Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Features and Outcomes of Patients With Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy - a Retrospective Follow-up From Pakistan

March 7, 2022 updated by: Pirbhat Shams, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
Objective: To evaluate clinical characteristics, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features, and outcomes of patients with left ventricle non-compaction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Left Ventricle Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy (LVNCC) is a type of myocardial disease characterized by prominent myocardial trabeculae and recesses resulting in two distinct layers of myocardium: compacted layer and the non-compacted layer. It arises due to the failure of left ventricle (LV) maturation and compaction during intra-uterine life (1). As per the position statement from the European Society of Cardiology, LVNCC has been labelled as 'unclassified' type of cardiomyopathy. Clinical course can be complicated by heart failure, thromboembolism, or arrhythmia.

Phenotypic presentation of LVNC can range from extremely thickened layer of non-compacted myocardium to mere presence of prominent trabeculae and recesses albeit a compacted myocardium. Transthoracic echocardiography is the first tool to diagnose LVNC. However, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging has emerged as a strong tool to differentiate between LVNCC from mere hyper-trabeculated LV myocardium when echocardiogram is inconclusive (Figure 1 and Video 1). Various criteria have evolved to diagnose LVNC by CMR. Peterson et al defined the end-diastole non-compacted to compacted myocardium ratio of >2.3 to have good sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for differentiating pathological non-compaction from hyper-trabeculation.

With an increase in the use of diagnostic cardiovascular imaging modalities in South-Asian (SA) belt, LVNC is being increasingly diagnosed. The exact prevalence of LVNC in SA is not known and phenotypic CMR characteristics, clinical features, and outcomes of LVNC remain unknown for SA population. This brought us to the need of analysing CMR data of LVNC at our centre.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

294

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We retrospectively enrolled 294 patients referred for CMR from 2011 to 2020 for evaluation of cardiomyopathy. Of these, 51% were ischemic cardiomyopathy, 26% were dilated cardiomyopathy, 25% were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 13% were restrictive cardiomyopathy, and 6% were arrhythmogenic right ventricle dysplasia. For final enrolment, patients with intracardiac masses, pericardial diseases and congenital heart diseases were excluded from the study. Patients with evidence of LV non-compaction were further analysed for baseline characteristics, CMR parameters and outcomes. Characteristics of this group were compared with 47 patients who had dilated cardiomyopathy without evidence of LV non-compaction.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years, referred for CMR for further evaluation of cardiomyopathy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with intracardiac masses, pericardial diseases and congenital heart diseases were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate clinical characteristics, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features, and outcomes of patients with left ventricle non-compaction.
Time Frame: 37 months
Evaluating CMR features and looking at outcomes such as all cause mortality, major heart failure or arrhythmia hospitalizations.
37 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause-mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and arrhythmia hospitalization.
Time Frame: 37 months
All cause-mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and arrhythmia hospitalization.
37 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-5594-14863

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Left Ventricle Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on Patients were retrospectively enrolled. This was a retrospective study and no intervention was performed.

3
Subscribe