Contribution From PET-DOPA in Glioblastoma Re-irradiation - A Randomized Phase II Study (ReciDOPA)

February 2, 2026 updated by: Centre Paul Strauss
ReciDOPA is a phase II, single-stage randomized, multicenter, prospective trial assessing the efficacy of an irradiation protocol based on Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous-integrated boost guided by FDOPA-PET in patient with recurrent glioblastoma.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common cerebral tumor in adults. Despite well-conducted treatments including surgery, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC) protocol, recurrences remain unavoidable within approximately 6 months and the overall survival rate of patients at 5 years is inferior to 10%.

In case of recurrence, a second surgery, radiotherapy under stereotaxic conditions, bevacizumab or other innovative techniques have been proposed. However, they are not yet considered as reference treatments, due to the absence of therapeutic trials definitively proving their efficacy.

Evaluation of GBM progression is based on MRI, corticosteroid intake and clinical status.However, positron emission tomography (PET) is an extremely relevant examination for differentiating between true progression and pseudo-progression. Indeed, an increase in the transfer of amino acids in 18 F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (FDOPA)-PET strongly suggests a recurrence. A local treatment can then be proposed by favoring surgery or, as an option, radiotherapy under stereotactic conditions. However, this treatment, even if it is well tolerated, has an efficacy which could be improved.

Often proposed option to improve efficacy of this radiation technic consists in increasing the dose of irradiation. This dose increase is often limited by the tolerance of nearby healthy tissue. It could however be possible with coupled techniques of intensity modulation and stereotaxy within the framework of an integrated boost (Simultaneous Integrated Boost - SIB). At each radiation session, the dose delivered to the tumor volume would be increased in the metabolic volume (BTV) detected by FDOPA-PET.

The objective of this study is to evaluate, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the efficacy of a dose increase using an SIB in a volume delineated with FDOPA-PET.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67033
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Paul Strauss
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Caroline BUND, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Clara LE FEVRE, MD
        • Contact:
    • De
      • Nancy, De, France, 5400
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHRU de Nancy
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Luc TAILLANDIER, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Glioblastoma, World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV, histologically proven
  • Performance status 0, 1 or 2
  • Neurological status ≥ 2
  • Past irradiation in previsional re-irradiated site or in the vicinity (5 to 7 cm)
  • Radiological proven recurrence according to 1 and 2 criteria, Wen et al
  • Remaining node after partial surgery post-recurrence
  • 1 to 3 recurrence site(s) < 35 mm in wide axis and separated by at least 5 mm
  • Volume of each lesion < 35 mL
  • Distance between recurrence node(s) and optic nerves (left and right), chiasma and/or cerebral trunk > 10 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with contraindication to MRI or PET
  • Glioblastomatose
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Patient that do not understand French
  • Patient without affiliation to the national or local social security
  • Patients not able to comply to the protocol assessments for geographic, social or psychological reasons
  • Minor or patients placed under guardianship or supervision
  • Patients deprived of liberty
  • Patients placed under judicial protection
  • Patients that are not able to express their consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simultaneous-integrated boost with Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
  • Planning Target Volume (PTV) 37,5 Gray (Gy): 37,5 Gy in 6 fractions of 6,25 Gy at the rate of one fraction each 2 days
  • Prescription isodose line (PIL) at 80%, corresponding to 30 Gy as total dose, or 5 Gy per fraction
  • PTV SIB 45 Gy: 45,0 Gy in 6 fractions of 7,50 Gy at the rate of one fraction each 2 days
  • PIL at 80% corresponding to 36 Gy as total dose, or 6 Gy per fraction
Simultaneous-integrated boost guided by FDOPA-PET
No Intervention: Standard IMRT
  • PTV 37,5 Gy: 37,5 Gy in 6 fractions of 6,25 Gy at the rate of one fraction each 2 days
  • PIL at 80%, corresponding to 30 Gy as total dose, or 5 Gy per fraction
  • No SIB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of simultaneous-integrated boost with IMRT guided by FDOPA PET on Recurrence free survival in patient with recurrent glioblastoma
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Recurrence free survival: interval between the date of inclusion in the trial until the date of recurrence of irradiated site (or one of the irradiated sites, in case of multiple irradiation)
up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of recurrence of irradiated sites
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Number of sites with recurrence over the number of irradiated sites
up to 24 months
Characterization of recurrence sites: classified either as distant, marginal or in-field
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Recurrence will be described according to their localisation by comparing images at recurrence with the images used for dosimetry. A recurrence will be defined as " distant" is it appears outside of 80% isodose, as "marginal" if it cuts 80% isodose and as "in-field" if it is completely located in 80% isodose. The 80% isodose is the reference isodose used for radiation therapy prescription.
up to 24 months
Percentage of Recurrence free survival at 6 months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Interval between the date of inclusion in the trial until the date of recurrence of irradiated site (first recurrence, in case of multiple irradiation). Patients that are alive without recurrence at the end of the tiral will be censored
At 6 months
Percentage of Recurrence free survival at 12 months
Time Frame: at 12 months
Interval between the date of inclusion in the trial until the date of recurrence of irradiated site (first recurrence, in case of multiple irradiation). Patients that are alive without recurrence at the end of the tiral will be censored
at 12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date of inclusion until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 72 months
Interval between the date of inclusion in the trial until the date of death whatever the cause. Patients that are alive without recurrence at the end of the tiral will be censored
From date of inclusion until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 72 months
Tolerance of re-irradiation
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Recording of toxicities (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 criteria) at each follow-up visit
up to 24 months
Characterization of PET parameters at recurrence and compare them to baseline parameters with SUV max value
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) max
up to 24 months
Characterization of PET parameters at recurrence and compare them to baseline parameters with SUV mean value
Time Frame: up to 24 months
SUV mean
up to 24 months
Characterization of PET parameters at recurrence and compare them to baseline parameters with SUV peak value
Time Frame: up to 24 months
SUV peak
up to 24 months
Quality of Life at 2 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30items (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: At 2 months

Quality of life will be measure with the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (Cancer 30items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome) or 1 (worse outcome) to 7 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 2 months
Quality of Life at 2 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Neoplasms 20items (QLQ-BN20)
Time Frame: At 2 months

Quality of life will be measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire - BN20 (Brain Neoplasms 20items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 2 months
Quality of Life at 4 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30items (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: At 4 months

Quality of life will be measure with the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (Cancer 30items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome) or 1 (worse outcome) to 7 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 4 months
Quality of Life at 4 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Neoplasms 20items (QLQ-BN20)
Time Frame: At 4 months

Quality of life will be measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire - BN20 (Brain Neoplasms 20items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 4 months
Quality of Life at 6 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30items (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: At 6 months

Quality of life will be measure with the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (Cancer 30items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome) or 1 (worse outcome) to 7 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 6 months
Quality of Life at 6 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Neoplasms 20items (QLQ-BN20)
Time Frame: At 6 months

Quality of life will be measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire - BN20 (Brain Neoplasms 20items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 6 months
Quality of Life at 12 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30items (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: At 12 months

Quality of life will be measure with the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (Cancer 30items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome) or 1 (worse outcome) to 7 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 12 months
Quality of Life at 12 months measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Neoplasms 20items (QLQ-BN20)
Time Frame: At 12 months

Quality of life will be measured with Quality of Life Questionnaire - BN20 (Brain Neoplasms 20items).

All items are scored 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

At 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma

Clinical Trials on Simultaneous-integrated boost with IMRT

Subscribe