Expert-Guided Early Tracheostomy Pathway

May 1, 2023 updated by: Ivor Douglas, Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Page 1/27 Effectiveness of an Expert-Guided Early Tracheostomy Pathway for Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults in Jordan

The optimal timing of tracheostomy insertion remains uncertain. We hypothesized that a clinical pathway including expert-informed risk assessment regarding predicted duration of mechanical (MV) would enhance the effectiveness of early percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) for patients with anticipated prolonged durations of MV, as reflected by duration of ventilation, complications, and patient-centered outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

three-year prospective observational study (2018-2020) at a tertiary care level 1 trauma center (King Hussein Medical Center) in Amman Jordan and 4 affiliated subspecialty hospitals. The study sequentially enrolled all adult patients (>18yo) with critical illness receiving MV in an intensive care unit for 48 hours or longer. Institutional ethical committee clearance for the study was secured.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amman, Jordan
        • King Hussein Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients undergoing continued MV for 48 or more hours for whom continuation of life-prolonging therapy was indicated

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients at imminent risk of death were included

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
PDT reccomended for patients with high risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Patients judged to be at moderate to high risk of prolonged ventilation(26, 27) were those who had chronic respiratory failure, advanced Effectiveness of an Expert-Guided Early Tracheostomy Pathway Page 6/27 age, thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy, persistent vasopressor shock, requirement for renal replacement therapy, an admission trauma diagnosis amongst other criteria, were included. In the absence of these criteria, a consensus for low risk of prolonged MV was reached. Early PDT, within the first 7 days from intubation, was recommended for patients with a moderate/high risk of prolonged MV (Early Group). Continued MV by ETT was recommend for low-risk patients with the potential for delayed PDT in the event of delayed weaning and liberation (Late Group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of hospitalization from admission to ventilator independent discharge
Time Frame: Hospital stay up to 90 days
Length of stay in days
Hospital stay up to 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Easy or Moderately Easy to Wean
Time Frame: Hospital stay up to 90 days
Numeric Score
Hospital stay up to 90 days
Days of ventilation requiring administration of NMB
Time Frame: Hospital stay up to 90 days
Fraction of days when patient are mechanically ventilated and received NMB
Hospital stay up to 90 days
Difference in average and total morphine equivalent dose
Time Frame: Hospital stay up to 90 days
Derived dose of morphine equivelants based on potency in mg
Hospital stay up to 90 days
90 day survival
Time Frame: 90 days
Survival recorded through 90 days from admission
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Trachtime22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Expert-Guided Early Tracheostomy

Subscribe