Periocular Rejuvenation by Topical Hyaluronic Acid Nano Particles

January 29, 2025 updated by: Shimaa Ismail Abdelhamid, Alexandria University

Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Novel Drug-free Hyaluronic Acid Topical Nano-carrier in Periocular Rejuvenation

In this study, The investigators aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles as a novel nanodermatological tool in periocular rejuvenation as a replacement approach of invasive dermal filler injections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tear trough deformity is a main concern of many people (males or females) with age range of 21 to 65 years old or older. Such condition is characterized by a sunken appearance of the eye that results in an aged and dissipated appearance to the eye.Treatment modalities range from camouflage make up, laser resurfacing, platelet-rich plasma therapy, carboxy therapy, mesotherapy, volume augmentation with injectable hyaluronic acid fillers and fat, as well as surgical procedures such as blepharoplasty. Consequently, safe, effective and less invasive treatment options of the tear trough have remained a challenge.

The study will include 30 adult patients (male or female) suffering tear trough deformity.

They will be selected from Dermatology Outpatient Clinic of Alexandria Main University Hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Elazarita
      • Alexandria, Elazarita, Egypt, 21500
        • Shaimaa Ismail Omar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Is a healthy male or female between 21 and 65 years old
  2. Is voluntarily willing to consent to participate in the study
  3. Is willing to comply with all requirements of the study including being photographed, follow post treatment care instructions, to attend all treatment, and follow up visits
  4. Willingness to waive rights to use of still photos of themselves for research, marketing, or promotional reasons, including on the internet and on social media outlets.
  5. Willingness to refrain from other surgical, laser, or injectable treatments in the periorbital region during the entire duration of the study.
  6. Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hyaluronic acid nanoparticles (2%)
patients with tear trough will receive hyaluronic acid nano-gel (2%) 2 applications / day (morning and evening) on tear troughs for 1 month
Hyaluronic acid nanoparticles (2%)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
patients with tear trough will receive placebo conventional gel having the same color, form and packaging for 1 month
conventional gel having the same color, form and packaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in treatment of tear trough
Time Frame: 1 month
To evaluate the efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in in treatment of tear trough using Sadick et al scale at baseline and after one month treatment. the score will range from 1-14, in which the higher the score, the worse the outcome
1 month
Assessment of improvement of tear trough by topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Physician assessment will be done at the one-month follow up visit through blinded evaluator-assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Score. the score will range from 1-5, in which score 1 is associated with best results and score 5 with worst results.
up to 4 weeks
Patient satisfaction of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in treatment of tear trough
Time Frame: 1 month
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a visual analogue scale which is ranged from 0-3, 0 is associated with least satisfaction and 3 with the best satisfaction.
1 month
Incidence of side effects of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles around eyes
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Incidence of side effects will be evaluated at all visits by reporting any adverse events such as erythema, dryness, itching, edema or hyperpigmentation.
up to 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in treatment of dark circles
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
To evaluate the efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in treatment of of dark circles according to the intenisty of pigmentaion (mild, moderate or intense)
up to 4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in treatment of periocular wrinkles
Time Frame: 1 month
To evaluate the efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid nanoparticles in treatment of wrinkles according to Glogau wrinkles scale at baseline and after one month treatment. it ranges from 1-4. one mean youngest and 4 means oldest
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yosra S.R Elnaggar, MD, Alexandria University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1. Diab HM, Elhosseiny R, Bedair NI, Khorkhed AH. Efficacy and safety of plasma gel versus platelet-rich plasma in periorbital rejuvenation: a comparative split-face clinical and Antera 3D camera study. Archives of dermatological research. 2021. 2. Sharad J. Dermal Fillers for the Treatment of Tear Trough Deformity: A Review of Anatomy, Treatment Techniques, and their Outcomes. Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. 2012;5(4):229-38. 3. Viana GA, Osaki MH, Cariello AJ, Damasceno RW, Osaki TH. Treatment of the tear trough deformity with hyaluronic acid. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2011;31(2):225-31. 4. Hirmand H. Anatomy and nonsurgical correction of the tear trough deformity. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2010;125(2):699-708. 5. Shah-Desai S, Joganathan V. Novel technique of non-surgical rejuvenation of infraorbital dark circles. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2021;20(4):1214-20. 6. Trinh LN, Grond SE, Gupta A. Dermal Fillers for Tear Trough Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review. Facial plastic surgery : FPS. 2021. 7. Lubart R, Yariv I, Fixler D, Lipovsky A. Topical Hyaluronic Acid Facial Cream with New Micronized Molecule Technology Effectively Penetrates and Improves Facial Skin Quality: Results from In-vitro, Ex-vivo, and In-vivo (Open-label) Studies. The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology. 2019;12(10):39-44. 8. Chiari-Andréo BG, Almeida-Cincotto MGJd, Oshiro JA, Taniguchi CYY, Chiavacci LA, Isaac VLB. Chapter 5 - Nanoparticles for cosmetic use and its application. In: Grumezescu AM, editor. Nanoparticles in Pharmacotherapy: William Andrew Publishing; 2019.113-46.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Because we will publish the study in a journal

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on Hyaluronic acid NanoGel

Subscribe