Thyroid Associated Orbitopathy Treatment by Methotrexate Against Triamcinolone Periocular Injections (TOMATO)

September 17, 2022 updated by: Islam Youssef Swaify, Cairo University

Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Periocular Methotrexate Versus Periocular Triamcinolone Injections in Management of Thyroid Associated Orbitopathy

The study objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of periocular injections of methotrexate in management of patients with active moderate to severe thyroid associated orbitopathy in comparison to periocular injections of triamcinolone acetonide.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recruited subjects will be randomized such that one orbit receives 3 periocular injections of methotrexate and the contralateral orbit receives 3 periocular injections of triamcinolone acetonide at day 0, week 3 and week 6. All study subjects will be followed up for 6 months where outcome measures are assessed at 2 weeks, 1month, 3 months and 6 months after last injection

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Cairo university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Bilateral moderate to severe thyroid associated orbitopathy.
  2. Clinical Activity score (CAS) ≥ 3.
  3. Duration of thyroid associated orbitopathy < 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Sight threatening thyroid associated orbitopathy (dysthyroid optic neuropathy or exposure keratopathy) in any eye.
  2. Glaucoma patients or those known to be steroid responders
  3. Presence of orbital infections or any infection in nearby structures as paranasal sinusitis or dental abscess
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Previous orbital or lid surgeries
  6. History of steroid therapy (oral, intravenous or periocular) or other immunosuppressive therapy within the previous 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Methotrexate
Periocular injections of methotrexate
Three periocular injections of methotrexate at week 0, week 3 and week 6.
Active Comparator: Triamcinolone acetonide
Periocular injections of triamcinolone acetonide
Three periocular injections of triamcinolone acetonide at week 0, week 3 and week 6.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in clinical activity score (CAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Mean change in clinical activity score from baseline. CAS is a 10-point score (0-10) with disease considered active if CAS is >3.
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in proptosis
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Mean change in proptosis measured in millimeters by an exopthalmometer compared to baseline proptosis
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Change in lid aperture
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Mean change in lid aperture (distance between upper and lower lid margin measured in millimeters by a ruler
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Percentage of overall responders
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months

A participant is considered an overall responder if 2 or more of the following:

  1. Improvement of CAS ≥ 2 points.
  2. Improvement of proptosis ≥ 2 mm.
  3. Improvement of lid aperture ≥ 2 mm.
  4. Improvement of soft tissue signs ≥ 1 grade
  5. Improvement of EOM ductions
3 months and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Haytham E. Nasr, Cairo university
  • Study Director: Rania A. El Essawy, Cairo university
  • Study Director: Kareem B. Elessawy, Cairo university
  • Principal Investigator: Islam Y. Swaify, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Associated Orbitopathy

Clinical Trials on Methotrexate

Subscribe