- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05731986
Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Effect on Blood Pressure in Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) (SCI)
Neuromodulation of Blood Pressure Using Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Individuals With an Acute Spinal Cord Injury - A Safety, Feasibility and Efficacy Study
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on blood pressure in individuals with an acute spinal cord injury (within 30 days of injury). Blood pressure instability, specifically orthostatic hypotension (a drop in blood pressure when moving lying flat on your back to an upright position), appears early after the injury and often significantly interferes with participation in the critical rehabilitation time period.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can optimal spinal stimulation increase blood pressure and resolve orthostatic symptoms (such as dizziness and nausea) when individuals undergo an orthostatic provocation (a sit-up test)? Optimal stimulation and sham stimulation (which is similar to a placebo treatment) will be compared.
- What are the various spinal sites and stimulation parameters that can be used to increase and stabilize blood pressure to the normal range of 110-120 mmHg?
Participants will undergo orthostatic tests (lying on a bed that starts out flat and then moved into an upright seated position by raising the head of bed by 90° and dropping the base of the bed by 90° from the knee) with optimal and sham stimulation, and their blood pressure measurements will be evaluated and compared.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Blood pressure (BP) control in persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) is often impaired, resulting in short and long-term health complications and a decline in quality of life. Cardiovascular (CV) dysfunction develops early after SCI and often continues a lifetime. Orthostatic hypotension (OH), a 20/10 mmHg decrease in systolic/diastolic BP when moving from a supine to an upright position, is especially prevalent in the early phase, and frequently accompanied by symptoms of dizziness, weakness, fatigue, and syncope. Affecting up to 75% of therapy treatments during inpatient rehabilitation, OH significantly interferes with participation during the critical rehab time-period, especially as length of stay in rehabilitation has substantially shortened in the past decades.
The compelling rationale for early identification and treatment of OH is met by several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, however, the majority have limited effect, and increase the risk of adverse drug effects due to polypharmacy. In recent years, epidural and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation has been explored with promising results as a potential treatment to CV dysfunction in SCI. To date, only individuals with a chronic SCI (>1 year) were included in these studies.
The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) on BP in individuals with an acute/sub-acute SCI (7-30 days after injury), during their inpatient rehabilitation. Optimal stimulation sites and parameters that increase and stabilize systolic BP (SBP) within the normotensive range (110-120 mmHg) during an orthostatic challenge will be sought. In this crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT), the effect of optimal CV stimulation and sham stimulation on BP and orthostatic symptoms will be assessed and compared.
The information gleaned from this work will allow design and implementation of scTS interventions in the early phase following an SCI, allowing full participation in inpatient rehabilitation programs, which are often hindered by the patients' autonomic dysfunction.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Leighann Martinez, BA
- Phone Number: (973)324-3557
- Email: lmartinez@kesslerfoundation.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Einat Engel-Haber, MD
- Email: ehaber@kesslerfoundation.org
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
- Recruiting
- Kessler Foundation
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Steven Kirshblum, MD
-
Contact:
- LeighAnn Martinez, BA
- Phone Number: 973-324-3557
- Email: lmartinez@kesslerfoundation.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Gail F Forrest, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Einat Engel-Haber, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Brittany Snider, DO
-
Contact:
- Einat Engel-Haber, MD
- Email: ehaber@kesslerfoundation.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 7-30 days after injury
- Injury level ≥T2 (thoracic level)
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A-C
Exhibits at least one of the following hypotensive symptoms:
- Baseline hypotension - resting supine or seated SBP < 90mmHg;
- SBP drop ≥ 20 mmHg within 5 minutes of assuming seated position;
- Symptoms of orthostasis with a drop of SBP (<90mmHg) from supine to sitting.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current illness (e.g., a recent diagnosis of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), a pressure injury that might interfere with the intervention, etc.) or infection
- Ventilator-dependent
- History of implanted brain/spine/nerve stimulators
- Cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator or intra-cardiac lines
- Significant coronary artery or cardiac conduction disease, a recent history of myocardial infarction
- Initiated on new cardiac medications within the past 5 days
- Insufficient mental capacity to understand and independently provide consent
- Pregnancy
- Cancer
- Deemed unsuitable by study physician
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Optimal stimulation (for a blood pressure response)
Stimulation will be applied during an orthostatic sit-up challenge, using the profile (stimulation site and parameters) that was chosen in the mapping sessions, for optimal modulation of systolic blood pressure.
|
Designed to invoke an orthostatic response. It begins with the participants lying supine on a specialized bed. The bed is then converted into a chair by raising the head of the bed by 90° and dropping the base of the bed by 90° from the knee. This position will be maintained for 15 minutes, while hemodynamic measures are continuously recorded. Some of these sessions will be accompanied by spinal stimulation.
Other Names:
Transcutaneous stimulation of the spinal cord.
Two days of mapping will be performed to determine sites for modulation of blood pressure.
During each day, with the participant in a supine or seated position, electrodes will be placed on the midline of one of the following spinous processes: C3/4, C5/6, C7/T1, T7/8, T11/12, L1/2 and S1/2.
Stimulation intensity will start at 5 mA and gradually increase by 5 mA increments up to 100 mA.
The frequency will be two or 30 Hz.
Based on the mapping sessions, profiles will be established to guide the selection of an optimal site location for blood pressure modulation (within the range of 110-120 mmHg).
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Sham stimulation will be applied during an orthostatic sit-up challenge.
Sham stimulation will be delivered at a predetermined spinal location.
Stimulation parameters, however, will be different from those chosen for the optimal stimulation, and sensation may be different as well.
|
Designed to invoke an orthostatic response. It begins with the participants lying supine on a specialized bed. The bed is then converted into a chair by raising the head of the bed by 90° and dropping the base of the bed by 90° from the knee. This position will be maintained for 15 minutes, while hemodynamic measures are continuously recorded. Some of these sessions will be accompanied by spinal stimulation.
Other Names:
Transcutaneous stimulation of the spinal cord.
Two days of mapping will be performed to determine sites for modulation of blood pressure.
During each day, with the participant in a supine or seated position, electrodes will be placed on the midline of one of the following spinous processes: C3/4, C5/6, C7/T1, T7/8, T11/12, L1/2 and S1/2.
Stimulation intensity will start at 5 mA and gradually increase by 5 mA increments up to 100 mA.
The frequency will be two or 30 Hz.
Based on the mapping sessions, a profile that does not elicit a significant blood pressure response, will be used for the sham stimulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Optimal stimulation sites
Time Frame: Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
|
Identify scTS spinal segments that restore systolic BP within the normotensive range (110-120 mmHg).
|
Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Optimal stimulation frequency
Time Frame: Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
|
Identify scTS frequency that restores systolic BP within the normotensive range (110-120 mmHg).
|
Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Systolic blood pressure measurements (mmHg) - Mean and SD of beat-to-beat BP
Time Frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
A comparison of systolic blood pressure with no stimulation, sham or optimal stimulation during an orthostatic challenge will be performed to assess the efficacy of stimulation.
|
Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Change in Orthostatic symptoms when stimulation is applied
Time Frame: Will be performed every 5 minutes during the orthostatic tests, average of 2 weeks
|
A questionnaire ranking the severity of orthostatic symptoms (dizziness, nausea), using a scale of 1-10 (10 being the most severe), will be conducted during an orthostatic test to assess the efficacy of stimulation and compare the effects of optimal and sham stimulation.
|
Will be performed every 5 minutes during the orthostatic tests, average of 2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain
Time Frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
Adverse effects will be recorded to assess the safety of stimulation.
A numerical scale of 0 to 10 (with 10 meaning the worst pain) will be used to monitor any pain symptoms associated with the stimulation
|
Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Skin integrity assessment
Time Frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
Adverse effects will be recorded to assess the safety of stimulation.
Skin integrity (skin irritation or breakdown caused by electrodes, wires or adhesive tape) will be assessed on a daily basis
|
Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Feasibility of applying scTS in inpatient settings - compliance
Time Frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
The ratio of total number of completed sessions divided by the number of sessions initially planned.
|
Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Feasibility of applying scTS in inpatient settings - session duration
Time Frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
The length of time of each session and total length will be recorded.
|
Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Feasibility of applying scTS in inpatient settings - effect on therapy
Time Frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
Total therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation will be recorded to ensure there is no interruption to the normal therapy schedule.
|
Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Electromyography (EMG) of leg muscles - muscle activation (analysis of mean and peak amplitudes)
Time Frame: Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
|
Analysis of leg-muscle EMG to identify configurations that modulate BP without eliciting motor activity, ensuring that BP response was not due to lower limb muscle contraction
|
Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Additional hemodynamic measure - diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: throughout the trial, average of 2 weeks
|
These measures will be collected on a daily basis throughout the trial
|
throughout the trial, average of 2 weeks
|
|
Additional hemodynamic measure - heart rate
Time Frame: throughout the trial, average of 2 weeks
|
These measures will be collected on a daily basis throughout the trial
|
throughout the trial, average of 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gail F Forrest, Phd, Kessler Foundation
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Vascular Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Primary Dysautonomias
- Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
- Orthostatic Intolerance
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Hypotension
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Hypotension, Orthostatic
- Nervous System Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Immunologic Factors
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- Glycoprotein, Klebsiella pneumoniae
Other Study ID Numbers
- CSCR23FEL002 (Other Grant/Funding Number: New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases
-
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Surgery | Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)United Kingdom
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingCardiovascular | Cardiovascular Health | Cardiovascular (CV) Risk | Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Fu Jen Catholic UniversityRecruitingCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular SurgeryTaiwan
-
Medical College of WisconsinNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Cardiovascular HealthUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompleted
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoIRCCS San Raffaele; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and other collaboratorsRecruitingCardiovascular Risk | Genetic Cardiovascular RiskItaly
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Women's College HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Brigham... and other collaboratorsUnknownCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESCanada, United States
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephTerminatedCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESFrance
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases (CVD)United States
Clinical Trials on Orthostatic challenge
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedPostural Orthostatic Tachycardia SyndromeUnited States
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingThe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityNot yet recruitingOrthostatic HypotensionChina
-
University of ManitobaHealth Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Natural Sciences and Engineering...RecruitingCerebral Autoregulation MappingCanada
-
Hospital Moinhos de VentoHospital Ernesto DornellesTerminated
-
Lund UniversityFood for Health Science Centre, Lund UniversityCompleted
-
McMaster UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Joslin Diabetes CenterImmusanT, Inc.CompletedType 1 Diabetes | Celiac DiseaseUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompletedCeliac Disease | Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity
-
Emory UniversityCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted