MRI-guided Transurethral Urethral Ultrasound Ablation for the Treatment of Intermediate Grade Prostate Cancer

January 16, 2024 updated by: David A. Woodrum, Mayo Clinic

Focal Prostate Ablation for Intermediate Grade Cancer Utilizing TULSA Profound System

This clinical trial tests whether the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) procedure is safe and effective in treating patients with intermediate grade prostate cancer. MRI-guided TULSA ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses an ultrasound device guided by MRI imaging to deliver high-energy sound waves, producing very high temperature to ablate (destroy) tumor cells in a targeted manner. The MRI-guided TULSA procedure may help patients avoid surgery and help improve prostate cancer patients' quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To perform the TULSA procedure for safety and efficacy outcomes in men aged 45 to 80 years with biopsy-confirmed, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess patient-reported metrics for quality of life (QOL). II. To assess return to normal activity. III. Compare economic benefit as noted from Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo MRI-guided TULSA. Patients may also undergo digital rectal exam (DRE), cystoscopy, biopsy, bone scan, prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET), and/or multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) at screening.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David A. Woodrum, M.D., Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Age 45-80 years, with > 10 years life expectancy
  • Biopsy-confirmed, NCCN (favorable Gleason grade [GG2] and unfavorable GG3) intermediate-risk prostate cancer
  • Stage =< T2c, N0, M0
  • International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 2 or 3 disease on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS-guided) biopsy (minimum 8 cores, combination of systematic and MRI fusion-guided) or in-bore biopsy (minimum 3 cores from each Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] version [v]2 category >= 3 lesion). Biopsy reported within 12 months of baseline visit, with minimum 6-week interval between biopsy and baseline
  • Prostate specific antigen (PSA) =< 20 ng/mL reported within 3 months of baseline
  • Treatment naive
  • Planned ablation volume < 3.0 cm axial radius from the urethra on mpMRI acquired within 6 months of baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to undergo MRI or general anaesthesia
  • Suspected tumour > 30 mm from the prostatic urethra or < 14 mm from the prostatic urethra
  • Prostate calcifications > 3 mm in maximum extent obstructing ablation of tumor on low-dose pelvic computed tomography (CT)

    • Criteria subject to additional review and approval by sponsor. Alternatively, prospective TRUS to query calcifications or susceptibility-weighted MRI if available may be used to assess calcification. Imaging for calcification screening must be dated within 1 year of baseline visit
  • Unresolved urinary tract infection or prostatitis
  • History of proctitis, bladder stones, hematuria, history of acute urinary retention, severe neurogenic bladder
  • Artificial urinary sphincter, penile implant or intraprostatic implant
  • Less than 10 years life expectancy
  • Patients who are otherwise not deemed candidates for radical prostatectomy (RP)
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • History of anal or rectal fibrosis or stenosis, or urethral stenosis, or other abnormality challenging insertion of devices

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment (MRI-guided TULSA)
Patients undergo MRI-guided TULSA. Patients may also undergo DRE, cystoscopy, biopsy, bone scan, PSMA PET, and/or mpMRI at screening.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo biopsy
Other Names:
  • Bx
Undergo mpMRI
Other Names:
  • Multiparametric MRI
  • MP-MRI
  • mpMRI
  • Multi-parametric MRI
Undergo MRI-Guided TULSA
Other Names:
  • MRI-TULSA
Undergo cystoscopy
Other Names:
  • CS
Undergo bone scan
Other Names:
  • Bone Scintigraphy
Undergo PSMA PET
Other Names:
  • PSMA PET
  • Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET
  • PSMA-Positron emission tomography
Undergo DRE
Other Names:
  • DRE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients free from treatment failure
Time Frame: At 24 months post-treatment
Failure is defined as: delivery of any additional intervention for prostate cancer (local or systemic, including adjuvant therapy); or metastatic disease; or prostate cancer-specific death.
At 24 months post-treatment
Proportion of patients who maintain both urinary continence and erectile potency
Time Frame: At 12 months
Continence is defined as 'pad-free' (0 pads/day), and potency is defined as erection firmness sufficient for penetration (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]). Two-sided, 95% Pearson-Clopper confidence interval (CI) will be calculated for each intervention arm separately, and the difference in safety outcomes, along with exact 95% two-sided CI will be calculated.
At 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biochemical failure
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
In the absence of a validated threshold for biochemical failure in the setting of ablative therapies, the Phoenix criteria will be adopted for the transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) procedure (nadir + 2 ng/mL). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is measured at baseline/procedure, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months. It's measured using Scale Grade Group 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Up to 24 months
Histologic failure
Time Frame: At 12 months
The proportion of patients with clinically significant disease on targeted +/- systematic biopsy at 12 months. Clinically significant disease is defined as Gleason grade group 2 or higher. It is measured using scale Grade Group 1, 2, 3, and 4.
At 12 months
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v)2 score for each visible lesion
Time Frame: At 24 months post-treatment
These data will also be collected at 24 months post-initial treatment, for patients who receive repeat TULSA procedure. Findings from for-cause mpMRI will also be captured using Pi-Rads 1-5, 1 being most likely not cancer to 5 being very suspicious.
At 24 months post-treatment
Total prostate volume
Time Frame: At 24 months post-treatment
These data will also be collected at 24 months post-initial treatment, for patients who receive repeat TULSA procedure. Findings from for-cause mpMRI will also be captured.
At 24 months post-treatment
Salvage-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Up to 24 months
Biochemical failure-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Up to 24 months
Histologic failure-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Up to 24 months
Metastasis-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Up to 24 months
Prostate cancer-specific survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Up to 24 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Up to 24 months
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Change from baseline in the EPIC questions 1-7 domains and in the visual analog score will be measured at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months using Scale Grade Group 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Baseline up to 24 months
Change in patient-reported genitourinary function
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Change from baseline in the EPIC questions 8-21 will be measured using Scale Grade Group 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Baseline up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David A Woodrum, M.D., Ph.D., Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 7, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 22-001336 (Mayo Clinic in Rochester)
  • NCI-2022-03567 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe