Success Rates for Management of Separated Instruments

April 22, 2022 updated by: Mohamed Mokhtar Nagy, Ain Shams University

Success Rates for Management of Separated Instruments in Canals With Type II Vertucci's Classification: Prospective Clinical Study

The study compares the prognosis of cases of Separated Instruments in Canals With Type II Vertucci's Classification treated with conservative approach

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Teeth with Type II Vertucci root canal configuration are having more incidence of instruments separation due the presence of an S-type (Double curve). The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of minimally invasive approach (MIA), retaining the separated in one root canal, cleaning and shaping of portals of entry of the two canals and portal of exit of both canals through the other patent canal, in comparison to the outcome of retrieval of the broken instrument by ultrasonics retrieval techniques (URT)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Ainshams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

33 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of separated instrument in a root with a Vertucci's type II configuration (the level of the SI was evaluated using CBCT scans)
  • Age range 35-55 years
  • Teeth having a baseline periapical lesion (PAI score ≥2) in the affected root

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients who refused to undergo radiographic follow-up.

    • Pregnant females.
    • Patients suffered from a systemic disease.
    • Teeth with lesions connected to adjacent teeth.
    • Teeth with root fractures or perforations.
    • Teeth with lesion communicating with the alveolar crest.
    • patients with generalized chronic periodontitis or teeth that need periodontal surgery prior to coronal restorations due to marginal deficiency
    • teeth with damaged or resorbed peri- apex
    • teeth that were treated with a fiber post and teeth with canal curvature more than 25 degrees

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: conservative treatment
The patent canal is retreated, no attempt to deal with the separated instrument
retreatment of the patent root canal only without attempt to retrieve the separated instrument
Active Comparator: traditional
All canals are retreated with attempts to retrieve the broken file
retreatment of the patent root canal only without attempt to retrieve the separated instrument

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
monitoring of periapical index
Time Frame: 2 years
The peri-radicular condition was evaluated using the Periapical Index (PAI) created by Ørstavik et al. (1986). The PAI includes five grades represented on an ordinal scale as follows: (1) normal periapical structures; (2) small changes in the periapical bone or bone structure; (3) changes in the periapical bone structure with mineral loss, characteristic of apical periodontitis; (4) demineralization of the periapical bone within a well-defined radiolucent area; and (5) demineralization of the periapical bone with exacerbations and expansion in bone structure.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FDASU-Rec IR012249

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Teeth, Endodontically-Treated

Clinical Trials on Endodontic retreatment

3
Subscribe