A Study of Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of KAN-101 in Celiac Disease (ACeD-it)

A Phase 1B Open-label/Phase 2 Double-blind Placebo- Controlled Study for Pharmacodynamic (PD) Activity, Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety, and Tolerability of KAN-101 In Patients With Celiac Disease (CeD)

This study is to evaluate the Pharmacodynamic (PD), safety, tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK), and plasma biomarker response of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a 3-part, multicenter Phase 1b/2 study of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD) on a gluten free diet (GFD). The 3 parts include:

  • Part A - Open-label, multiple ascending dose
  • Part B - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design
  • Part C - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design

Part A is a Phase 1b, open-label, multiple ascending dose (MAD) study design to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of KAN-101 in adult participants (18 to 70 years inclusive) with histology-confirmed CeD. Up to 12 participants who meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will receive 1 of 2 dose levels of KAN-101. The overall study duration will be about 56 days, including up to 28 days of screening, 7 days of treatment and 21 days of follow up. There will be a gluten challenge test (GC) on Day 15.

Parts B and C are Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study to characterize the biomarker response following GC, safety, tolerability, and PK of KAN-101 in adult participants with histology-confirmed CeD. Approximately 16 participants (4 participants per dose group) will be enrolled in Part B and 104 participants (26 participants per dose group) enrolled into Part C. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1:1 and stratified by participation in a biopsy substudy to 4 treatment groups: placebo and 3 treatment groups with KAN-101 doses based on information obtained from Part A.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia, 2560
        • Campbelltown Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia, 4066
        • Wesley Research Institute
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Box Hill, Victoria, Australia, 3128
        • Box Hill Hospital
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
        • The Royal Melbourne Hospital
    • Western Australia
      • Midland, Western Australia, Australia, 6056
        • St John of God Midland Public and Private Hospitals
    • Auckland
      • Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
        • Optimal Clinical Trials
      • Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand, 0622
        • PCRN Trials
    • Bay of Plenty
      • Tauranga, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, 3110
        • P3 Research - Tauranga
    • Hamilton
      • Hamilton, Hamilton, New Zealand, 3204
        • Waikato Hospital
    • Otago
      • Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand, 9016
        • P3 Research - Dunedin
    • Wellington Region
      • Paraparaumu, Wellington Region, New Zealand, 5032
        • P3 Research - Palmerston North
      • Wellington, Wellington Region, New Zealand, 6021
        • P3 Research - Wellington
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
        • Anaheim Clinical Trials, LLC
    • Florida
      • St. Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33705
        • GCP Research
    • Georgia
      • Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States, 30328
        • Agile Clinical Research Trials
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
      • Normal, Illinois, United States, 61761
        • Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University Health University Hospital
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55114
        • Prism Research LLC dba Nucleus Network
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
        • Quality Clinical Research
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • North Carolina Clinical Research
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43213
        • Aventiv Research, Inc. d/b/a Centricity Research
      • Mentor, Ohio, United States, 44060
        • Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC
      • Westlake, Ohio, United States, 44145
        • NorthShore Gastroenterology Research, LLC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
      • Waco, Texas, United States, 76712
        • Digestive Research of Central Texas
    • Utah
      • Ogden, Utah, United States, 84405
        • Advanced Research Institute
      • West Jordan, Utah, United States, 84088
        • Velocity Clinical Research, Salt Lake City

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of celiac disease based on histology and positive celiac serology
  • HLA-DQ2.5 genotype
  • Gluten-free diet for at least 12 months
  • Negative or weak positive for transglutaminase IgA and negative or weak positive for DGP-IgA/IgG during screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refractory celiac disease
  • HLA-DQ8 genotype
  • Previous oral gluten challenge within 12 months
  • Selective IgA deficiency
  • Diagnosis of Type-1 diabetes
  • Active gastrointestinal diseases
  • History of dermatitis herpetiformis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1 in Part A
All eligible Part A participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 1
Dose 1 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Other Names:
  • KAN-101
Experimental: Cohort 2 in Part A
All eligible Part A participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 2
Dose 2 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Other Names:
  • KAN-101
Placebo Comparator: Group 1 in Part B and Part C
All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo
Placebo Intravenous (IV) infusion
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Experimental: Group 2 in Part B and Part C
All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 3
Dose 3 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Other Names:
  • KAN-101
Experimental: Group 3 in Part B and Part C
All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 4
Dose 4 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Other Names:
  • KAN-101
Experimental: Group 4 in Part B and Part C
All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 5
Dose 5 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Other Names:
  • KAN-101

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and Severity of TEAEs as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in Part A
Time Frame: From screening until the safety follow-up visit on Day 28
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
From screening until the safety follow-up visit on Day 28
Change in Pre- and Post-Gluten Challenge (GC) IL-2 Response From Baseline to Day 15
Time Frame: From Baseline screening to Day 15
CeD increases the circulating level of IL-2. Plasma samples were collected to assess the magnitude of biomarker response of IL-2 at the baseline screening visit pre-GC and again post-GC on Day 15 after 3 doses of KAN-101, the IL-2 response to GC is the difference of IL-2 between pre-GC and post-GC.
From Baseline screening to Day 15
Change in IL-2 Response From Day 15 Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GC
Time Frame: 0 (pre-GC) and 4 hours post-GC on Day 15
CeD increases the circulating level of IL-2. Plasma samples were collected to assess the magnitude of biomarker response of IL-2 at the baseline screening visit pre-GC and again post-GC on Day 15 after 3 doses of KAN-101, the IL-2 response to GC is the difference of IL-2 between pre-GC and post-GC.
0 (pre-GC) and 4 hours post-GC on Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: AUCinf
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: AUClast
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: Cmax
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: Tmax
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: t½
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: AUCinf
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: AUClast
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: Cmax
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: Tmax
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: t½
Time Frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
Incidence and Severity of TEAE as Assessed by the CTCAE in Part B
Time Frame: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
Incidence and Severity of TEAE as Assessed by the CTCAE in Part C
Time Frame: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Study Director, Anokion SA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 19, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Celiac Disease

Clinical Trials on Cohort 1 in Part A

Subscribe