Effects of a Daily Cognition Training in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment

April 13, 2023 updated by: Prof. Dr. Eduardo J Fernández Rodríguez, University of Salamanca

Effects of a Daily Cognition Training Programme on Cognitive Function, Emotional State, Frailty and Functionality in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment

To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in cognitively unimpaired older adults on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of programmes that use everyday cognition for the assessment and intervention of healthy elderly people with the aim of maintaining or improving autonomy, compared to other programmes based on traditional cognitive stimulation, whose benefits do not generalise to significant improvements in everyday life. In addition, the investigators seek to relate how the presence of depression in older people impacts on everyday cognition, and therefore on the functionality of IADLs.

2. WORKING HYPOTHESIS AND MAIN OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED

  1. WORKING HYPOTHESES

    • Alternative hypothesis (H1): Everyday cognition training programmes are more effective than traditional cognitive stimulation on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality in older adults without cognitive impairment.
    • Null hypothesis (Ho): Everyday cognition training programmes are not more effective than traditional cognitive stimulation on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality in older adults without cognitive impairment.

    In order to validate or disprove the main hypothesis, the following objectives have been developed:

  2. OBJECTIVES:

i. MAIN OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in older adults without cognitive impairment, for cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality.

ii. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:

  • To compare the differences in the emotional state of older adults without cognitive impairment between the everyday cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
  • To contrast the differences in the cognitive function of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
  • To analyse the differences in the frailty index of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
  • To identify the differences in the functionality of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

99

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • España
      • Salamanca, España, Spain, 37002
        • Eduardo Jose Fernandez Rodriguez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be aged 60 years or older.
  • Voluntarily sign the informed consent form about the project, authorising their participation.
  • Carry out the initial assessment.
  • Be admitted to the programme from the start of the programme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No literacy skills or significant deficits in language comprehension.
  • Institutionalised person.
  • Have a clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
  • Participate in another cognitive stimulation programme during the intervention process.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: traditional cognitive stimulation
The control group will carry out the programme based on traditional cognitive stimulation. Individual cognitive skills such as attention, memory, executive functions, orientation, praxis, calculation, visual perception and reasoning will be trained. The materials and media used will be a cognitive stimulation notebook created for the study which includes cards in printed paper format to be completed by the participants.
Individual cognitive skills such as attention, memory, executive functions, orientation, praxis, calculation, visual perception and reasoning will be trained. The materials and media used will be a cognitive stimulation notebook created for the study which includes cards in printed paper format to be completed by the participants.
Experimental: programme based on everyday cognition
The experimental group, on the other hand, will carry out a programme based on everyday cognition, i.e. the use of cognitive functions to solve real everyday problems that occur in our daily lives and that allow us to be autonomous in our homes, such as preparing food, taking care of the house, using transport, shopping, using the telephone, medication, financial management and access to information and current affairs. As material for use as for the traditional cognitive stimulation sessions, a training booklet on everyday cognition has been created which includes all the sessions mentioned above.
Will carry out a programme based on everyday cognition, As material for use as for the traditional cognitive stimulation sessions, a training booklet on everyday cognition has been created which includes all the sessions mentioned above. Each day one of these tasks will be worked on.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Everyday cognition.
Time Frame: 35 minutes
The Test for the Assessment of Everyday Cognition measures the ability of older people to solve everyday problems through performance tasks whose resolution depends on their cognitive capacity. The abilities tested are planning ability and cognitive flexibility, verbal working memory, reasoning, episodic memory, episodic memory and crystallised intelligence. The result is a direct estimation of the person's functional capacity by means of 12 real situations grouped into 6 areas: medication, administrative management, financial management, meal preparation, transport and shopping. The administration time is about 35 minutes.
35 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive function.
Time Frame: 10 minutes
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT TEST (MoCA test) Versión 8.3. :It is a cognitive assessment tool created to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI). It evaluates executive functions, attention, abstraction, memory, language, visual-constructive abilities, calculation and orientation. It takes approximately 10 minutes to administer. The maximum score is 30 points, below 26 points being the cut-off for MCI (in developed countries).
10 minutes
Emotional state.
Time Frame: 10minutes
Yesavage: It is a screening questionnaire for depression in people over 65 years of age. The 15-item version was selected for this study. It expresses the degree of satisfaction, quality of life and feelings. Of the 15 items, 10 indicate the presence of depression if answered positively, while the remaining 5 items answered negatively indicate depression. The administration time is 5 minutes. A score above 5 shows moderate depression and above 10 severe depression.
10minutes
Instrumental activities of daily living
Time Frame: 5 minutes
LAWTON AND BRODY SCALE: This is an assessment designed to evaluate autonomy in IADLs in the elderly population. It consists of eight items: use of the telephone, shopping, meal preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transport, medication management, use of transport and money. It takes 4 minutes to administer and is scored 0 or 1 for each item, making a total score of 8. At present, it is influenced by a gender bias as it is more sensitive to women than men (many of the activities have been performed only by women throughout history).
5 minutes
Functionality.
Time Frame: 15 minutes
FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE (FIM): This is a tool created to measure the level of functionality and assistance given by the caregiver. It assesses the activities of daily living subdivided into two dimensions: the motor dimension; which assesses self-care (feeding, personal grooming, bathing, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, perineal grooming), sphincter control (bladder and bowel), transfers (to and from the chair or wheelchair, transfer in the bathroom, bath or shower) and locomotion (walking or moving around in a wheelchair, going up or down stairs). And cognitive; which assesses communication (comprehension, expression) and social knowledge (social interaction, problem solving and memory). Each of the 18 items has a maximum score of 7 and a minimum score of 1, making a total of 126.
15 minutes
Fragility.
Time Frame: 5 minutes
FRAILTY SCALE: This is an assessment designed to quantitatively measure frailty in geriatric patients. It consists of 5 questions on real-life situations in which some frailty may affect quality of life. The maximum score is 5 points.
5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data will be made available upon request by contacting the following e-mail address: edujfr@usal.es.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From the start of recruitment until two years after the end of recruitment.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All data will be made available upon request by contacting the following e-mail address: edujfr@usal.es.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on programme based on everyday cognition

3
Subscribe