VR-based Action Observation Treatment for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke: a Multimodal Study.

March 10, 2023 updated by: Pietro Avanzini, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Parma

The Upper-limb Functional Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients: From Neuroimaging and Bio-humoral Biomarkers of a Personalized Action Observation Treatment Based on Virtual Reality to a Maximized and Predictable Rehabilitative Outcome.

The loss of upper-limb motor functioning due to ischemic stroke has a negative impact on quality of life of patients. Action Observation Treatment (AOT), recently developed based on the mirror mechanism functioning, has proved effective in promoting plasticity into the motor system, ultimately boosting the motor recovery. The use of virtual reality further empowers the effectiveness of AOT, making the visual experience more first-person, and thus more realistic. A complete picture of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying AOT effectiveness is lacking to date, including the neuroradiological and biohumoral markers modulated by AOT, and their role in predicting the clinical outcome. Starting from these premises, the investigators propose a study aiming at evaluating the AOT effectiveness in post-stroke patients, and at identifying the biomarkers indexing the motor recovery process.

Sixty patients affected by ischemic stroke will be enrolled at Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS (ICH) Stroke Unit will be included and randomized in the following groups:

  • VR-AOT: experimental group, observing actions in virtual reality
  • VR-LO: control groups, observing a matched dose of videos depicting landscapes in virtual reality.

Clinical, neuroimaging and biohumoral evaluations, performed at Screening (Ts), Basal visit (T0), end-of-treatment (T1), 2 months follow up (FU-2), will include the following endpoints: Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor scale (FM-UE); Nine-hole-peg test; Box and block test; Modified Ashworth scale; MRC; Pain Numeric-rating-scale; Functional Independence measure.

Patients will undergo treatment sessions for 6 weeks (5 days/week). VR-AOT patients will observe in virtual reality -rehearse and execute specific upper limb motor task belonging to activities of daily living. VR-LO participants will observe virtually explorable landscapes lasting for a matched duration. Then, participants will be asked to actively perform the same set of hand actions requested to VR-AOT experimental groups.

An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be performed, using rmANOVA, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in clinical outcomes, and chi-square test. For the primary endpoints, a two-arms rmANOVA with time as within-subject factor (3 levels: T0, T1, FU2) and group (VR-AOT vs VR-LO) as between-subjects factor will be conducted. The same approach will be adopted for secondary outcome measures. Subsequently, the effect of clinical, neuroradiological and biohumoral baseline features will be tested as regressors on the primary outcome variations via linear or ranked regression models. Significance will be set at 5%, and adjusted for MC.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18
  • Ischemic stroke in the territory of middle cerebral artery (MCA, lesion extension lower than half of its territory) or lacunar stroke
  • MRC score 2-4 in at least one segment of the affected limb
  • Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) prior to stroke ≤ 2
  • Able to perform study requirements
  • Able to give informed consent according to ICH/ GCP, and national/local regulations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of global aphasia
  • History of seizures
  • Posterior circulation stroke
  • Significant ipovisus
  • Moderate-to severe neglect
  • Cognitive impairment or language barriers
  • Psychiatric comorbidities
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Contraindication to perform MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VR-AOT
Experimental group, observing actions in virtual reality
VR-AOT patients will observe, rehearse and execute specific upper limb motor task belonging to activities of daily living.
Other: VR-LO
Control group, observing a matched dose of videos depicting landscapes in virtual reality
VR-LO participants will observe virtually explorable landscapes lasting for a matched duration. Then, they will be asked to actively perform the same set of hand actions requested to VR-AOT experimental groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor scale at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks from baseline
Stroke-specific, performance-based, impairment index (range 0-66, higher values indicate a better performance)
Six weeks from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Nine-hole-peg test at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks from baseline
Standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function
Six weeks from baseline
Change from baseline Nine-hole-peg test at 2 months
Time Frame: Two months from baseline
Standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function
Two months from baseline
Change from baseline Box and block test at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks from baseline
Unilateral gross manual dexterity measure
Six weeks from baseline
Change from baseline Box and block test at 2 months
Time Frame: Two months from baseline
Unilateral gross manual dexterity measure
Two months from baseline
Change from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks from baseline
Spasticity measure, evaluating limb's tone responsiveness to passive mobilization (Range: 0-4, higher values indicates higher degree of spasticity)
Six weeks from baseline
Change from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 2 months
Time Frame: Two months from baseline
Spasticity measure, evaluating limb's tone responsiveness to passive mobilization (Range: 0-4, higher values indicates higher degree of spasticity)
Two months from baseline
Change from baseline Functional Independence Measure at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Six weeks from baseline
Questionnaire measuring the independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). (Range: 18-126, higher values indicate an higher degree of functional independence)
Six weeks from baseline
Change from baseline Functional Independence Measure at 2 months
Time Frame: Two months from baseline
Questionnaire measuring the independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). (Range: 18-126, higher values indicate an higher degree of functional independence)
Two months from baseline
Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor scale at 2 months
Time Frame: Two months from baseline
Stroke-specific, performance-based, impairment index (range 0-66, higher values indicate a better performance)
Two months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Action Observation and following Action Execution

Subscribe