Dexametomedine Versus Ketamine as an Adjuvant in Erector Spinae Block for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control

April 17, 2024 updated by: Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Elhaddad, Kasr El Aini Hospital

Dexametomedine Versus Ketamine as an Adjuvant in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control in Pediatrics Cardiothoracic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A double-blind randomized control study to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as an adjuvant in combination with bupivacaine ultrasound-guided ESP block in patients scheduled for cardiothoracic surgeries with thoracotomy incision.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Following approval from research and ethics committee ,preoperative preparation, and induction of anesthesia Patients will be allocated to three groups according to the type of drug injected.

Group bupivacaine(Control) (B) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).

Group bupivacaine - ketamine (K) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% with ketamine 2 mg/kg, diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).

Group bupivacaine - Dexametomedine (D) received 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg. diluted with isotonic saline (total volume 15ml).

Unilateral Ultrasound-guided erector spinae block will be applied in both groups after the induction of anaesthesia. All patients will be tilted onto their left side (lateral position). while the ultrasound-guide unilateral erector spinae block will be performed under completely aseptic conditions. The anatomy will be examined by ultrasonography at 5-6Hz with a35 mm linear probe and a SonoSite M-turbo system (Fujifilm SonoSite, Inc., USA). a 22 g bevel needle will be advanced in a cephalad to caudad direction until the tip of the needle reach' the plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and immediately lateral to the transverse process. Once confirmed, after careful aspiration to demonstrate the absence of air or blood. An injection in this plane permitted the block to impact both the dorsal and ventral rami as they exited from the thoracic spine to innervate the chest wall. the block permits a diminished sensation spanning the T3-T10 dermatome levels. confirming the correct tissue plane by hydro-dissection.

Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation will be monitored continuously.

After completion of the surgery, inhalational anesthetics will be stopped as well the muscle relaxant. The patient will be then transferred to the ICU.

Postoperative assessment and analgesic regimen:

Post-operative pain intensity will be assessed using the objective pain score (OPS) by a person who will be blinded to the treatment. OPS score will be recorded at baseline,3,6,12,24 and 48 hours post-operatively to evaluate acute pain will be observed and recorded. for the score 4 or more, which was considered the end point of the study, and at this point. Patients will receiv paracetamol 15 gm / Kg IV /6 h, as components of multimodal analgesia regimen for postoperative pain control.

Persistent or breakthrough pain will be managed with incremental intravenous morphine at a dose of 0.1mg/kg to maintain resting (OPS) score ˂ 4.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Kasralainy Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age from 3 to 36 months
  • weight >5 kg.
  • gender both males and females
  • cardiothoracic surgeries with thoracotomy incision.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1 Skin erosions , hematomas or infection at or near the injection site.
  • 2. coagulopathy,
  • 3. History of hypersensitivity to bupivacaine ,ketamine or dexametomedine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: bupivacaine
Group bupivacaine(Control) (B) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).
Group bupivacaine(Control) (B) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Active Comparator: bupivacaine - ketamine
Group bupivacaine - ketamine (K) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% with ketamine 2 mg/kg, diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).
Group bupivacaine(Control) (B) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Group bupivacaine - ketamine (K) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% with ketamine 2 mg/kg, diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).
Other Names:
  • Ketalar
Active Comparator: bupivacaine - Dexametomedine
Group bupivacaine - Dexametomedine (D) received 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg. diluted with isotonic saline (total volume 15ml).
Group bupivacaine(Control) (B) received 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% diluted with isotonic saline (total volume15 ml).
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Group bupivacaine - Dexametomedine (D) received 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg. diluted with isotonic saline (total volume 15ml).
Other Names:
  • Precedex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the duration of analgesia
Time Frame: immediately at the end of pediatric cardiac operation
the duration of analgesia from block start time (time of LA injection) to block end time at which OPS score 4 or more) was recorded.
immediately at the end of pediatric cardiac operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe