Cognitive Exergame Training on Dual-Task Cost and Balance Stability in Older Adults

May 24, 2022 updated by: Ahmet Begde, Loughborough University

The Effect of Cognitive Exergame Training on Dual-Task Cost and Balance Stability of the Individuals Between 65 and 85 Years

Balance stability requires both motor and cognitive (mental) functions working together. Balance stability may decrease when performing two tasks at the same time (dual task), as cognitive and motor tasks compete for performing a higher task. Meanwhile, social distance and remote working become a necessity due to Covid-19. The primary aim is to evaluate the feasibility of cognitive exergame training in reducing dual-task costs and improve the balance performance among individuals between 65 and 85 years. The secondary aim is to observe the effectiveness of virtual home exercise on adherence and interactive rate of the population between 65 and 85 years.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Leicestershire
      • Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, LE11 3TU
        • Recruiting
        • Loughborough University
        • Contact:
          • Ahmet Begde

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals between 65-85 years
  • Individuals with no sign of aphasia
  • Individuals with a manual muscle test score of ≤5/5
  • Individuals who can perform a full range of movement (ROM) against gravity
  • Individuals who can stand for five minutes without the use of an assistive device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with a neurological condition (e.g. vestibular deficit, stroke, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy or peripheral neuropathy) o Individuals with a cardiovascular or musculoskeletal disorder
  • Individuals with any lower limb injury or balance disorder within the last 12 months that has affected their physical activity
  • Individuals with cognitive impairment such as dementia
  • Individuals who score over 13 points on the Short FES-I

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive dual task training (CDT) Group
The CDT group (n = 20) will participate in games on Xbox one consoles that require a higher cognitive demand compared to those of the BDT group. The training sessions will include five different games that require participants to stand and use their hand reach function to interact with different cognitive (i.e. dual-tasking) skills, such as working memory, problem solving, Stroop effect, planning, attention and response time.
Each training programme (Xbox or Wii Fit) is aimed at improving the following issues: improper weight shifting and reduced dual tasking. The participants will be guided in the first sessions to familiarize themselves with the exercises. Then, they will be allowed to exercise independently at home. Allowing enough practice time before collecting data helps minimize practice effects. practice effects are confounding factors that can affect the results and make it difficult to identify whether the improvement in outcome is due to the training or not. The duration of the training programme will be approximately 30 minutes. Each game will be played three times (the duration for each game is approximately one minute).
Active Comparator: Balance dual task (BDT) training Group
The BDT group (n = 20) will participate in the conventional training programme on Wii consoles that have been used by previous studies (Barcala et al. 2013; Chao et al. 2015; Kannan et al. 2019), to improve balance performance. The training sessions will include five different games that require participants to stand and use their weight shift to control the game while maintaining balance.
Each training programme (Xbox or Wii Fit) is aimed at improving the following issues: improper weight shifting and reduced dual tasking. The participants will be guided in the first sessions to familiarize themselves with the exercises. Then, they will be allowed to exercise independently at home. Allowing enough practice time before collecting data helps minimize practice effects. practice effects are confounding factors that can affect the results and make it difficult to identify whether the improvement in outcome is due to the training or not. The duration of the training programme will be approximately 30 minutes. Each game will be played three times (the duration for each game is approximately one minute).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Dual-task cost
Time Frame: 8 weeks

A dual-task cost (DTC) occurs when attention is divided between two tasks (e.g. cognitive and motor tasks), or a delay in one task causes attention to divert to the other. This may cause a decline in balance stability and an increase in dual-task cost. Calculation of dual-task cost A decrease in dual-task performance (i.e. dual-task cost) is represented with a negative value, whereas an improvement in dual-task performance is represented by a positive value.

DTE(%)=((dual task - single task))/(single task )× 100% An example of the formula for measuring dual-task interference using absolute values of LOS parameters is DTE(%)=((dual-task LOS (RT) - single task LOS (RT)))/(single task LOS (RT)) × 100% An increase in response latency indicates a reduction in performance, thus the following will be used instead: DTE(%)=(-(dual task - single task))/(single task )× 100%

8 weeks
Change in Static balance task
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The static balance is the ability to keep standing steady with eyes open and with eyes closed without losing balance or taking a step (Winter 1995). The following centre of pressure COP parameters will be computed separately for the anteroposterior (AP) and Mediolateral (ML) directions, such The COP mean velocity (MV), stander deviation (SD) and total displacement area (TD) parameters.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Limit of stability task
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Limit of stability (LOS) is the amount of the maximum excursion of COP that can be achieved within the supported base without losing balance or taking a step. The dependent variable for LOS is COP parameters that will be collected separately for the (AP) and (ML) directions, such as the COP mean velocity, COP path and COP range (Juras et al. 2008).
8 weeks
Change in Arithmetic tasks
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Arithmetic cognitive tasks will be measured using the parameters of response latency and response accuracy. Response latency is defined as 'the time from stimulus onset to response onset', and response accuracy is defined as 'the number of correct responses divided by the total number of responses, expressed as a percentage. The cognitive task will only record at 80% of the correct responses or higher. This technique can help to identify if the cognitive task provides an adequate challenge for participants and minimize any learning effect.
8 weeks
Change in Functional Reach (FR) Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
FR will measure the maximal distance that can be reached forward beyond the arm's length, without moving the feet. A yardstick will be used to measure the forward reaching length in (cm).
8 weeks
Change in Visual sensitivity test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The computerized visual search and detection test requires the disengagement from one focal area of attention to locate the next target (a triangle formed from constantly moving dots). The participant is instructed to press a key as soon as they could detect a triangle on the screen. The baseline level contained 15 stimuli, which are drawn in solid green lines on a black background. In the 40 complex-level stimuli, moving random dots covering the entire screen serve as background distractors. New target triangles are initially drawn with just a few visible dots of each line, and the density of these points increased linearly with time until a keypress response is registered. The screen is redrawn every 250 ms. After each response, new targets appear with random delays of at least 500 ms. Visual search results are recorded with reaction time (in ms) and the number of true and false positives.
8 weeks
Change in Corsi Block-Tapping Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The test is one of the most commonly used tests to measure the visuospatial short-term and working memory. This computerised test consists of nine cubical blocks positioned on the screen. The blocks are tapped in a specific sequence (the colour of tapped blocks change). The participant is asked to remember and tap these blocks in the same sequence. The sequences are easy at the beginning, usually involving three blocks, but they become more difficult in the later stages. The results are recorded with reaction time (in ms) and the number of true and false positives. The test takes around 5 mins.
8 weeks
Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Each form of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) consists of a 12-item word list of four words from each of the three meaning categories. The participant is instructed to listen carefully as the assessor reads the word list and tries to memorize the words. The word list is then read to the subject at a rate of about one word every 2 seconds. The patient's free recall of the list is recorded. The same procedure is done for two more attempts. After the third learning attempt, the patient is read 24 words and asked to say "yes" after each word (12 goals) that appears on the recall list, and "no" after each word (12 distractors) that does not appear. Half of the distractors are taken from the same semantic categories as the targets (relevant distractors) and a half from other categories (unrelated distractors).
8 weeks
Change in Mobility (Fall Risk)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Timed up and go test (<3 min) The participant is asked to rise from a standard armchair, walk to a marker 3 m away, turn, walk back, and sit down again. The time is recorded.
8 weeks
Change in Stroop Colour-Word test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The test measures the sensitivity to interference and the ability to suppress an automated response (time needed to read the colour words rather than the time it takes to name the colour of the letters). The baseline level contains 15 stimuli (reading colour names printed in white on a black background), the colour-interference level (naming the font colour rather than reading the printed colour name, which is always incongruent) comprise 40 stimuli.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ahmet Begde, Loughborough University
  • Principal Investigator: Alaa Algurafi, Loughborough University
  • Study Director: Matthew Pain, Loughborough University
  • Study Director: Glen Blenkinsop, Loughborough University
  • Study Director: Eef Hogervorst, Loughborough University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5832

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Older People

Clinical Trials on Exergame home training programme

3
Subscribe