- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05520580
Effect of Mother's Push at Cesarean Delivery Mother's PUSHING AT CS A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Effect of Mother's Active Pushing at Cesarean Delivery
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients, who are getting a scheduled cesarean section and having no contraindication for valsalva manoeuvres are eligible for this study. The gestational week should be between 37 and 42 weeks. Patients have to provide informed consent to this study. Patients must have epidural anaesthesia. They must understand the German language in order to understand information during cesarean section and correctly fill-out the questionnaires. Emergent cesarean sections or pregnant women known with chronic pain, severe preeclampsia or HELLP-Syndrome will be excluded.
179 patients were initially recruited, of which 79 were excluded. The 100 patients were grouped into two study groups; Conventional and Assisted Groups. The grouping was performed randomly using simple randomization. Based on the findings of Armbrust et al and our clinical experience we expect a therapeutic effect of 20% which results in a mean visual analog scale reduction of 1.2. Applying a two-sided T-Test for independent samples at a significance level of 0.05, a mean difference of 0.8 between the groups and a standard deviation of 2, we need 17 patients per treatment arm to detect a difference between both treatment groups with a power of 80%14. The number of patients per treatment arm was increased to 50 patients to make up for any missing data.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Lower Saxony
-
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany, 30625
- Hanover Medical School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Minimum age of 18 years
- Written consent
- Pregnant women between 37 - 42 weeks
- No fetal abnormalities.
- Scheduled primary C-Section (category 3&4 NICE guidelines) with epidural anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Emergent cesarean section
- Contraindication for epidural anaesthesia.
- Multiple pregnancies
- Scheduled C-section with placenta previa, accreta, increta or percreta. Secondary C-section
- Contraindication for Valsalva manoeuvre
- Known psychiatric illnesses
- Known chronic Pain, taking Pain killers regularly
- language barrier
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Conventional Group
Received a classic CS without intervention (Control group)
|
|
Experimental: Assisted group
after uterotomy during CS, the mother was instructed and motivated to push for the delivery of the head and the shoulders of the baby.
Simultaneously, the surgical assistant applied fundal pressure to support the mothers pushing if necessary.
|
after uterotomy, the mother was instructed and motivated to push for the delivery of the head and the shoulders of the baby.
Simultaneously, the surgical assistant applied fundal pressure to support the mothers pushing if necessary
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in postoperative pain of the mother
Time Frame: directly after delivery (intraoperative), 4-6 hours after delivery and on the first and second postoperative days
|
Discomfort and pain of the mother were assessed, on a 10-point Likert scale
|
directly after delivery (intraoperative), 4-6 hours after delivery and on the first and second postoperative days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incidence and quality of Breastfeeding
Time Frame: Postoperative day 0,1,2
|
Using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, Short Form (BSES-SF)
|
Postoperative day 0,1,2
|
Incidence of Postpartum Depression
Time Frame: Postoperative day 0,1,2
|
Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
|
Postoperative day 0,1,2
|
senses of participation and control
Time Frame: Intraoperative, directly after the baby delivery
|
Using likert scale.
To determine the effect of the mother's push on the sense of control and participation.
Studies showed that poor communications as well as fears of missing out on the birth are one of the main causes of distress during CS .
Improving sense of control and participation will improve the birth experience .
|
Intraoperative, directly after the baby delivery
|
Different in the operation duration between the two groups
Time Frame: At end of the operation
|
Using the time , that was documented in the operation protocols
|
At end of the operation
|
Intensity of intraoperative fundal pressure
Time Frame: Intraoperative after the delivery of the baby
|
Using the Likert scale
|
Intraoperative after the delivery of the baby
|
Quantity of the Intraoperative maternal blood loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative - end of the operation
|
Quantity of blood loss that the surgeon has been estimated
|
Intraoperative - end of the operation
|
Rate of birth asphyxia
Time Frame: Intraoperative , directly after the baby delivery
|
Using APGAR score , PH sampling from umbilical cord (venous and arterial)
|
Intraoperative , directly after the baby delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Peter Hillemanns, Professor, Hannover Medical School
- Principal Investigator: Stefan Engeli, Prof., Hannover Medical School (MHH)
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dennis CL. The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale: psychometric assessment of the short form. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):734-44. doi: 10.1177/0884217503258459.
- Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.
- Siddik SM, Aouad MT, Jalbout MI, Rizk LB, Kamar GH, Baraka AS. Diclofenac and/or propacetamol for postoperative pain management after cesarean delivery in patients receiving patient controlled analgesia morphine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):310-5. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.21828.
- Bergant AM, Nguyen T, Heim K, Ulmer H, Dapunt O. [German language version and validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1998 Jan 16;123(3):35-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023895. German.
- Wacker J. Geburtshilfe. Kaiserschnitt vs. Natürliche Geburt. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2010;70(10):840-3.
- Beckmann M W, Bader W BI. Finanzierung und finanzielle Probleme von Leistungen und Strukturen im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe im Jahr 2011 - allgemeine Aspekte und geburtshilfliche Versorgung. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2011.
- DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, Damush TM, Carney MF, Pearson M, Kahn KL. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 1996 Jul;15(4):303-14. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.4.303.
- Clement S. Psychological aspects of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;15(1):109-26. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0152.
- Smith J, Plaat F, Fisk NM. The natural caesarean: a woman-centred technique. BJOG. 2008 Jul;115(8):1037-42; discussion 1042. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01777.x.
- Armbrust R, Hinkson L, von Weizsacker K, Henrich W. The Charite cesarean birth: a family orientated approach of cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):163-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.991917. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
- Sitter-Trollmann P. " Stillen und Selbstwirksamkeit - ein Beitrag zur präventiven Erfassung von Stillproblemen durch standardisierte Instrumente ". 2011;147. Available from: http://othes.univie.ac.at/16715/
- Vaziri F, Arzhe A, Asadi N, Pourahmad S, Moshfeghy Z. Spontaneous Pushing in Lateral Position versus Valsalva Maneuver During Second Stage of Labor on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Aug 10;18(10):e29279. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.29279. eCollection 2016 Oct.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Rklapdor
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caesarean Section
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownCaesarean SectionEgypt
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalCompletedCaesarean SectionTaiwan
-
Sintetica SACross Research S.A.TerminatedUnplanned Caesarean SectionBelgium
-
Egyptian Society of Royal College of Obstetricians...UnknownCaesarean Section RateEgypt
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminatedCaesarean SectionUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentUnknownCaesarean SectionNetherlands
-
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalUnknownCaesarean SectionChina
-
Minia UniversityCompletedCaesarean Section Rate | EgyptEgypt
-
Trakya UniversityCompletedCaesarean Section | Anesthesia; Reaction
Clinical Trials on Mother's push during CS
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown