S-11 SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid and Cementless Finned Short Stem

March 29, 2022 updated by: Limacorporate S.p.a

A Multicentre, Prospective Clinical Study Analysing Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty With SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid With or Without SMR Cementless Finned Short Stem

Post-market, prospective, non randomized, open label, multicentre, clinical study analysing outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty with SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid with or without SMR Cementless Finned Short Stem

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Orthopedic Clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:(Key)

  • Both genders;
  • Age ≥ 18 years old;
  • Full skeletal maturity;
  • Life expectancy over 5 years;
  • Patient is requiring primary unilateral arthroplasty based on physical examination and medical history;
  • Good bone quality evaluated by the Investigator and the intraoperative evaluation;
  • A diagnosis in the target shoulder of one or more of the S-11 SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid and Cementless Finned Short Stem Version Sep 2021 2.0 Confidential Page11 following:

    1. Primary osteoarthritis;
    2. Secondary osteoarthritis;
    3. Post-traumatic arthritis;
    4. Rheumatoid arthritis;
    5. Avascular necrosis
    6. acute fractures of the humeral head that cannot be treated with other fracture fixation methods;
    7. cuff tear arthropathy (only in combination with CTA Heads);
    8. Glenoid arthrosis without excessive glenoid bone loss: A1, A2 and B1 according to Walch classification.

Exclusion Criteria (Key):

  • Patient requiring revision shoulder arthroplasty;
  • Osteoporosis with a history of non-traumatic fractures;
  • Steroid injections within the previous 3 months;
  • Contralateral shoulder replacement within the previous 3 months;
  • Significant proven or suspicious infection of the target shoulder or any serious infectious disease before the study according to the Investigator;
  • Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that may compromise functional recovery;
  • Not recovered axillary nerve palsy;
  • Non functioning deltoid muscle;
  • Known or suspicious hypersensitivity to the metal or other components and materials of the implant;
  • Participation in any experimental drug/device study within the 6 months prior to the preoperative visit;
  • Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant.

These are key eligibility criteria, other eligibility criteria apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid without Cementless Finned Short Stem
Patients implanted with SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid without Cementless Finned Short Stem
The subject SMR Hybrid Glenoid System and SMR cementless finned short stem is intended for both primary or revision anatomic and reverse shoulder joint replacement. The glenoid components when used as part of an anatomic shoulder replacement are intended for cemented fixation.
SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid with Cementless Finned Short Stem
Patients implanted with SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid with Cementless Finned Short Stem

The subject SMR Hybrid Glenoid System and SMR cementless finned short stem is intended for both primary or revision anatomic and reverse shoulder joint replacement. The glenoid components when used as part of an anatomic shoulder replacement are intended for cemented fixation.

The fins are intended to enhance press-fit fixation. The same proximal morse taper is used for coupling to the same humeral bodies in the SMR Shoulder System. The SMR finned short stem is intended for cementless fixation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients reaching a clinical progression from baseline to 24-month follow-up
Time Frame: 24 Months

The primary endpoint consists of the proportion of patients reaching a clinical progression from baseline to 24-month follow-up measured as:

  • Constant score improvement of greater than 10;
  • Adjusted Constant score greater than or equal to 54.
24 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES)
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
The ASES questionnaire is composed of both a physician-rated component and a patient-reported component. The patient questions focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition.
Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Measure Oxford shoulder score
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a 12-item patient-reported PRO specifically designed and developed for assessing outcomes of shoulder surgery.
Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Measure Constant Score
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function.
Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Measure Simple Shoulder Test
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Simple Shoulder Test (SST) is a series of 12 "yes" or "no" questions the patient answers about the function of the involved shoulder. The answers to these questions provides a standardized way of recording the function of a shoulder before and after treatment. The difference between the shoulder function before treatment and after the recovery period is the effectiveness of the treatment.
Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Measure Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
The satisfaction of the patients with regard to the effectiveness of the prosthetic treatment is graded on a scale from 1 to 5
Baseline to 24 and 60 Months
Stability of the SMR TT hybrid glenoid component with or without SMR cementless finned short stem
Time Frame: Immediately postoperative to 24 Months
Rate of symptomatic radiolucent lines, loosening and subsidence ≥2 mm
Immediately postoperative to 24 Months
System conversion rate, intended as a conversion within the SMR system from anatomic to reverse
Time Frame: 24 Months
The SMR shoulder system is a modular system and in case of evolution of the pathology it may be easily converted from one configuration to another.
24 Months
Failure rate, intended as removal of the SMR TT hybrid glenoid component
Time Frame: Immediately postoperative to 24 Months
A removal of the glenoid component is intended as a revision and a failure of the implant.
Immediately postoperative to 24 Months
Failure rate, intended as removal of the SMR cementless finned short stem
Time Frame: Immediately postoperative to 24 Months
A removal of the stem component is intended as a revision and a failure of the implant.
Immediately postoperative to 24 Months
Incidence of device-related AE/SAE (ADE/SADE)
Time Frame: Immediately postoperative to 24 and 60 Months
Device Related Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events, device deficiencies, malfunctions and use errors at all follow-up time points
Immediately postoperative to 24 and 60 Months
Survival rate (Kaplan-Meier)
Time Frame: 60 Months
60 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Subscribe