Comparing Cooling and/or Compression Approaches of Limbs for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (ICE COMPRESS)

June 17, 2024 updated by: SWOG Cancer Research Network

Ice Compress: Randomized Trial of Limb Cryocompression Versus Continuous Compression Versus Low Cyclic Compression for the Prevention of Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

This phase III trial compares the effect of 3 study approaches in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: 1) cryocompression, 2) continuous compression, and 3) low cyclic compression. Taxane chemotherapy drugs, such as paclitaxel or docetaxel, can cause a nerve disorder called peripheral neuropathy, which can cause numbness, tingling, or pain in the arms and legs. The 3 study approaches will use a device, called the Paxman Limb Cryocompression System, made of wraps that cool and/or compress the arms and legs. This study may help researchers determine if any of the study approaches are able to prevent taxane chemotherapy from causing peripheral neuropathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) at 12 weeks, in participants treated with taxane-based chemotherapy randomized to cryocompression therapy versus continuous compression therapy versus low cyclic compression therapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN.

II. To compare mean European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (EORTC-CIPN-20) sensory neuropathy subscale scores at 12 weeks by intervention study arm.

III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).

IV. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks in a sensitivity analysis with dropouts treated as failures.

V. To compare rates of adverse events related to study device at 12 weeks (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other adverse events [AEs] as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) between the three interventions.

ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN separately at weeks 6, 24, and 52.

II. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at week 12 with additional covariate adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI).

III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in mean EORTC CIPN-20 motor subscale score and autonomic subscale score, and in mean individual Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 domain (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores.

IV. To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in mean EORTC CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score, motor subscale score, and autonomic subscale score; and in mean PROMIS-29 individual domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores; and in changes in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).

V. To evaluate the differences by intervention study arm in proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks by chemotherapy regimen.

VI. To assess the effect of the intervention in reducing CIPN occurring in the upper extremities and, separately, in the lower extremities.

VII. To explore the relationship between duration of intervention received at the prescribed level and outcome, analogous to a dose-delivered analysis in a treatment trial.

VIII. To compare rates by study arm of CTCAE Grade 2 or higher sensory and motor neuropathy at 12 weeks.

IX. To evaluate tolerability of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, as assessed by rate of temperature and/or pressure adjustments, interruptions, and early discontinuation of the device.

X. To determine participant satisfaction of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, assessed by patient questionnaire.

XI. To compare taxane dose-reductions, treatment delays/discontinuation due to CIPN, and relative taxane dose intensity and total taxane dose received, between intervention study arms.

XII. To evaluate differences of intervention effect by sex, race, and ethnicity.

XIII. To confirm pretreatment biomarkers of CIPN risk (vitamin D) and on-treatment biomarker changes indicative of CIPN severity (Neurofilament light chain, NFL) as well as additional biomarkers of interest generated in S1714 for validation.

BANKING OBJECTIVE:

I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.

ARM 1: Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

ARM 2: Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

ARM 3: Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

777

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have a diagnosis of a solid tumor malignancy.
  • Participants must be planning to begin neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with one of the protocol-specified chemotherapy regimens below for a solid tumor malignancy within 3 calendar days after randomization.

    • Weekly paclitaxel x 12 consecutive weeks
    • Weekly paclitaxel x 12 consecutive weeks + carboplatin (weekly x 12 consecutive weeks or every 3 weeks x 4 consecutive cycles)
    • Paclitaxel + carboplatin every 3 weeks x 6 consecutive cycles without chemotherapy pause for surgery
    • Docetaxel + carboplatin every 3 weeks x 6 consecutive cycles without chemotherapy pause for surgery NOTE: For any of the protocol-specified chemotherapy regimens, concurrent targeted therapy with biologic therapy is allowed. Pembrolizumab (or other immune checkpoint inhibitors), trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab, or bevacizumab are allowed.
  • Participant must be >= 18 years old.
  • Participants must be offered the opportunity to participate in specimen banking. With participant consent, specimens must be collected and submitted via the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Specimen Tracking System.
  • Participants must be able to complete Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires in English or Spanish.
  • Participants must 1) agree to complete PROs at all scheduled assessments, and 2) complete the baseline PRO questionnaires within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Participants must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and must sign and give informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.

For participants with impaired decision-making capabilities, legally authorized representatives may sign and give informed consent on behalf of study participants in accordance with applicable federal, local, and Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must not have a history of skin or limb metastases.
  • Participants must not have previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy for any reason (e.g., taxanes, platinum agents, vinca alkaloids, or bortezomib).
  • Participants must not have pre-existing clinical peripheral neuropathy from any cause.
  • Participants must not have a history of Raynaud's phenomenon, cold agglutinin disease, cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, post-traumatic cold dystrophy, or peripheral arterial ischemia.
  • Participants must not have any open skin wounds or ulcers of the limbs at the time of randomization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1 (Cryocompression)
Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo collection of blood, plasma, and serum
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Undergo cryocompression
Experimental: Arm 2 (Continuous Compression)
Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo collection of blood, plasma, and serum
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Undergo continuous compression
Undergo low cyclic compression
Active Comparator: Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression)
Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo collection of blood, plasma, and serum
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Undergo continuous compression
Undergo low cyclic compression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (binary outcome: yes vs. no)
Time Frame: At the 12-week assessment after randomization
Defined as an absolute increase of 8 or more points over baseline in the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score. Analysis will be conducted multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
At the 12-week assessment after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean sensory neuropathy scores
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
Will assess by study arm. Will examine the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score as a continuous variable on the 0-100 scale. The differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuorpen, tuning fork, Get Up and Go test) will also be compared. Multiple linear regression analysis will be conducted, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
At 12 weeks
Dropouts
Time Frame: Prior to the week 12 assessment
Any dropouts prior to the week 12 assessment as failures. Since death is anticipated to be unrelated to the intervention assignment, deaths will be censored. Failures will be analyzed with an aggregate failure variable defined as: experience of neuropathy according to the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score or dropout prior to week 12 (yes vs. no). Logistic regression will be used, adjusted for the stratification factor as a covariate.
Prior to the week 12 assessment
Trajectories over time
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks
Trajectories over time by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN will be compared. Generalized estimating equations with a logit link and robust standard errors will be used, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks
Rates of adverse events
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
Rates of adverse events related to study device (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other AEs as assessed by (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE]) between the three interventions will be compared.
At 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melissa K Accordino, SWOG - Columbia University
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Pennington, MD, NRG - University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S2205 (Other Identifier: CTEP)
  • UG1CA189974 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2022-09251 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • SWOG-S2205 (Other Identifier: DCP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe