- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05333575
Lullaby and Classic Music's Effect on Vital Findings and Comfort
April 11, 2022 updated by: Sibel Küçükoğlu, Selcuk University
The Effect of Lullaby and Classic Music to Prematures During Orogastric Tub Feeding on the Baby's Cerebral Oxygenization, Vital Findings and Comfort
In the study, lullabies and classical music played to preterm babies during orogastric tube feeding; It will be tried to determine the effect on cerebral oxygenation level, vital signs and comfort levels.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In the literature, there are many studies on prematurity pain and its relief.
Although the vital signs and comfort levels of infants were examined in many applications for infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit, no study was found in which the cerebral oxygenation levels of infants were evaluated by NIRS by listening to lullabies and classical music to premature infants.
There is no study in the literature examining cerebral oxygenation, vital signs and comfort parameters together during orogastric tube feeding, which is frequently used in preterm infants.
For this reason, in this study, lullabies and classical music played to preterm babies during orogastric tube feeding; It will be tried to determine the effect on cerebral oxygenation level, vital signs and comfort levels.
It is thought that the study will present new data to the literature and will lead many researches.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
51
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Konya, Turkey, 42100
- Selcuk University
-
Konya, Turkey, 42100
- Sibel Küçükoğlu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
6 months to 7 months (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being at 28-34 weeks of gestation,
- Stability (in terms of cerebral oxygenation, pain and vital signs) during enrollment,
- Not having any additional diagnosis other than the diagnosis of prematurity,
- Indication of bolus feeding with an orogastric tube,
Exclusion Criteria:
- Congenital anomaly in the baby
- Diagnosed hearing impairment in the baby
- Having a history of an invasive procedure (such as a surgical operation) that will disrupt the baby's long-term comfort and cause pain
- The baby is receiving oxygen therapy or the baby is on mechanical ventilation
- Any history of disease affecting cerebral oxygenation (such as intraventricular hemorrhage, neonatal convulsions).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group: Lullaby
The mothers in this group sang lullabies to their babies next to the incubator during feeding.
|
The mothers in this group were asked to sing a lullaby while their babies were fed with an orogastric tube.
Mothers were released on lullabies.
They were encouraged to sing the lullaby they knew or loved the most.
The mother was given a sound decibel meter.
Mothers were asked to do an application before going to the baby.
It was taught that the number of sound decibels should not exceed 40 decibels while singing a lullaby.
Later, the mother was taken to the baby's incubator at feeding time.
She was seated in a chair.
The working status of the decibel meter was checked and given to the mother.
When the feeding started, the mother started singing lullabies and continued to sing until the feeding was finished.
Attention was paid to aseptic techniques during all procedures.
A single mother was asked to sing a lullaby at each feeding, and the baby of the mother who sang only a lullaby was included in the study.
|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group: Classic Music
Babies in this group were listened to classical music during feeding.
|
The babies in this group were given classical music recitals during feeding.
The classical music piece Mozart-Baby Smart was preferred because it was seen to be used in the literature (Keidar 2014).
Mozart-Baby Smart was loaded into the music player by the researcher before the feeding process.
Before feeding, the decibel meter was disinfected by surface disinfectant and placed on sterile sponge in an incubator 10 cm away from the baby's head.
The music player was turned on, not exceeding 40 decibels, by adjusting the decibel meter at the time of starting the feeding, and classical music was continued during the feeding.
When the feeding was finished, the music player was turned off and the incubator was taken out.
Attention was paid to acetic techniques during all procedures.
Ambient sounds were tried to be controlled as much as possible so that the baby would not be affected by different sounds when listening to classical music.
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Premature newborns in the control group were fed according to the routine of the clinic and no intervention was performed other than routine practice.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Newborn Information Form
Time Frame: First measurement - Before intervention
|
This form was developed by the researcher using the literature (Loewy et al 2013, Caparros-Gonzalez et al 2018, Azarmnejad et al 2015, Alipour et al 2013).
The form was composed of questions including introductory information about the baby, gestational age, postnatal age, gender, birth weight (gr), weight on the day of the intervention, type of delivery, 1st and 5th min apgar score.
|
First measurement - Before intervention
|
|
Regional brain oxygen saturation (rSO2) levels
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's rSO2 levels were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
|
Heart rate (minute)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as heart rate (min) were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
|
Oxygen saturation (%SpO2)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as Oxygen saturation (%SpO2) were recorded..
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
|
Body temperature (°C)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's body temperature (°C) were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
|
Respiratory rate (min)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's respiratory rate (min) were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
|
COMFORTneo Scale
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
The scale is a Likert type scale developed to determine the pain, distress, sedation and comfort needs of newborns followed in the intensive care unit.
Ambuel et al. created the Comfort Scale in 1992 to evaluate the distress of children receiving mechanical ventilator support in pediatric intensive care units.
Van Dijk et al. revised the scale in 2009 and made the validity and reliability of the COMFORTneo scale only to measure newborn behavior without vital parameters.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Kahraman et al. in 2014.
The lowest score that can be obtained from the Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale is 6, and the highest score is 30.
High scores indicate that the baby is not comfortable and needs interventions to provide comfort.
|
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Regional brain oxygen saturation (rSO2) levels
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as Oxygen saturation (%SpO2) were recorded..
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
|
Heart rate (minute)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as heart rate (min) were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
|
Oxygen saturation (%SpO2)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as Oxygen saturation (%SpO2) were recorded..
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
|
Body temperature (°C)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's body temperature (°C) were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
|
Respiratory rate (min)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's respiratory rate (min) were recorded.
The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
|
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
|
COMFORTneo Scale
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
The scale is a Likert type scale developed to determine the pain, distress, sedation and comfort needs of newborns followed in the intensive care unit.
Ambuel et al. created the Comfort Scale in 1992 to evaluate the distress of children receiving mechanical ventilator support in pediatric intensive care units.
Van Dijk et al. revised the scale in 2009 and made the validity and reliability of the COMFORTneo scale only to measure newborn behavior without vital parameters.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Kahraman et al. in 2014.
The lowest score that can be obtained from the Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale is 6, and the highest score is 30.
High scores indicate that the baby is not comfortable and needs interventions to provide comfort.
|
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Sibel Kucukoglu, PhD, Selcuk University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- van Dijk M, Roofthooft DW, Anand KJ, Guldemond F, de Graaf J, Simons S, de Jager Y, van Goudoever JB, Tibboel D. Taking up the challenge of measuring prolonged pain in (premature) neonates: the COMFORTneo scale seems promising. Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):607-16. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a5b52a.
- Loewy J, Stewart K, Dassler AM, Telsey A, Homel P. The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants. Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):902-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1367. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
- Alipour Z, Eskandari N, Ahmari Tehran H, Eshagh Hossaini SK, Sangi S. Effects of music on physiological and behavioral responses of premature infants: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(3):128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 May 9.
- Keidar HR, Mandel D, Mimouni FB, Lubetzky R. Bach music in preterm infants: no 'Mozart effect' on resting energy expenditure. J Perinatol. 2014 Feb;34(2):153-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.138. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
- Caparros-Gonzalez RA, de la Torre-Luque A, Diaz-Piedra C, Vico FJ, Buela-Casal G. Listening to Relaxing Music Improves Physiological Responses in Premature Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Adv Neonatal Care. 2018 Feb;18(1):58-69. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000448.
- Azarmnejad E, Sarhangi F, Javadi M, Rejeh N. The Effect of Mother's Voice on Arterial Blood Sampling Induced Pain in Neonates Hospitalized in Neonate Intensive Care Unit. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Apr 19;7(6):198-204. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p198.
- Kahraman A, Başbakkal Z, Yalaz M, 2014. Yenidoğan Konfor Davranış Ölçeği'nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Uluslararası Hakemli Hemşirelik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 2, 1-11.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 2, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 15, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
April 4, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 11, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
April 19, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 19, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 11, 2022
Last Verified
April 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SelcukUniversity
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
It will be shared after the article is published.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Music
-
Liverpool John Moores UniversityCompletedWhole Body Vibration | Music Exposure | NoMusic - Control | Music Plus 15 Percent Tempo | WBV and MusicUnited Kingdom
-
University of Southern CaliforniaActive, not recruiting
-
Indiana UniversityNot yet recruitingMusic ExposureUnited States
-
Resmiye KAYA ODABAŞOndokuz Mayıs UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University Hospital, CaenCompletedMusic, Anesthetic, InductionFrance
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySteven & Alexandra Cohen FoundationEnrolling by invitationPsilocybin | Music InterventionUnited States
-
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University...Enrolling by invitation
-
Brown UniversityThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Lullaby
-
Celal Bayar UniversityNot yet recruitingNewborn | Breastfeeding | Music | MotherTurkey
-
National Yang Ming UniversityRecruiting
-
Ataturk UniversityCompleted
-
University Health Network, TorontoRecruitingEpilepsy | Pregnancy RelatedCanada
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Pregnancy Related | Attachment DisorderTurkey
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompleted
-
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityCompletedBreastfeeding Success in NewbornsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruitingSelf Efficacy | Bonding | Newborn Infant | Postpartum Depression (PPD)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity of GeorgiaTerminatedPreterm Birth | Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia | Chronic Lung Disease of Prematurity | Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature InfantUnited States
-
Coombe Women and Infants University HospitalCompletedPremature Brain Oxygenation