Denosumab vs Alendronate After Vertebroplasty

February 18, 2023 updated by: Shenzhen People's Hospital

Denosumab vs Alendronate in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients had a proportion of secondary fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Denosumab and alendronate is both effective to prevent bone loss for OVCF postmenopausal women. However, trial evidence comparing effect of denosumab vs zoledronate after PVP was unknown. The study aims to assess the efficiency of denosumab vs alendronate for OVCF patients bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), secondary fracture and adverse events after PVP

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Whether denosumab was non-inferior than alendronate in improving bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), functional status questionnaires, and secondary fracture in elderly patients with OVCF after PVP remains unknown. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in OVCF patients with PVP was performed. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of denosumab vs alendronate on BMD, BTMs, functional status, secondary fracture rate, and adverse events in OVCF patients after PVP during a 12-month follow-up period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be age between 50 and 85 years old

    • X-ray diagnosis of 1 or 2 segment vertebral compression fractures from T4 to L5
    • Bone mineral density T value less than -1 via dual-energy X-ray
    • A recent fracture history less than 6 weeks
    • MRI show bone marrow edema of fractured vertebrae
    • low back pain, local paravertebral tenderness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must be able to have no intervertebral fissure

    • Must be able to have no infection
    • Must be able to have no malignancy
    • Must be able to have no neurological dysfunction
    • Must be able to have no previous use of anti-osteoporosis drugs
    • Must be able to have no inability to perform magnetic resonance imaging
    • Must be able to have no prior back open surgery
    • Must be able to have no other established contraindications for elective surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Denosumab
1 ml (60 mg) of denosumab (Prolia; Amgen, Inc) subcutaneous injection plus intravenous placebo every 6 months
1 ml (60 mg) of denosumab (Prolia; Amgen, Inc) subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • Denosumab 6 month/subcutaneous
oral placebo weekly
Active Comparator: alendronate
oral 70 mg alendronate sodium weekly.
oral placebo weekly
oral 70 mg alendronate sodium weekly plus subcutaneous placebo per 6 month.
Other Names:
  • oral alendronate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Femoral neck BMD
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Femoral neck BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month via dual-energy X-ray
up to 12 months
C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide (CTX)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Bone resorption marker, CTX were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
up to 12 months
Total hip BMD
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Total hip BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual-energy X-ray.
up to 12 months
Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide (P1NP)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Bone formation marker, P1NP were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
up to 12 months
Lumbar bone mineral density(BMD)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Lumbar vertebral (L1 to L4, except the surgery segment) BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual energy X-ray
up to 12 months
Visual analog scale (VAS) back
Time Frame: up to 12 months
The VAS score for back pain were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with "0" and the other "10" respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain
up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The EQ-5D Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 12 month
The EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire evaluates health status consisting five dimensions: mobility, selfcare, performance of usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. After conversion, the index was between 0 and 1.0 (minimum score: 0, indicating worst health state; full score:1.0, indicating full health).
up to 12 month
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to 12 month
The main adverse events including deep venous thrombosis, pneumonia, acute renal failure, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, influenza, transfer to intensive care unit, joint pain, headache, nausea, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture and rash.
up to 12 month
Secondary fracture rate
Time Frame: up to 12 month
Secondary fracture rate containing vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture was assessed at 12 month after surgery. The lowest score was 0, the highest score was 100%. The lower score 0 represents no secondary fracture.
up to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is scored by 24 adding up the number of items checked "yes" on different low back pain-related daily activity disabilities. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores 24 indicating a higher level of disability related to low back pain and lowest 0 represents no back pain
up to 12 month
The QUALEFFO-31 Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 12 month
The Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31), which contains three domains including pain, physical function, and mental function. This scale is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the highest QoL and 100 the lowest
up to 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 20, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ShenzhenPH06

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Denosumab Allergy

Clinical Trials on Denosumab

3
Subscribe