The Effect of Working at Home to Reduce Risk of Respiratory Infection

March 25, 2022 updated by: Norwegian Institute of Public Health

The Effect of Working at Home Versus at the Office on Risk of Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Agents. A Randomized Controlled Trial

The researchers will recruit volunteers from various organisations who are willing and able to be randomised to either working from home for 4 weeks followed by working in the office for 4 weeks, or vice versa. The goal is to assess whether working from home has an impact on the risk of symptoms of respiratory infection.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Working in the office entails to various extent contact with colleagues, and for some it includes close contact to others when using public transport to and from work. This likely increases the risk of transmission and many workplaces along with health authorities have strongly advised employees to work from home as much as possible during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, most people are infected from other family members, and working from home increases exposure to other family members.

There are few, if any trials on the effects of teleworking/home office on the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory agents. Studies that have looked at associations between teleworking and COVID-19 have found a negative correlation.

A systematic review from the National Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI) showed that workers working from home experienced higher work satisfaction and productivity, while also reporting negative effects on work-life balance, professional isolation and working outside core hours. Effects on health outcomes were mixed. The quality of the studies was generally judged as low.

However, working at the office could mean increased exposure to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory agents. Thus, both interventions do pose potential benefits and harms for the participants.

Working from home is a broadly applied intervention nationally and internationally during the COVID-19 pandemic. Establishing what effect this intervention has on actual spread of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory agents could hence provide valuable insight to national and local authorities and decision-makers.

The researchers propose to conduct a trial to assess whether working at home impacts on employees' risk of respiratory infection and reduce the risk of work-related outbreaks. The aim is to reject the null hypothesis that working at home does not reduce the risk of respiratory infections or outbreaks among employees.

The researchers plan to conduct the trial as a two-arm multi-period crossover superiority trial where the employees are allocated into two equally sized groups. If this eases the recruitment of firms, the cross-over structure will be dropped.

The first and second arm will cross-over (change treatment) after four weeks. Week 1 and week 5 will be considered run-in periods for these arms, and the data collected these run-in weeks will not be used as outcome data in the statistical analysis.

The plan is to recruit 3-5 large firms with over 2000 eligible participants. Firms located in Oslo and neighbouring municipalities will be included. These are the areas That are seeing the highest incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 in the ongoing covid-19 pandemic in Norway.

All consenting employees in the selected organizations are eligible to participate in the trial. The organizations can define in advance certain key personnel that cannot take part in the trial.

The investigators will compare the following interventions:

  1. Participants will strive to be working from home every day. Participants can go to the office in order to complete tasks that cannot be completed from home.
  2. Participants will be working from the office most days, but at least three days a week.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Employee in a company/organisation that has agreed to let their employees take part
  • Willing and able to work form home for 4 weeks (most of the time)

Exclusion crieria:

- Unable to work from home

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home office for first 4 weeks, and office for the last 4 weeks
Participants will work from home for first 4 weeks, and at the office for the last 4 weeks
Working from home
Working at the office
Active Comparator: Office for first 4 weeks, and home office for the last 4 weeks
Participants will work at the office for the first 4 weeks, and from home during the last 4 weeks
Working from home
Working at the office

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory infection
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The proportion of participants who report having had symptoms of respiratory disease
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
COVID-19
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Proportion of participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 (based on both self-reported and registry data)
8 weeks
Absenteeism
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Number of days of absence from work.
8 weeks
Secondary cases of respiratory infection
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Number of secondary cases (transmission from participants in the study) or outbreaks (2 or more cases)
8 weeks
Work-satisfaction
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Self-reported work-satisfaction (Question: To what extent were you able to carry out your work in a good way during the last week? 5-unit ordinal scale from Very little to Very much).
8 weeks
Work-life balance.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Perceived work-life balance (Question: To what extent has your work been at the expense of your own or other family members' free time?) Ordinal 5-unit scale from Very little to Very much.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Atle Fretheim, PhD, Head of Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research (CEIR)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The intention is to enable sharing of an anonymised dataset with all interested parties.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After reporting of the trial findings, estimated to June 2023.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Tract Infections

Clinical Trials on Home office

3
Subscribe