Randomized Control Trial, Cryoablation as an Adjunct to Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

March 12, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Single Center, Randomized Control Trial of Cryoablation During Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

To determine if patients with intraoperative cryoablation have better analgesia results compared to the control group of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSRF) without cryoablation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Locoregional pain control with cryoneurolysis of intercostal nerves has been employed as an adjunct for longer term pain control. Initially introduced in thoracic surgery, intercostal nerve cryoablation has demonstrated adequate pain control and substantial decrease in opioid consumption and hospital length of stay.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Recruiting
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is admitted to the trauma service.
  • The patient has multiple displaced rib fractures (≥2 ribs), offered fixation, and consents to SSRF
  • The patient is not being treated for chronic pain
  • The patient is >18 years of age.
  • Surgery anticipated <120 hours from injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years or ≥ 80 years
  • Flail chest: either radiographic or clinical. Radiographic flail chest is defined on CT chest as ≥ 2 ribs each fractured in ≥ 2 places. Clinical flail is defined as visualization of a segment of chest wall with paradoxical motion on physical exam.
  • Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (Intra-cranial hemorrhage visualized on CT head with GCS at the time of consideration for enrollment < 12)
  • Prior or expected emergency exploratory laparotomy during this admission
  • Prior or expected emergency thoracotomy during this admission
  • Prior or expected emergency craniotomy during this admission
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Pelvic fracture that has required, or is expected to require, operative intervention during this admission
  • The patient was unable to accomplish activities of daily living independently prior to injury (e.g., dressing, bathing, preparing meals)
  • The patient is incarcerated
  • The patient is known to be pregnant
  • Unable to perform Video Assisted Thoracoscopy (VATS) at time of SSRF due to lung isolation or previous pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures plus Multimodal Pain Therapy plus CRYOABLATION
Adding Cryoablation of levels 3-8, in addition to patients that undergo SSRF for multiple rib fractures.
Using Atricure device, cryoice, intercostal nerves 3-8 will be ablated in the experimental arm. This is in addition to mechanical fixation of rib fractures and multimodal systemic therapy.
Active Comparator: Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures plus Multimodal Pain Therapy
Standard surgical treatment of patients with multiple rib fractures plus Multimodal Pain Therapy
Standard surgical treatment of patients with multiple rib fractures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine Milligram Equivalents Use following Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline
To determine if patients with intraoperative cryoablation have better analgesia results compared to the control group of SSRF without cryoablation.
Baseline
Morphine Milligram Equivalents Use following Intervention
Time Frame: Day 1
To determine if patients with intraoperative cryoablation have better analgesia results compared to the control group of SSRF without cryoablation.
Day 1
Morphine Milligram Equivalents Use following Intervention
Time Frame: Day 30
To determine if patients with intraoperative cryoablation have better analgesia results compared to the control group of SSRF without cryoablation.
Day 30
Morphine Milligram Equivalents Use following Intervention
Time Frame: Day 90
To determine if patients with intraoperative cryoablation have better analgesia results compared to the control group of SSRF without cryoablation.
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days in Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Days during admission
Hospital Length of Stay
Days during admission
Number of days in ICU Stay
Time Frame: Day 90
ICU Length of Stay
Day 90
Amount of Chest tube drainage
Time Frame: Day 90
Chest tube drainage
Day 90
Quality of Life Scores
Time Frame: Month 1 and Month 3
Quality of Life questionnaire - Quality of life questionnaire consists of a set of survey questions that can be used to collect data related to an individual in particular and society in general on various parameters that determine their general quality of life
Month 1 and Month 3
Number of Mortalities in hospital
Time Frame: Day 90
Mortality, in hospital
Day 90
Number of Readmissions
Time Frame: 30 day readmission rate
Readmission
30 day readmission rate
Number of Additional Thoracic Procedures
Time Frame: Day 7
Additional Thoracic Procedures
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bradely W. Thomas, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Cryoablation of Intercostal Nerves

Subscribe