Beta-lactam Intermittent Versus Continuous Infusion and Combination Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (BICCS)

April 10, 2024 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Patients hospitalized in ICU with sepsis (infection with life-threatening organ dysfunction according to sepsis 3.0 definitions) or septic shock presumably due to MDR-GNB (multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria). The study will be a prospective multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative continuous vs. intermittent pivotal βL (Beta Lactamine) antibiotic infusion strategies and combination vs. monotherapy trial conducted with a 2X2 factorial design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be a prospective multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative continuous vs. intermittent pivotal βL antibiotic infusion strategies and combination vs. monotherapy trial conducted with a 2X2 factorial design.

Patients will be randomized to one of four of the following treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified on the centre and the initial βL administered (meropenem versus other) to receive (i) βL antibiotic either as a continuous infusion: CID group or as intermittent infusion: IID group, and (ii) either at most 1 dose (short duration) : AMT group or 5 days (long duration) : ACT group of aminoglycoside

  • Arm A: continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (Antibiotics) (CID group) AND AG (Aminoglycoside) infusion for 5 days (long duration) as appropriate combination therapy (ACT group)
  • Arm B: intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (IID = control group) AND AG infusion for 5 days (long duration) as appropriate combination therapy (ACT = group)
  • Arm C: continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (CID group) AND AG infusion at most 1 dose (AMT group)
  • Arm D: intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (IID = group) AND AG infusion at most 1 dose (AMT group)

The primary objective of the study is to compare the 30-day mortality of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis in the ICU according to the mode of administration of the pivotal βL antibiotic (CID group vs. IID group).

The primary endpoint is the mortality rate at day 30 between CID and IID groups while the Co-primary objective is to compare the MAKE 30 (Major Adverse Kidney Events within 30 days) between patients that will receive an appropriate monotherapy with βL (AMT group) or an appropriate combination therapy with βL and 5 days of AG (ACT group).

moreover, The co-primary criterion is the percentage of patients with a MAKE 30, i.e. when patients met one of the following criteria within day 30: in-hospital mortality, receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT) or persistent renal dysfunction (discharge serum creatinine/baseline serum creatinine ≥200%) between AMT and ACT groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Amiens-Picardie
      • Argenteuil, France, 95100
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Réanimation polyvalente - CH d'Argenteuil - Hôpital Victor Dupuy
      • Avignon, France, 84000
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin
        • Contact:
      • Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 92100
      • Béthune, France, 62660
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Réanimation et soins continus - CH Béthune - Beuvry
        • Contact:
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Gabriel Montpied
      • Clichy, France, 92110
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Anesthésie - Réanimation - Beaujon
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation-Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée
        • Contact:
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Grenoble-Alpes Hôpital Michallon
      • Le Chesnay, France, 78150
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Réanimation polyvalente - CH de Versailles - Hôpital André Mignot
      • Le Mans, France, 72037
        • Recruiting
        • Réanimation Médico Chirurgicale & USC - CH Le Mans
        • Contact:
      • Lyon, France, 69437
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - HCL - Edouard Herriot
      • Metz, France, 57085
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Réanimation polyvalente - CHR Metz-Thionville - Hôpital de Mercy
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
      • Nice, France, 06202
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Nice - Hôpital Archet
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Recruiting
        • Médecine intensive et réanimation infectieuse - Bichat
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Réanimation chirurgicale - Bichat
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Poitiers - Site de la Milétrie
        • Contact:
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Anesthésie - Réanimation - CHU Poitiers - Site de la Milétrie
      • Reims, France, 51100
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Médecine intensive et réanimation polyvalente 6 CHU de Reims - Hôpital Robert Debré
        • Contact:
      • Saint-Denis, France, 93200
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation-CH St Denis - Hôpital Delafontaine
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091
        • Recruiting
        • Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital Civil
        • Contact:
      • Étampes, France, 91150
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Réanimation polyvalente/Surveillance continue - CH Sud Essonne-Etampes
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥ 18 years)
  • Hospital-acquired sepsis or septic shock diagnosed in the past 24 hours (according to sepsis 3.0 definitions)
  • One of the following risk factors for gram negative multidrug resistant pathogens:

    • Prior intravenous antibiotic use within 7 days prior to sepsis onset with the exception of antibiotic effective only against Gram-positive bacteria, penicillin A and macrolides
    • Prolonged hospital stay (≥ 15 days of hospitalization) within 90 days prior to the occurrence of sepsis
    • Prolonged mechanical ventilation (≥ 5 days on mechanical ventilation) within 90 days prior to sepsis onset
    • Patients with indwelling devices (dialysis access lines, intravascular lines, urinary catheter, endotracheal or tracheostomy tube, gastrostomy or jejunostomy feeding tube)
    • Patients known to be infected, colonized or carriers of MDR gram negative bacteria in the past 3 months
    • Exposure to an antibiotic (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, C2G, C3G, fluoroquinolones) in the previous 3 months
    • A trip abroad within 3 months to known geographical areas at risk (in particular the Indian subcontinent, South-East Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, the Mediterranean Basin)
    • A functional or organic abnormality of the urinary tract in case of urinary tract infection.
  • Appropriate bacteriological sampling performed before starting antimicrobial therapy
  • Expected stay in ICU of more than 3 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A priori known resistance to all the proposed beta-lactams or to amikacin Need for extrarenal treatment at inclusion according to the criteria of Gaudry et al.
  • Known hypersensitivity to ceftazidim, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepim, meropenem, ceftazidim-avibactam, ceftazolane-avibactam or to any of the excipients included in the corresponding pharmaceutical drugs,
  • Known hypersensitivity to any cephalosporin antibacterial agent,
  • Know hypersentitivity to any penem antibacterial agent,
  • Severe known hypersensitivity (eg, anaphylactic reaction, severe skin reaction) to any other beta-lactam antibiotic (eg, penicillins or monobactam ) or to any of its excipients.
  • Known contraindication to the aminoglycoside family including
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance, to any aminoglycoside antibacterial agent or to any of the excipients included in the corresponding pharmaceutical drugs,
  • Cirrhosis of grades B and C according to the Child-Pugh classification.
  • Myasthenia gravis.
  • Simultaneous administration of another aminoglycoside
  • Association with ataluren
  • Non-complicated urinary tract infection (with the exception of acute prostatitis)
  • Bone marrow transplant or chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
  • Infections for which long-term antibiotic treatment > 8 days is strongly recommended (i.e., infective endocarditis, osteoarticular infections, anterior mediastinitis after cardiac surgery, hepatic or cerebral abscesses, chronic prostatitis for instance
  • Presence of antibiotic therapy for the new sepsis (if sepsis acquired in the hospital outside the resuscitation> 2 doses of antibiotics)
  • Hospitalization in a short stay hospital of more than 48 hours
  • Limitation of life support (comfort care applied only) at the time of screening
  • Enrolment to another interventional study
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Subject deprived of freedom, subject under a legal protective measure
  • Non affiliation to any health insurance system
  • Refusal to participate to the study (patient or legal representative or family member or close relative if present)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal AND AG infusion for 5 days
continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (CID group) AND AG infusion for 5 days (long duration) as appropriate combination therapy (ACT group)
continuous pivotal βL-AB
Other Names:
  • CID group
AG infusion for 5 days (ACT Group)
Other Names:
  • ACT Group
Experimental: intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB ND AG infusion for 5 days
intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (IID = control group) AND AG infusion for 5 days (long duration) as appropriate combination therapy (ACT = group)
AG infusion for 5 days (ACT Group)
Other Names:
  • ACT Group
intermittent pivotal βL-AB (IID = control group)
Other Names:
  • IID control group
Experimental: continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB AND AG infusion at most 1 dose
continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (CID group) AND AG infusion at most 1 dose (AMT group )
continuous pivotal βL-AB
Other Names:
  • CID group
AG infusion most 1 dose (AMT group )
Other Names:
  • AMT group
Experimental: intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB AND AG infusion at most 1 dose
intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (IID = group) AND AG infusion at most 1 dose (AMT group)
intermittent pivotal βL-AB (IID = control group)
Other Names:
  • IID control group
AG infusion most 1 dose (AMT group )
Other Names:
  • AMT group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the 30-day mortality of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis in the ICU
Time Frame: 30 days after acquiring sepsis
the primary objective is to compare the 30-day mortality of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis in the ICU according to the mode of administration of the pivotal βL antibiotic (CID group vs. IID group).
30 days after acquiring sepsis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
New carriage, colonization or infection with one of the following BMR-GNB: at days 3, 7 and 30:
Time Frame: days 3,7and 30
Percentage of patients with new carriage of MDR-GNB(taking into account all clinical samples and rectal surveillance swabs performed routinely each week),i.e one of the following ticarcillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Acinetobacter baumannii,or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; extended-spectrum β-lactam-producing Entero bacteriaceae;high-concentration cephalosporinase producing AmpC Enterobacteriaceae;
days 3,7and 30
30 day mortality in patient with proven Gram-negative infection
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Mortality rate at day 30 in patients with proven GNI
30 days after inclusion
30 day mortality in patient with proven non-fermentative GNI
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Mortality rate at day 30 in patients with proven non-fermentative GNI,
30 days after inclusion
30 day mortality in patient with proven GNI for which the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the βL used were higher to the breakpoints according to the European committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Mortality rate at day 30 in patients with proven GNI for which the MIC of the βL used were higher to the accepted break-points
30 days after inclusion
30-day mortality in patients that received non-carbapenem-βL
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Mortality rate at day 30 in patients that received non-carbapenem-βL
30 days after inclusion
30-day clinical recovery
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Clinical recovery at day 30 defined as admission clinical symptom resolved
30 days after inclusion
30-day clinical recovery
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Clinical recovery at day 30 defined as admission organ failures resolved with persistence of admission clinical symptoms and time to clinical recovery
30 days after inclusion
PK-PD (pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic) target attainment
Time Frame: at day 1, i.e. 24 hours after the loading dose and at day 3, i.e. 72 hours after the loading dose

PK-PD target attainment rate evaluated as a dichotomous variable

o For βL (trough or plateau concentration according to randomization group), at day 1, i.e. 24 hours after the loading dose and at day 3, i.e. 72 hours after the loading dose

§ Target attainment scored "Yes" if measured drug concentration exceeded greater than four times to the causative pathogen MIC as 100% fT > 4*MIC

at day 1, i.e. 24 hours after the loading dose and at day 3, i.e. 72 hours after the loading dose
PK-PD (pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic) target attainment
Time Frame: 30 min after the end of the first infusion dose (CMAX)

For AG, 30 min after the end of the first infusion dose (CMAX)

§ Target attainment scored "Yes" if measured drug concentration to causative pathogen MIC ratio is greater than 12 as CMAX/MIC > 12

30 min after the end of the first infusion dose (CMAX)
Superinfection (primary infection site) or new infection (different infection site) at day 30 due to a GNB resistant to the βL administered at inclusion
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Percentage of patients with superinfection or new nosocomial infection with GNB resistant to the βL administered at inclusion until day 30
30 days after inclusion
Microbiological failure persistence of the same microorganism at the same site at end-of-therapy (EOT) or within 7 days after EOT.
Time Frame: 7 days after inclusion
Percentage of patients for whom the microorganism is still recovered in bacterial culture from the initial infected site at EOT or within 7 days after EOT
7 days after inclusion
New carriage, colonization or infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa not susceptible to the βL administered at days 3, 7 and 30
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Percentage of patients with new carriage colonization or infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa not susceptible to the βL administered until day 30
30 days after inclusion
Duration of organ failure between day 1 and day 30
Time Frame: day 1 and day 30
Organ failures assessed by AUCSOFA and its organ components measured between day 1 and day 30
day 1 and day 30
Length of ICU and hospital stays
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Length of ICU and hospital stays until day 30
30 days after inclusion
Occurrence of adverse events at day 30
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Percentage of patients with encephalopathy (delay between inclusion and 2 RASS scores = -1 in a row) or renal failure at discharge (RRT or persistent renal dysfunction) until day 30
30 days after inclusion
180-day mortality
Time Frame: 180 days after inclusion
Mortality rate at day 180
180 days after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Aline DECHANET, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP180596

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

3
Subscribe