Multicentric Comparative Prospective Study of the Benefits and Risks of Biopsy Prostate Using Transrectal or Transperineal Procedure for the Prostate Cancer Diagnostic (BIOPROSTABORD)

April 20, 2026 updated by: Elsan

Multicentric Comparative Prospective Study of the Benefits and Risks of Biopsy Prostate Using Transrectal or Transperineal Procedure for the Prostate Cancer Diagnostic.

The performance of prostatic biopsies is an essential element to confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer and to specify the characteristics of the tumor in terms of stage and grade.

The first route of prostatic biopsies is mainly transrectal with passage of a needle introduced into the guide fixed on the endorectal ultrasound probe. There is another possible access route, transperineal, with prostatic puncture by a needle introduced transcutaneously, guided by an endorectal ultrasound image. The first transperineal route would offer the first benefit for the patient, to reduce the infectious risk inherent in the endorectal way. It would also reduce the risk of rectal bleeding.

In addition, the transperineal pathway appears to be able to improve the detection threshold of prostatic tumours located on the anterior part of the gland due to the angle of penetration of the needle and its more anterior positioning relative to the prostate.

There is currently no randomized comparison study of the transperineal versus transrectal procedure on infectious risk. The aim of the project is to enable this comparative study, within our institution where experienced urologist surgeons practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Soyaux, France, 16800
        • Centre Clinical
    • France
      • Bordeaux, France, France, 33074
        • Clinique St Augustin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with suspected prostate cancer with at least one of the following criteria met :

    1. MRI Staging: T2 or T3a,
    2. MRI Grading: Pirads greater than or equal to 3
    3. MRI tumor volume greater than or equal to 0.5 cm3

    e.Patient without tumor lesion detected by prostate MRI less than 3 months old with PSA > 4 ng/ml, or an observed suspicious induration to the rectal exam

  • Voluntarily signed and dated written informed consents prior to any study specific procedure,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other medical conditions may interfere with the conduct of the study and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study,
  • Individuals deprived of liberty or placed under legal guardianship,
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the study protocol for any reason.
  • Patients without a health insurance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Transrectal biopsy using KOELIS fusion system
Transrectal procedure will be performed with the patient in the left lateral position with a completely free-hand technique utilising the KOELIS fusion system.
Biopsies will be performed under local anaesthesia. In all patients with a suspicious lesion (PIRADSv2.1 3-5) noted on the mp-MRI, the software-based image fusion biopsies will be obtained collecting 3 to 5 cores per target area according to its volume, 10-12 systematic cores of the remaining areas of the prostate will be collected from sectors specified in the PIRADSv2.1 prostate map.
Other: Transperineal biopsy using KOELIS perine grid
Transperineal biopsy will be performed in the lithotomy position. KOELIS "Perine Grid" needle guidance device and "Steady Pro" free-hand probe arm will be utilised (free-hand assisted technique).
Biopsies will be performed under local anaesthesia. In all patients with a suspicious lesion (PIRADSv2.1 3-5) noted on the mp-MRI, the software-based image fusion biopsies will be obtained collecting 3 to 5 cores per target area according to its volume, 10-12 systematic cores of the remaining areas of the prostate will be collected from sectors specified in the PIRADSv2.1 prostate map.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the rate of occurrence of biopsy-induced infection in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days after intervention

Biopsy-induced infection are defined as :

  • Positive post-biopsy urinary test result
  • Clinical infection syndrome (T>37.5°C fever)
  • Signs of urogenital infection (cystitis/prostatitis/orchi-epididymitis)
  • Hospitalization for hyperpyrexia
  • Septic shock
30 days after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the rate of rectal bleeding in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days after intervention
30 days after intervention
Comparison of the rate of urethral bleeding (hematuria and urethrorrhagia) in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days after intervention
30 days after intervention
Comparison of the percentage of negative biopsies in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days after intervention
30 days after intervention
Comparison of the percentage of positive biopsies on on anterior areas in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days after intervention
30 days after intervention
Comparison of the Percentage of underestimation of the stage of tumor development in both groups
Time Frame: 3 months after intervention
Confrontation with the MRI result and the resected specimen of the radical prostatectomy
3 months after intervention
Assess the pain (tolerance) felt by the patient according to the biopsy method used
Time Frame: 1 day
EVA pain scale at J0
1 day
Comparison of the Room occupancy time in both groups
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Comparison of the Procedure Time in both groups
Time Frame: 1 day
Procedure time = Endorectal Ultrasound Probe Introduction Time - Probe Removal Time
1 day
Comparison of the Average Length of Stay in both groups
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients With Suspected Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Biopsy

Subscribe