- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05731973
Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Versus Epidural Analgesia for Nuss Repair of Pectus Excavatum (ICE)
Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Minimal Invasive Nuss Repair of Pectus Excavatum: a Randomized Clinical Trial (ICE Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: Intercostal nerve cryoablation
- Drug: Intercostal nerve block (single shot bupivacaine (1.25 mg/ml))
- Drug: Opioids (oxycodone with prolonged discharge 10 mg PO every 12 hours and oxycodone 5 mg every 6 hours, as needed)
- Drug: Thoracic epidural analgesia (continuous infusion with sufentanyl (1 µg/ml) and bupivacaine (1.25 mg/ml))
Detailed Description
Rationale: The minimal invasive Nuss procedure is currently considered the treatment of choice for pectus excavatum. This procedure is usually associated with severe postoperative pain as great forces are employed on the thoracic cage to correct the sternal depression. Pain is the main limiting factor for early discharge. Epidural analgesia is currently considered gold standard for postoperative pain treatment. Alternative pain management strategies (e.g., patient-controlled analgesia and paravertebral nerve block) have also been described but fail in accomplishing adequate prolonged post-operative pain management. Alternatively, continuous use of opioids comes with side-effects like severe nausea, urinary retention and obstipation. Intercostal nerve cryoablation seems a promising novel technique for postoperative analgesia. Prior studies comparing intercostal cryoablation to other pain treatment modalities after pectus excavatum repair through the minimal invasive Nuss procedure report promising results, but pose significant limitations (e.g., small sample size, retrospective nature with non-matched patient groups or considerable confounders).
Objective: Primary objective of the current study is to determine the impact of intercostal nerve cryoablation on postoperative length of hospital stay compared to standard pain management of young pectus excavatum patients treated with the minimal invasive Nuss procedure.
Study design: The study protocol is designed for a single center, prospective, unblinded, randomized clinical trial.
Study population & intervention: Intercostal nerve cryoablation will be compared to thoracic epidural analgesia in young pectus excavatum patients (i.e., 12-24 years of age) treated with the minimal invasive Nuss procedure. Block randomization, including stratification based on age (12-16 years and 17-24 years) and sex, with an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be performed.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Postoperative length of hospital stay will be recorded as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes include: 1) pain intensity; 2) operative time; 3) opioid usage; 4) complications, including neuropathic pain; 5) creatine kinase activity; 6)intensive care unit admissions; 7) readmissions; 8) postoperative mobility; 9) health related quality of Life; 10) days to return to work/school; 11) number of postoperative outpatient visits and 12) hospital costs.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The risks for study participants are negligible as the cryoablation technique has already been effectively used in the Nuss procedure without any serious side effects. Also, participants will be monitored daily by nursing staff and surgeons while admitted to the hospital. Burden associated with participation in the current study consists of completion of several questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, 6419 PC
- Zuyderland Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing the minimal invasive Nuss procedure for surgical repair of pectus excavatum.
- Young patients (12-24 years of age) according to the definition used by the World Health Organization. This cut-off point is chosen to create a more homogenous patient sample, as the thoracic cage is fully matured by the age of 24, in size and density, which will have an effect on postoperative pain.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A chest wall deformity other than pectus excavatum;
- Opioid use in the 3 months prior to surgery;
- Pain syndrome (e.g., fibromyalgia) or neuropathic pain prior to surgical repair of pectus excavatum;
- Connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome);
- Previous thoracic surgery or pectus excavatum repair;
- Contraindication for intercostal nerve cryoablation or thoracic epidural analgesia (e.g., patient refusal, infection at the site of cannulation, uncontrolled systemic infection, bleeding diathesis, increased intracranial pressure, mechanical spine obstruction);
- Psychiatric disease currently receiving treatment;
- Not mastering the Dutch language;
- Participation in another clinical trial that may interfere with the current trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intercostal nerve cryoablation
When a patient is allocated to the intercostal nerve cryoablation group, cryoablation will be performed prior to bar placement.
In brief, cryoablation will be performed at the level of the bar and two levels above and below, bilaterally.
For this, a second portal access will be placed for video guidance on the contralateral side, and the cryoprobe (cryoICE, Atricure, Masion, OH, USA) will be inserted through the thoracic incisions that are already made for bar placement.
The probe will be placed at the inferior aspect of the ribs, posterior to the midaxillary line, directly on the neurovascular bundle.
One freezing cycle takes 2 minutes, and a temperature of -60 ⁰C will be applied.
The probe will be warmed to room temperature before removing it from the pleura to prevent additional trauma.
Furthermore, intercostal nerve cryoablation will be combined with single shot bupivacaine (1.25 mg/ml) intercostal nerve blocks placed just anterior to the side of the cryoablation.
|
Intercostal nerve cryoablation is applied during Nuss procedure.
Other Names:
Single shot bupivacaine (1.25 mg/ml) intercostal nerve blocks are placed just anterior to the side of the cryoablation.
Other Names:
Opioids
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Thoracic epidural (local continuous infusion with sufentanyl (1 µg/ml) and bupivacaine (1.25 mg/ml))
Prior to surgery, an anesthesiologist will place the thoracic epidural at T5-T6 or T6-T7 interspace in the awake patient.
After correct placement, a local continuous infusion with sufentanyl (1 µg/ml) and bupivacaine (1.25 mg/ml) will be started.
At the third postoperative day, thoracic epidural analgesia will be ceased and transitioned to oral pain medication at discretion of the pain management team.
In general, opioids (oxycodone with prolonged discharge 10 mg PO every 12 hours and oxycodone 5 mg every 6 hours as needed) will be provided 12 hours before thoracic epidural analgesia is ceased.
|
Opioids
Other Names:
Thoracic epidural is placed prior to Nuss procedure
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Hospitalization period, average of 5 days
|
Number of days of hospital admittance after the Nuss procedure.
|
Hospitalization period, average of 5 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Preoperative care unit before surgery, in the morning on postoperative day 1 and 2, and 7 days, 14 days, 3 months and 6 months post operation
|
Pain intensity at rest and during mobilization.
Pain scores will be rated on the numeric rating scale (NRS, 1-10)
|
Preoperative care unit before surgery, in the morning on postoperative day 1 and 2, and 7 days, 14 days, 3 months and 6 months post operation
|
|
Operative time
Time Frame: During Nuss procedure
|
Operative time in minutes.
Duration of cryoablation will be assessed separately.
Operative time will not include the time needed for the placement of the thoracic epidural as placement will be performed in the preoperative care unit.
|
During Nuss procedure
|
|
Intensive care unit admission
Time Frame: Hospitalization period, average of 5 days
|
Intensive care unit admission due to the occurrence of perioperative complications in absolute numbers
|
Hospitalization period, average of 5 days
|
|
Length of intensive care unit admission
Time Frame: Hospitalization period, average of 5 days
|
Length of admission due to the occurrence of perioperative complications in absolute numbers.
|
Hospitalization period, average of 5 days
|
|
Number of readmissions
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
Number of readmissions denoted as absolute numbers.
|
6 months postoperative
|
|
Length of readmissions
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
length of readmissions denoted as absolute numbers.
|
6 months postoperative
|
|
Degree of mobility
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 and 2
|
Degree of mobility measured on a 4-point scale (i.e., 1. on the bed, 2. to the chair, 3. to the toilet, 4. outside the patient's hospital room) during postoperative day 1 and 2.
|
Postoperative day 1 and 2
|
|
HRQOL - PEEQ
Time Frame: Before surgery as a baseline measurement, and at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical procedure
|
HRQOL, measured by the Dutch version of the pectus evaluation questionnaire (PEEQ).
The PEEQ is a validated disease specific questionnaire evaluating the quality of life in pectus excavatum patients (37,38).
|
Before surgery as a baseline measurement, and at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical procedure
|
|
HRQOL - SF-36
Time Frame: Before surgery as a baseline measurement, and at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical procedure
|
HRQOL, measured by the Dutch version of the short form health survey (SF-36)(37-40).
The SF-36 is a generic questionnaire that taps health in eight dimensions (39).
|
Before surgery as a baseline measurement, and at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical procedure
|
|
HRQOL - EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Before surgery as a baseline measurement, and at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical procedure
|
HRQOL, measured by the Dutch version of the EuroQol 5 dimensions 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) (37-40).
For the EQ-5D-5L, participants will rate their health in 5 dimensions on 5 levels and will give an overall score of their health on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (40).
|
Before surgery as a baseline measurement, and at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical procedure
|
|
Days to return to work/school
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
Days to return to work/school, reported as days between discharge from hospital and return to work or school.
|
6 months postoperative
|
|
Postoperative visits
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
Number of postoperative outpatient visits and telephone appointments denoted as absolute numbers in the first 6 months after the surgical procedure.
|
6 months postoperative
|
|
Hospital costs
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
Hospital costs, reported as hospital costs during initial hospitalization (e.g., medication, patient care supply, surgical equipment), and hospital costs after discharge until 6 months follow-up (e.g., medications, outpatient visits, (opioid related) readmissions).
|
6 months postoperative
|
|
Opioid usage
Time Frame: postoperative day 1 and 2, and first 2 weeks after surgery
|
A) Intraoperative administered opioids; B) Opioid usage during postoperative day 0, 1 and 2 at the recovery unit and surgical ward; C) Opioid usage within the first 2 weeks after surgery.
Opioid usage will be converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
|
postoperative day 1 and 2, and first 2 weeks after surgery
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
Complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
The most common procedure- and analgesia-related complications are defined in Supplementary Materials Table 1-2 for transparency, including neuropathic pain.
Occurrence of neuropathic pain will be actively monitored during the hospitalization period, and during all follow-up appointments.
|
6 months postoperative
|
|
Creatine kinase (CK) activity
Time Frame: Preoperative and day 1 postoperative
|
CK levels will be assessed prior to the surgical procedure (i.e., baseline measurement during routine blood evaluation on the day of surgery) and on postoperative day 1.
CK levels will be denoted in U/L.
|
Preoperative and day 1 postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Erik R De Loos, Zuyderland Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Graves CE, Moyer J, Zobel MJ, Mora R, Smith D, O'Day M, Padilla BE. Intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation During the Nuss procedure reduces length of stay and opioid requirement: A randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Nov;54(11):2250-2256. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.057. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
- Croitoru DP, Kelly RE Jr, Goretsky MJ, Lawson ML, Swoveland B, Nuss D. Experience and modification update for the minimally invasive Nuss technique for pectus excavatum repair in 303 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Mar;37(3):437-45. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30851.
- Nuss D. Minimally invasive surgical repair of pectus excavatum. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;17(3):209-17. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.03.003.
- Nuss D, Kelly RE Jr. Indications and technique of Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Thorac Surg Clin. 2010 Nov;20(4):583-97. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2010.07.002.
- Dekonenko C, Dorman RM, Duran Y, Juang D, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, Oyetunji TA, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Millspaugh DL, St Peter SD. Postoperative pain control modalities for pectus excavatum repair: A prospective observational study of cryoablation compared to results of a randomized trial of epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia. J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Aug;55(8):1444-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
- Qi J, Du B, Gurnaney H, Lu P, Zuo Y. A prospective randomized observer-blinded study to assess postoperative analgesia provided by an ultrasound-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral block for children undergoing the Nuss procedure. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):208-13. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000071.
- Sertcakacilar G, Kose S. Bilateral PECS II Block is Associated with Decreased Opioid Consumption and Reduced Pain Scores for up to 24 hours After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (Nuss Procedure): A Retrospective Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Oct;36(10):3833-3840. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
- Abdel Shaheed C, McLachlan AJ, Maher CG. Rethinking "long term" opioid therapy. BMJ. 2019 Nov 29;367:l6691. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6691. No abstract available.
- Cadaval Gallardo C, Martinez J, Bellia-Munzon G, Nazar M, Sanjurjo D, Toselli L, Martinez-Ferro M. Thoracoscopic cryoanalgesia: A new strategy for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. Cir Pediatr. 2020 Jan 20;33(1):11-15. English, Spanish.
- Aiken TJ, Stahl CC, Lemaster D, Casias TW, Walker BJ, Nichol PF, Leys CM, Abbott DE, Brinkman AS. Intercostal nerve cryoablation is associated with lower hospital cost during minimally invasive Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Oct;56(10):1841-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
- Morikawa N, Laferriere N, Koo S, Johnson S, Woo R, Puapong D. Cryoanalgesia in Patients Undergoing Nuss Repair of Pectus Excavatum: Technique Modification and Early Results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Sep;28(9):1148-1151. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0665. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
- Harbaugh CM, Johnson KN, Kein CE, Jarboe MD, Hirschl RB, Geiger JD, Gadepalli SK. Comparing outcomes with thoracic epidural and intercostal nerve cryoablation after Nuss procedure. J Surg Res. 2018 Nov;231:217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
- Sun RC, Mehl SC, Anbarasu CR, Portuondo JI, Espinoza AF, Whitlock R, Mazziotti MV. Intercostal cryoablation during Nuss procedure: A large volume single surgeon's experience and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Dec;56(12):2229-2234. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
- Sujka J, Benedict LA, Fraser JD, Aguayo P, Millspaugh DL, St Peter SD. Outcomes Using Cryoablation for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Following Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1383-1386. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0111. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
- Daemen JHT, de Loos ER, Vissers YLJ, Bakens MJAM, Maessen JG, Hulsewe KWE. Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural for postoperative analgesia following pectus excavatum repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):486-498. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa151.
- Zobel MJ, Ewbank C, Mora R, Idowu O, Kim S, Padilla BE. The incidence of neuropathic pain after intercostal cryoablation during the Nuss procedure. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 Mar;36(3):317-324. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04602-1. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
- Janssen N, Daemen JHT, Franssen AJPM, van Polen EJ, van Roozendaal LM, Hulsewe KWE, Vissers Y, de Loos ER. Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural analgesia for minimal invasive Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial (ICE trial). BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 25;14(3):e081392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081392.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Bone Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Abnormalities
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Bone Diseases, Developmental
- Perceptual Disorders
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Agnosia
- Funnel Chest
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics
- Narcotics
- Delivery of Health Care
- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Organic Chemicals
- Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring
- Heterocyclic Compounds
- Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring
- Therapeutics
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Drug Administration Routes
- Drug Therapy
- Pharmacologic Actions
- Chemical Actions and Uses
- Therapeutic Uses
- Diet, Food, and Nutrition
- Physiological Phenomena
- Food and Beverages
- Alkaloids
- Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
- Polycyclic Compounds
- Anilides
- Amides
- Aniline Compounds
- Amines
- Piperidines
- Health Care Economics and Organizations
- Beverages
- Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings
- Plant Preparations
- Biological Products
- Complex Mixtures
- Morphinans
- Opiate Alkaloids
- Heterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-Ring
- Phenanthrenes
- Central Nervous System Agents
- Morphine Derivatives
- Health Planning
- Codeine
- Ablation Techniques
- Injections
- Health Services Research
- Fentanyl
- Injections, Spinal
- Bupivacaine
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Oxycodone
- Sufentanil
- Cryosurgery
- Tea
- Injections, Epidural
- Health Services Needs and Demand
Other Study ID Numbers
- Z2023005
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Funnel Chest
-
Dr. Caroline FortmannFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergCompletedCongenital Funnel Chest
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedFunnel Chest | Chest Wall DeformityGermany
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedFunnel Chest | Pectus Excavatum | Pectus Excavatum Deformity | Chest DeformitiesTurkey
-
Erik de LoosCompleted
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalRecruitingPectus Excavatum DeformityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalRecruitingPectus ExcavatumTurkey
-
Zuyderland Medisch CentrumUnknownPectus ExcavatumNetherlands
-
Baylor College of MedicineTerminatedPectus ExcavatumUnited States
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruiting
-
University of Sao PauloFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompleted
Clinical Trials on Intercostal nerve cryoablation
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRecruiting
-
Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain...Not yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalUnknownVideo Assisted Thoracoscopic SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedPostherpetic Neuralgia ( PHN ) | Intercostal Neuralgia | Thoracic Neuropathic PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Vancouver Island Health AuthorityActive, not recruiting
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesRecruitingPain, Postoperative | Rib Fracture MultipleUnited States
-
Erasme University HospitalNot yet recruitingVideo Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) | Intercostal Nerve BlockBelgium
-
NYU Langone HealthTerminatedProstate CancerUnited States
-
Medical College of WisconsinAtriCure, Inc.CompletedLung Diseases | Pain, PostoperativeUnited States