Lullaby and Classic Music's Effect on Vital Findings and Comfort

April 11, 2022 updated by: Sibel Küçükoğlu, Selcuk University

The Effect of Lullaby and Classic Music to Prematures During Orogastric Tub Feeding on the Baby's Cerebral Oxygenization, Vital Findings and Comfort

In the study, lullabies and classical music played to preterm babies during orogastric tube feeding; It will be tried to determine the effect on cerebral oxygenation level, vital signs and comfort levels.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the literature, there are many studies on prematurity pain and its relief. Although the vital signs and comfort levels of infants were examined in many applications for infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit, no study was found in which the cerebral oxygenation levels of infants were evaluated by NIRS by listening to lullabies and classical music to premature infants. There is no study in the literature examining cerebral oxygenation, vital signs and comfort parameters together during orogastric tube feeding, which is frequently used in preterm infants. For this reason, in this study, lullabies and classical music played to preterm babies during orogastric tube feeding; It will be tried to determine the effect on cerebral oxygenation level, vital signs and comfort levels. It is thought that the study will present new data to the literature and will lead many researches.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Konya, Turkey, 42100
        • Selcuk University
      • Konya, Turkey, 42100
        • Sibel Küçükoğlu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being at 28-34 weeks of gestation,
  • Stability (in terms of cerebral oxygenation, pain and vital signs) during enrollment,
  • Not having any additional diagnosis other than the diagnosis of prematurity,
  • Indication of bolus feeding with an orogastric tube,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital anomaly in the baby
  • Diagnosed hearing impairment in the baby
  • Having a history of an invasive procedure (such as a surgical operation) that will disrupt the baby's long-term comfort and cause pain
  • The baby is receiving oxygen therapy or the baby is on mechanical ventilation
  • Any history of disease affecting cerebral oxygenation (such as intraventricular hemorrhage, neonatal convulsions).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group: Lullaby
The mothers in this group sang lullabies to their babies next to the incubator during feeding.
The mothers in this group were asked to sing a lullaby while their babies were fed with an orogastric tube. Mothers were released on lullabies. They were encouraged to sing the lullaby they knew or loved the most. The mother was given a sound decibel meter. Mothers were asked to do an application before going to the baby. It was taught that the number of sound decibels should not exceed 40 decibels while singing a lullaby. Later, the mother was taken to the baby's incubator at feeding time. She was seated in a chair. The working status of the decibel meter was checked and given to the mother. When the feeding started, the mother started singing lullabies and continued to sing until the feeding was finished. Attention was paid to aseptic techniques during all procedures. A single mother was asked to sing a lullaby at each feeding, and the baby of the mother who sang only a lullaby was included in the study.
Experimental: Experimental Group: Classic Music
Babies in this group were listened to classical music during feeding.
The babies in this group were given classical music recitals during feeding. The classical music piece Mozart-Baby Smart was preferred because it was seen to be used in the literature (Keidar 2014). Mozart-Baby Smart was loaded into the music player by the researcher before the feeding process. Before feeding, the decibel meter was disinfected by surface disinfectant and placed on sterile sponge in an incubator 10 cm away from the baby's head. The music player was turned on, not exceeding 40 decibels, by adjusting the decibel meter at the time of starting the feeding, and classical music was continued during the feeding. When the feeding was finished, the music player was turned off and the incubator was taken out. Attention was paid to acetic techniques during all procedures. Ambient sounds were tried to be controlled as much as possible so that the baby would not be affected by different sounds when listening to classical music.
No Intervention: Control Group
Premature newborns in the control group were fed according to the routine of the clinic and no intervention was performed other than routine practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Newborn Information Form
Time Frame: First measurement - Before intervention
This form was developed by the researcher using the literature (Loewy et al 2013, Caparros-Gonzalez et al 2018, Azarmnejad et al 2015, Alipour et al 2013). The form was composed of questions including introductory information about the baby, gestational age, postnatal age, gender, birth weight (gr), weight on the day of the intervention, type of delivery, 1st and 5th min apgar score.
First measurement - Before intervention
Regional brain oxygen saturation (rSO2) levels
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's rSO2 levels were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
Heart rate (minute)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as heart rate (min) were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
Oxygen saturation (%SpO2)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as Oxygen saturation (%SpO2) were recorded.. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
Body temperature (°C)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's body temperature (°C) were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
Respiratory rate (min)
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's respiratory rate (min) were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
COMFORTneo Scale
Time Frame: First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed
The scale is a Likert type scale developed to determine the pain, distress, sedation and comfort needs of newborns followed in the intensive care unit. Ambuel et al. created the Comfort Scale in 1992 to evaluate the distress of children receiving mechanical ventilator support in pediatric intensive care units. Van Dijk et al. revised the scale in 2009 and made the validity and reliability of the COMFORTneo scale only to measure newborn behavior without vital parameters. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Kahraman et al. in 2014. The lowest score that can be obtained from the Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale is 6, and the highest score is 30. High scores indicate that the baby is not comfortable and needs interventions to provide comfort.
First measurement - one minute before the baby is fed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regional brain oxygen saturation (rSO2) levels
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as Oxygen saturation (%SpO2) were recorded.. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
Heart rate (minute)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as heart rate (min) were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
Oxygen saturation (%SpO2)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as Oxygen saturation (%SpO2) were recorded.. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
Body temperature (°C)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's body temperature (°C) were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
Respiratory rate (min)
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
The form prepared by the researcher; It was prepared in such a way that physiological parameters such as baby's respiratory rate (min) were recorded. The form is designed to record twice, 1 minute before the baby is fed and immediately after the feeding is completed.
Second measurement - immediately after feeding
COMFORTneo Scale
Time Frame: Second measurement - immediately after feeding
The scale is a Likert type scale developed to determine the pain, distress, sedation and comfort needs of newborns followed in the intensive care unit. Ambuel et al. created the Comfort Scale in 1992 to evaluate the distress of children receiving mechanical ventilator support in pediatric intensive care units. Van Dijk et al. revised the scale in 2009 and made the validity and reliability of the COMFORTneo scale only to measure newborn behavior without vital parameters. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Kahraman et al. in 2014. The lowest score that can be obtained from the Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale is 6, and the highest score is 30. High scores indicate that the baby is not comfortable and needs interventions to provide comfort.
Second measurement - immediately after feeding

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sibel Kucukoglu, PhD, Selcuk University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SelcukUniversity

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

It will be shared after the article is published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Music

Clinical Trials on Lullaby

Subscribe