decompensation scores generated
3 months (end of pilot)
Correlation between HFPred scores and unscheduled care during the pilot
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)

An appropriate statistical test will be performed to determine whether, or not, there is a correlation between incidence of unscheduled care use (unscheduled care defined as composite of hospitalisations, A&E attendances, specialist contacts, out-of-hours contacts) and heart failure decompensation prediction (HFPred) risk scores.

Note: the study will not be powered to show statistical significance of the correlation but will indicate a possible strength and direction of the relationship.

3 months (end of pilot)
Health-related quality of life as measured using the EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) descriptive system and visual analogue scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)

The EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire will be used to describe the five dimensions of health related quality of life (MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN /DISCOMFORT and ANXIETY / DEPRESSION) for each participant.

Each of the five dimensions comprising the EQ-5D descriptive system is divided into five levels of perceived problems:

LEVEL 1: indicating no problem LEVEL 2: indicating slight problems LEVEL 3: indicating moderate problems LEVEL 4: indicating severe problems LEVEL 5: indicating unable to/extreme problems.

A unique health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. A total of 3125 possible health states is defined in this way. Each state is referred to by a 5-digit code.

The visual analogue scale records the participants' self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale between 0 and 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived health.

Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)
Exploration of healthcare practitioners' views on integration and alignment of the SHAPES platform and Digital Solutions with current care pathways
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured via qualitative interview
3 months (end of pilot)
Exploration of healthcare practitioners' views about their trust and acceptance of the SHAPES platform and Digital Solutions
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured via qualitative interview
3 months (end of pilot)
Exploration of participants' views about their trust and acceptance of the SHAPES app
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured via qualitative interview
3 months (end of pilot)
Exploration of user engagement behaviors
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured via cross-comparative exploratory analysis of user event logs and qualitative interviews with participants.
3 months (end of pilot)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability of the SHAPES app
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured using the System Usability Scale A score of 0 to 100 is generated for each participant. A higher score indicates better usability.
3 months (end of pilot)
Health-related quality of life as measured using the EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) descriptive system and visual analogue scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)

The EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire will be used to describe the five dimensions of health related quality of life (MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN /DISCOMFORT and ANXIETY / DEPRESSION) for each participant.

Each of the five dimensions comprising the EQ-5D descriptive system is divided into five levels of perceived problems:

LEVEL 1: indicating no problem LEVEL 2: indicating slight problems LEVEL 3: indicating moderate problems LEVEL 4: indicating severe problems LEVEL 5: indicating unable to/extreme problems.

A unique health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. A total of 3125 possible health states is defined in this way. Each state is referred to by a 5-digit code.

The visual analogue scale records the participants' self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale between 0 and 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived health.

Baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)
Exploration of healthcare practitioners' views about their trust and acceptance of the SHAPES platform and Digital Solutions
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured via qualitative interview
3 months (end of pilot)
Participants' self-efficacy as measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Measured using the general self-efficacy scale. A score between 10 and 40 is generated, with a higher score indicating more/better self-efficacy.
Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Participants' extent of social support
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Measured using the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3). A score between 3 and 14 is generated with high values representing strong levels and low values representing poor levels of social support.
Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Participants' health literacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Measured using the Single-item Health Literacy Measure (HLM1)
Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Participation in society
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Measured using non-validated participation questions
Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Participants' quality of life score as measured using the World Health Organization Brief Quality of life tool (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. A score between 0 and 100 is generated. Higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Baseline, 3 months (end of pilot) and follow-up (further 3 months)
Technology Acceptance
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured using technology acceptance questions
3 months (end of pilot)
Exploration of participants' views about their trust and acceptance of the SHAPES platform and Digital Solutions
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
Measured via qualitative interview
3 months (end of pilot)
Change in health service utilisation for unscheduled care related to heart failure and diabetes
Time Frame: 3 months prior to baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)

Measured by number of: hospitalisations; A&E attendances; out of hours contacts; contacts with specialist services.

  • Number of hospitalisations
  • A&E attendances
  • Out of hours contacts
  • Contacts with specialist services
3 months prior to baseline and 3 months (end of pilot)
Economic impact of the intervention
Time Frame: 3 months (end of pilot)
as measured by comparing the cost of the intervention (devices, SHAPES platform and digital solutions; staffing) versus the cost of unscheduled care related to heart failure and diabetes during the pilot.
3 months (end of pilot)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NT21-SHAPES
  • 857159 (Other Grant/Funding Number: European Union's Horizon 2020 research&innovation programme)
  • 284743 (Other Identifier: IRAS number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on SHAPES app

Subscribe