Comparison of Effect of Muscle Energy Technique vs PNF in Individuals With Hamstring Shortness

May 11, 2022 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
Comparison between the Effect of Muscle Energy Technique in Individuals with Hamstring Shortness and PNF in Individuals With Hamstring Shortness

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lahore, Pakistan
        • Chaudary Muhammad Akram Teaching Hospital, Azra Naheed Medical College, Superior University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with age group between 20 to 60 years with sedentary lifestyle will be included.
  • both males and females will be included.
  • Patients with diagnosed Tight hamstrings having knee extension less than 160º with the hip at 90º flexion.
  • Patients with decreased ROM at the knee joint.
  • Patients with reduced straight leg raise.
  • Patients with pain in posterior compartment of thigh.
  • Asymptomatic patients will be included.
  • Patients with restricted mobility of lower limb due to Hamstring shortness.
  • Symptomatic patients with hamstring tightness like of low back pain, pelvic tightness, knee osteoarthritis (grade 1 and 2) are included in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prolapsed disc will excluded.(14)
  • Patients with lower extremity injuries (strain, sprain, ligament injuries, etc.) in last 6 months will be excluded.
  • Patients with severe hamstring injury either acute or chronic will be excluded.
  • Patients with visual acute swelling in the region of hamstring muscle
  • Patients with fracture of any type and area.
  • Patients with dislocations or subluxations present will be excluded.
  • Patient recommended for TKR of knee joint.
  • Patients with any neurological disease like lumbar/cervical herniation, polyneuropathy, scoliosis etc.)
  • Patient with any tumor of hip or knee with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injuries will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Muscle Energy Technique
Using Muscle Energy Technique in Individuals With Hamstring Shortness
Using Muscle Energy Technique in Individuals With Hamstring Shortness
EXPERIMENTAL: Proprioception neuromuscular facilitation (PNF)
Using proprioception neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) in Individuals With Hamstring Shortness
Using proprioception neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) in Individuals With Hamstring Shortness

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individuals With Hamstring Shortness
Time Frame: 6 Months

Research will be effective to compare effectiveness of muscle energy technique MET and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) to the further develop conclusion that which treatment method is more effective and quicker for the treatment of pain, improving flexibility and functional ability of patients with hamstring shortness having sedentary life style.

Most of the target population having hamstring shortness due to sedentary lifestyle mostly poor posture and ergonomics that may eventually leads to loss of flexibility, functional ability and increases pain. The two procedures were applied at a very same time with equal gatherings and similar standards. Met and PNF are most effective stretching techniques to be compared

6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DPT/Batch-Fall17/505

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hamstring Shortness

Clinical Trials on Muscle Energy Technique

3
Subscribe