Quick Epidural Top-up With Alkalinized Lidocaine for Emergent Caesarean Delivery (QETAL)

May 11, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Alkalinization of Adrenalized Lidocaine in Extending Epidural Analgesia for Extremely Urgent Cesarean Section During Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Prospective randomized study comparing the use of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate and lidocaine 2% with epinephrine as epidural top-up for extremely urgent cesarean section during labour.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

General anesthesia in pregnant women remains burdened by a significant maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality. An increased risk of orotracheal intubation difficulty, gastric inhalation syndrome and neonatal respiratory depression is described.

The rate of epidural analgesia during labor is about 85% in France. In addition to the comfort provided, epidural analgesia allows emergency Caesarean sections to be performed by converting epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia, a technique known as "epidural extension" or "epidural top-up". The effectiveness and the time necessary to obtain this surgical anesthesia depends on the protocols used and determines the possibility of performing fetal extractions, even the most urgent ones, without resorting to general anesthesia.

We define an extremely urgent cesarean delivery as a delivery required in the event of an immediate threat to maternal or fetal vital prognosis, with a target of less than 15 minutes between the extraction decision time and birth.

In France, the latest recommendations date from 2007 and recommend the practice of epidural extension with 15 to 20 ml of 2% adrenaline lidocaine. With this technique, surgical anesthesia is typically obtained within 10 to 15 minutes. This time remains too long in certain obstetrical emergency situations, notably extremely urgent cesarean sections, which require frequent recourse to general anesthesia to compensate for this length of nerve block installation.

The alkalinization of local anesthetics with sodium bicarbonate has been experimentally studied since the 1970s and makes it possible to accelerate the time of action of local anesthetics. Alkalinization of local anesthetics is practiced in 35% of epidural extensions in Denmark and 12% of epidural extensions in the United Kingdom.

Since 2016, this technique has been used in the anesthesia departments of maternity units of Bayonne and Bordeaux hospitals. In the former, a retrospective study of 51 cases from January 2019 to July 2019 showed a decrease of more than 80% in the rate of recourse to general anesthesia in extremely urgent caesarean sections (4/4 vs 0/7) and a 50% decrease in the time required to obtain adequate epidural anesthesia (5 min vs 10 min).

The main objective of the current prospective study is to prospectively confirm the decrease in the use of general anesthesia in extremely urgent cesarean sections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bayonne, France
        • CH de la Côte Basque
      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU de Bordeaux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, affiliated to social security
  • Informed consent signed by the participant and the investigating physician at the latest after the therapeutic intervention
  • Initial indication for vaginal delivery
  • Benefiting from emergency caesarean section during labour for fetal extraction with a maximum 15-minute decision-to-delivery delay (i.e. extremely urgent caesarean section)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opposition to participation in research before delivery
  • Refusal or impossibility of informed consent
  • Lack of understanding or significant language barrier
  • Initial indication for general anaesthesia defined by the following situations: non-functional epidural analgesia, altered consciousness, eclampsia, suspicion of amniotic embolism, confirmed or suspected severe haemorrhage occurring before birth
  • Contraindication to the use of the products defined in the protocol : adrenalized lidocaine ; sodium bicarbonate.
  • Persons placed under judicial protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
In this arm patients will receive for epidural extension a Lidocaine epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate.
When an extremely urgent fetal extraction by caesarean section is decided, the patient will be randomized. An epidural top-up will then be performed with Lidocaine epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate.
Active Comparator: Comparator group
In this arm patients will receive for epidural extension only Lidocaine epinephrine.
When an extremely urgent fetal extraction by caesarean section is decided, the patient will be randomized. An epidural top-up will then be performed with Lidocaine epinephrine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resort to general anaesthesia
Time Frame: 15 minutes after inclusion
Resort to general anaesthesia for insufficient analgesia after epidural extension for extremely urgent caesarean section.
15 minutes after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delay between fetal extraction decision and birth
Time Frame: Between inclusion and birth
Minutes between the decision to extract the fetus by the obstetrical team and the clamping of the umbilical cord
Between inclusion and birth
Delay between fetal extraction decision and incision
Time Frame: Between inclusion and cesarean section
Minutes between the decision to extract the fetus by the obstetrical team and the surgical incision
Between inclusion and cesarean section
Maternal complications
Time Frame: up to 24 hours after inclusion
Maternal complications after epidural top-up, including nausea-vomiting in the peroperative and postoperative period, desaturation episode, difficult orotracheal intubation, bronchial inhalation syndrome, hypotensive episode before fetal extraction, extended sensory or motor block.
up to 24 hours after inclusion
Complementary medicines
Time Frame: Between inclusion and cesarean section
Use and characterization of complementary medicines necessary for maternal well-being during caesarean section.
Between inclusion and cesarean section
Postpartum hemorrhage
Time Frame: up to 24 hours after inclusion
Postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss of more than 500 ml)
up to 24 hours after inclusion
Paediatric wellness
Time Frame: at birth
Paediatric wellness criteria (umbilical cord pH less than 7.0 ; umbilical cord lactate)
at birth
Anesthesia level
Time Frame: one hour after surgical incision
Anesthesia level one hour after surgical incision
one hour after surgical incision
Maternal satisfaction
Time Frame: up to 4 hours after inclusion
Maternal satisfaction regarding analgesia and anesthesia during caesarean section.
up to 4 hours after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Antoine BENARD, Dr, University Hospital, Bordeaux
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas LECHAT, Dr, University Hospital, Bordeaux
  • Study Director: Karine NOUETTE-GAULAIN, Pr, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstetric Labor Complications

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate

Subscribe