- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05684510
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy (malocclusion)
Evaluation of Efficacy of Clear Aligners in Correction of Class II Malocclusion Using Intermaxillary Elastics: A Randomized Controlled
Patient with class ii division 1 malocclusion who have mild increased overjet will be treated in this study. The efficacy of clear aligners in the treatment of Class II division 1 Malocclusion Using Intermaxillary Elastics will be assessed. The skeletal, dental and soft tissues changes resulted by this intervention will be studied and compared with the results of Traditional treatment with fixed appliances.
There are two group:
- a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the clear aligners with class ii elastics.
- a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the traditional fixed appliances with class ii elastics.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patient with class ii division 1 malocclusion who have mild increased overjet will be treated in this study. The efficacy of clear aligners in the treatment of Class II division 1 Malocclusion Using Intermaxillary Elastics will be assessed. The skeletal, dental and soft tissues changes resulted by this intervention will be studied and compared with the results of Traditional treatment with fixed appliances.
There are two group:
- a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the clear aligners with class ii elastics.
- a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the traditional fixed appliances with class ii elastics.
phase Intervention/treatment Condition or disease Not applicable Other: clear aligners Technique with class ii elastics. Other: fixed multibracket appliances with class ii elastics Malocclusion
Class ii Division 1 malocclusion
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: FATIMA NASHTR, MSc
- Email: fatimahnashtar96@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Fadi Jnaid
- Phone Number: 988499015
- Email: Drfadijnaid@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Hama Governorate
-
Hama, Hama Governorate, Syria
- Recruiting
- Hama University
-
Contact:
- FATIMA NASHTR
- Email: fatimahnashtar96@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Fadi Jnaid
- Phone Number: 988499015
- Email: Drfadijnaid@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- - Patients with permanent occlusion at age 15-20 years.
- Patients with class II division I (half cusp or Less) with moderate overjet (2-4mm).
- Patients with normal or horizontal growth pattern.
- Mild crowding (_<2 mm) in maxillary and mandibular arch.
- Patient with satisfactory periodontal health and good oral hygiene
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- Comprehensive medical and dental history ruling out any systemic disease.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with periodontal disease.
- Patients with vertical growth pattern.
- Patients with missing or extracted teeth except third molar.
- Patients with temporomandibular joint disorder.
- Patients with Skeletal open bite.
- Patients with poor oral and gingival health
- Patients with neuromuscular disorder.
- Patients with severe skeletal class II.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental : clear aligners with class II elastics technique
clear aligners technique A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to clear aligners treatment with class II elastics ( clear aligners will be applied to the upper and lower arch, then a class II elastics 1\4 and 6,5 oz will be use from the precision-cut Hook on the maxillary aligner to the button of mandibular first molar
|
clear aligners will be applied to the upper and lower arch, then a class II elastics 1\4 and 6,5 oz will be use from the precision-cut Hook on the maxillary aligner to the button of mandibular first molar
|
|
Experimental: : traditional treatment Fixed appliances with class II elastics.
A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the fixed multibracket treatment (with slot size 0.022 × 0.028 and MBT prescription , after completing leveling and alignment , Elastics will be applied from the hooks of canines brackets to the hooks of lower first molar when the 0.019× 0.025-inch stainless steel archwires placed.
|
Agroup of patients in which participants will be undergo to the fixed multibracket treatment (with slot size 0.022 × 0.028 and MBT prescription , after completing leveling and alignment , Elastics will be applied from the hooks of canines brackets to the hooks of lower first molar when the 0.019× 0.025-inch stainless steel archwires placed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the SNA angle
Time Frame: : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group
|
This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
: T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group
|
|
change in the SNB angle
Time Frame: : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved(expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
This angle the represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
: T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved(expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in ANB angle
Time Frame: T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
This angle the represents the spatial relationship between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in SN.POG angle
Time Frame: : T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
This angle the represents the position of the chin bone in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in the mandibular length [
Time Frame: T0: 1day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
Amount of distance measured from the Co point to Gn point in the cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
T0: 1day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in SN.PP angle [
Time Frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
This angle the represents the amount and direction of rotation of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in MP.SN angle
Time Frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
This angle the represents the amount of backward rotation of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in overbite
Time Frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
Amount of coverage the upper incisor to lower incisor in the vertical plane in the cephalometric analysis.
|
T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
|
change in overjet
Time Frame: : T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
Represents The distance between the most anterior point on the lower incisor to the most anterior point on the upper incisor in the cephalometric analysis.
|
: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 4-6 months in the exp. Group and 12 months in the control group)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: FATIMA NASHTR, MSc, Hama University
- Study Director: Rabab AlSabbag, Professor, Hama University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Hama University -
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityPEBS DENTAL CLINICRecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I MalocclusionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hesham Nabil Ali Al-QamhawyAl-Azhar UniversityRecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I MalocclusionEgypt
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedClass III Skeletal MalocclusionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionGöteborg University; Region Halland; Västra GötalandsregionenNot yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | OverjetSweden
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakRecruiting
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridOrtoestetic (https://ortoestetic.com)Not yet recruiting
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion | Mandibular RetrognathismTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSIONSyria
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Sichuan UniversityCompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSIONChina
Clinical Trials on clear aligners
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoAmerican Association of Orthodontists FoundationRecruitingMalocclusion | Misaligned TeethUnited States
-
Tishreen UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Pathological Resorption of External RootSyrian Arab Republic
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingCleft Lip and Palate | Maxillary DeficiencyEgypt
-
Riyadh Elm UniversityActive, not recruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Taste Perception | Fixed Orthodontic AppliancesSaudi Arabia
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownRemovable Aligners, Conventional BracketsEgypt
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesRecruitingMalocclusionUnited States, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Samia OmarNot yet recruiting
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedCrowding | Malocclusion, Angle Class I | Malocclusion; Displaced or Missing TeethSyrian Arab Republic
-
University of Rome Tor VergataCompleted
-
British University In EgyptAin Shams UniversityCompleted