This is the Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Hydrochloric Acid-pumice Compound and Sodium Hypochlorite-pumice Compound Used in Microabrasion Technique for the Treatment of Dental Fluorosis. Change in Tooth Shade Was Checked Before and After the Procedure.

April 26, 2022 updated by: HAREEM ABDUL SATTAR, Fatima Jinnah Dental College

Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Hypochlorite Used in Microabrasion Technique for the Treatment of Dental Fluorosis.

To compare the clinical effectiveness of hydrochloric acid-pumice compound and sodium hypochlorite-pumice compound in treating dental fluorosis using microabrasion technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A Randomized Clinical Trial was taken Fatima Jinnah Dental College Hospital, Karachi, from 1st November 2019 To 30th April 2020. Total 30 teeth in each group were included. Preoperatively shade was checked. The mixture was applied 10 times or more during the same session. Total treatment time was around 30 minutes. Every patient received entire microabrasion treatment. At the end of the treatment, neutral sodium fluoride gel was applied. Then changes in shade were checked. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75400
        • Fatima Jinnah Dental College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-40 years .
  • Permanent dentition assessed on clinical examination.
  • Have at least four maxillary incisors with scores of 4 to 5, according to the Dean's Fluorosis Index.
  • Have no caries or restoration on the teeth to be treated assessed clinically.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor oral dental and general health assessed on clinical examination.
  • History of Smoking and any form of tobacco.
  • Patients with periodontal disease assessed on clinical examination.
  • Caries on anterior teeth assessed on clinical examination.
  • Hypersensitive teeth assessed on clinical examination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: GROUP A (HYDROCHLORIC ACID)
Total 30 teeth in each group were included. Preoperatively shade was checked with VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide. The mixture (hydrochloric acid pumice compound) was applied 10 times or more during the same session. Total treatment time was around 30 minutes. Every patient received entire microabrasion treatment. At the end of the treatment, neutral sodium fluoride gel was applied. Then change in shade was checked again with VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide.
It is a non-restorative, conservative treatment that works both chemically and mechanically to remove up to 0.2 mm of affected enamel per application. Pumice either mixed with 18% hydrochloric acid or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was used to remove fluorosis stains.
EXPERIMENTAL: GROUP B ( SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE)

Total 30 teeth in each group were included. Preoperatively shade was checked with VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide.The mixture (sodium hypochlorite pumice compound) was applied 10 times or more during the same session. Total treatment time was around 30 minutes. Every patient received entire microabrasion treatment. At the end of the treatment, neutral sodium fluoride gel was applied. Then change in shade was checked again with VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide.

.

It is a non-restorative, conservative treatment that works both chemically and mechanically to remove up to 0.2 mm of affected enamel per application. Pumice either mixed with 18% hydrochloric acid or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was used to remove fluorosis stains.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HYDROCHLORIC ACID PUMICE COMPOUND
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Tooth shade was recorded at the baseline with the help of VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide. The arrangement of the shades in the VITA classical family of shades is as follows: A1 - A4 (reddish-brownish), B1 - B4 (reddish-yellowish), C1 - C4 (greyish shades), D2 - D4 (reddish-grey).Determination of shade was done under daylight. Closest shade was selected from the shade tab. Effectiveness was marked positive if there was atleast one change in shade from the baseline just after the procedure to shade group from A1-D4. Effectiveness was marked negative if there is no change in shade from the baseline.
30 minutes
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE PUMICE COMPOUND
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Tooth shade was recorded at the baseline with the help of VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide. The arrangement of the shades in the VITA classical family of shades is as follows: A1 - A4 (reddish-brownish), B1 - B4 (reddish-yellowish), C1 - C4 (greyish shades), D2 - D4 (reddish-grey).Determination of shade was done under daylight. Closest shade was selected from the shade tab. Effectiveness was marked positive if there was atleast one change in shade from the baseline just after the procedure to shade group from A1-D4. Effectiveness was marked negative if there is no change in shade from the baseline.
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: HAREEM A SATTAR, FCPS, Fatima Jinnah Dental College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

i will share the IPD once it will get published

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Fluoroses

Clinical Trials on enamel microabrasion

Subscribe