Lignocaine Only Versus Lignocaine Plus Magnesium Sulphate for Pain Relief After Episiotomy.

June 9, 2022 updated by: Dr. Hamna Atta, Rawalpindi Medical College

Comparison of Effect of Lignocaine Only Versus Lignocaine Plus Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvant Perineal Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Episiotomy.

Trauma to perineal area is one of common problems faced by obstetricians affecting physical, social and mental wellbeing of patients. During labor, surgical incision to perineum (episiotomy) is done to facilitate delivery of fetus. Episiotomy is associated with complication such as hemorrhage, infection, pain and wound breakdown. Pain relief after episiotomy is primary concern of obstetrician and right of patient. Pain after delivery causes delayed mobility of patient, late initiation of breast feeding and may affect mother psychologically. Magnesium sulphate is readily available in obstetric units due to its diverse uses, wide safety margins and cost-effectiveness. Magnesium is a calcium channel blocker and noncompetitive N methyl D aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with anti-nociceptive effects. Blocking of NMDA receptors inhibits central sensitization due to peripheral nociceptive stimulation. The role of magnesium has been evaluated as adjuvant for intra- and post-operative pain relief in orthopedic, gynecological, and thoracic surgeries and has established role in anesthesia and obstetrics. Lignocaine given locally does not provide adequate pain relief. There is need to find adjuvants to local anesthesia for pain relief after episiotomy. There is paucity of published data on the use of Magnesium sulphate as an adjunct to local anesthetics for episiotomy or its repair. No local study has been done in this regard.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Trauma to perineal area is one of common problems faced by obstetricians affecting physical, social and mental wellbeing of patients. (Perumal D. et al. 2017) During labor, surgical incision to perineum (episiotomy) is done to facilitate delivery of fetus. (Arulkumaran S. et al 2012) Episiotomy is associated with complication such as hemorrhage, infection, pain and wound breakdown. (Sule ST et al. 2003) Pain relief after episiotomy is primary concern of obstetrician and right of patient. (Brennan F. et al. 2007) Pain after delivery causes delayed mobility of patient, late initiation of breast feeding and may affect mother psychologically.

Suturing of episiotomy is done adhering to basic surgical principles of providing good pain control. (Sultan AH et al. 2014) Traditionally local analgesia using xylocaine is being used during episiotomy and repair. Despite this patients do complain of pain in postpartum period which seems less adequate for patients. One study compared infiltration of bupivacaine and lignocaine for episiotomy and found out that patients with lignocaine had higher pain score at 2, 4, and 6 h after the repair. (Abu-Zaida A. et al. 2021) One meta-analysis also determined that pain was lower with bupivacaine compared to lignocaine after episiotomy. (Fyneface Ogan S et al. 2006) Therefore it is necessary to determine other complementary methods to provide adequate pain relief after episiotomy.

Magnesium sulphate is readily available in obstetric units due to its diverse uses, wide safety margins and cost-effectiveness. Magnesium is a calcium channel blocker and noncompetitive N methyl D aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with anti-nociceptive effects. Blocking of NMDA receptors inhibits central sensitization due to peripheral nociceptive stimulation. (Akhtar MI et al. 2011) Furthermore, there are peripheral NMDA receptors in the muscles, skin, and knee joints that play a role in sensory transmission of noxious signals. The nociceptors release glutamate in response to an afferent signal that binds to NMDA receptors leading to nerve depolarization and heightened sensitivity to circulating neurotransmitters. Magnesium sulphate inhibits these receptors thus producing anti-nociceptive effect. The addition of Magnesium sulphate to local anesthetics for neuraxial anesthesia prolongs the duration of anesthesia and improves the quality of analgesia. (Abd Elsalam KA et al. 2017)

The role of magnesium has been evaluated as adjuvant for intra- and post-operative pain relief in orthopedic, gynecological, and thoracic surgeries and has established role in anesthesia and obstetrics. (Akhtar MI et al. 2011) Moreover studies have determined that subcutaneous infiltration of Magnesium sulphate with local anesthetic after caesarean section prolongs the analgesic efficacy of local anesthetic without any significant adverse effects. (Kundra S et al. 2016) One recent study comparing the effects of using local infiltration of lignocaine only and lignocaine with magnesium after episiotomy sulfate determined that patients have significant pain relief after 2 hours with combination of lignocaine and magnesium sulfate. (Garba JA et al. 2021)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

62

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant ladies undergoing vaginal birth and willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not willing to participate in study.
  • Patients with perineal hematoma, tear or other complications developed after episiotomy
  • Patients requiring additional analgesia during treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Group B
Patients will be given local infiltration with 9 ml (180 mg) of 2% lignocaine only.
Active Comparator: Group A
Patients will be given local infiltration with 9 ml (180 mg) of 2% lignocaine + 1 ml (500 mg) of 50% Magnesium sulphate
. One group (Group A) will be given local infiltration with 9 ml (180 mg) of 2% lignocaine + 1 ml (500 mg) of 50% Magnesium sulphate. Other group (Group B) will be given local infiltration with 9 ml (180 mg) of 2% lignocaine.
Other Names:
  • Magnesium sulphate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: At episiotomy
Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain assessment with score of 0 as "no pain" to 10 as "worst imaginable pain" will be used to assess pain.
At episiotomy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: 2 hours after episiotomy
Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain assessment with score of 0 as "no pain" to 10 as "worst imaginable pain" will be used to assess pain.
2 hours after episiotomy
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: 6 hours after episiotomy
Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain assessment with score of 0 as "no pain" to 10 as "worst imaginable pain" will be used to assess pain.
6 hours after episiotomy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hamna Atta, MBBS, Rawalpindi Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Procedural

Clinical Trials on Magnesium sulfate

Subscribe