- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05802745
P0.1 and Extubation Failure in Critically Ill Patients
Airway Occlusion Pressure (P0.1) to Predict Extubation Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study
Weaning and extubation are essential steps for the management of critically ill patients when mechanical ventilation (MV) is no longer required. Extubation failure (EF) occurs in approximately 10-30% (1,2) of all patients meeting the readiness criteria and have tolerated a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). EF is associated with prolonged MV, as well as increased morbidity and mortality (2). Therefore, the early identification of critically ill patients who are likely to experience EF is vital for improved outcomes.
EF can result from different factors (respiratory, metabolic, neuromuscular), particularly cardiac factor, and can be caused by the inability of the respiratory muscle pump to tolerate increases in the cardiac and respiratory load (1,3).
Respiratory drive represents the intensity of the neural stimulus to breathe. In mechanically ventilated patients, it can be abnormally low (i.e., suppressed or insufficient) or abnormally high (i.e., excessive), and thus result in excessively low or high inspiratory effort, leading to potential injury to the respiratory muscles (i.e., myotrauma) (4,5) or to the lungs. A high incidence of abnormal drive (low or high) may explain the high incidence of diaphragm dysfunction at time of separation from mechanical ventilation (6).
Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) is the drop in airway pressure (Paw) 100 milliseconds after the onset of inspiration during an end-expiratory occlusion of the airway (7). P0.1 measurement is not perceived by the patient and does not influence respiratory pattern. It is, in theory, a reliable measure of respiratory drive because the brevity of the occlusion explains that it is not affected by patient's response to the occlusion and it is independent of respiratory mechanics (8). P0.1 has also been correlated with inspiratory effort (9, 10) and it has been shown that in patients under assisted mechanical ventilation P0.1 might be able to detect potentially excessive inspiratory effort (11).
P0.1 is a non-invasive measure and clinically available at bedside since currently nearly all modern ventilators provide a means of measuring it. Originally, a high P0.1 during a spontaneous breathing trial was associated with failure, suggesting that a high respiratory drive could predict weaning failure. However, only a few and old clinical studies investigated the association between P0.1 and extubation failure (EF) and were not conclusive (12,13). We hypothesized that patients with EF would have increased P0.1 values during spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Therefore, the aims of our study will be to (1) to evaluate the ability of changes in P0.1 (Delta-P0.1) during SBT to predict EF and (2) to assess if Delta-P0.1 is an independent predictor of EF.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Weaning protocol SBTs will be performed in semirecumbent patients on Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) mode with inspiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O as per ICU protocol. Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) will be adjusted for the achievement of an arterial oxygen saturation value > 90%, as measured by pulse oximetry. The SBT duration will be 30 minutes as per ICU protocol. The criteria that will be used for poor SBT tolerance are: (1) diaphoresis; (2) use of accessory respiratory muscles; (3) RR > 35/min; (4) oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry < 90% with FiO2 ≥ 50%; (5) HR > 140/min or greater than a 20% increase from baseline; (6) Systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or <90 mmHg; (7) development of cardiac arrhythmias; and/or low level of consciousness.
The decision to stop SBT will be made by the physicians. Patients who will fail SBT will be shifted to their previous ventilator mode and not be enrolled in the study.
Patients who will complete the SBT will be extubated and followed-up for 72 hours. The medical team (physician, nurse, and respiratory therapist) involved in the extubation decision will be blinded to the P0.1 results. EF will be diagnosed if the patient is extubated but required reintubation within the following 72 hours. Criteria for acute respiratory failure after extubation are the development of at least one of the following: (a) respiratory acidosis with pH < 7.32 and arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2) > 45 mmHg; (b) arterial oxygen saturation < 90% with FiO2 > 0.5; (c) RR > 35/min; (d) clinical signs of respiratory fatigue.
The management of post-extubation respiratory failure will not be protocolized and will be left to the physician's discretion.
Ventilatory, including P0.1 and hemodynamic parameters, including EtCO2 will be recorded as the average of at least three measurements immediately before SBT, during SBT, and at 30 minutes after SBT initiation. Arterial and central venous blood gas (if central line present) will be measured immediately before SBT and at 30 minutes after SBT initiation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amiens, France
- Amiens University Hospital
-
Dijon, France
- Dijon University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients aged 18 years or older who received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours and satisfied the weaning criteria will be eligible for enrollment.
The readiness-to-wean criteria that will be employed are: (1) the resolution or improvement of the underlying cause of respiratory failure for which the patient was intubated; (2) hemodynamic stability, defined as heart rate (HR) < 140/min and systolic blood pressure between 90 and 160 mmHg with no or minimal doses of vasopressors; (3) stable respiratory status, defined as oxygen saturation > 90% with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤ 0.5 and positive end expiratory-pressure (PEEP) ≤8 cmH2O, respiratory rate (RR) ≤ 35/min, spontaneous tidal volume (Vt) > 5 mL/kg, and no significant respiratory acidosis; (4) adequate mental status, and (5) adequate cough.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of tracheostomy
- Do-not-reintubate orders
- pregnancy
- Absence of informed consent
- Spontaneous breathing trial failure.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Extubation failure
Patients who will require to be re-intubated within 72 hours after extubation.
|
Patients requiring re-intubation for acute respiratory failure.
|
|
Extubation success
Patients who will not require reintubation within 72 hours of extubation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Extubation failure
Time Frame: Within 72 hours after extubation.
|
to evaluate the ability of changes in P01 (Delta-P0.1)
during SBT to predict extubation failure after 72 hours of extubation.
|
Within 72 hours after extubation.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delta-P01 as independent factor of extubation failure
Time Frame: Within 72 hours after extubation.
|
To assess if Delta- P0.1 during SBT is an independent predictor of extubation failure
|
Within 72 hours after extubation.
|
|
Extubation failure
Time Frame: 7 days after extubation
|
Association between Delta-P0.1 and extubation failure after 7 days of extubation
|
7 days after extubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jihad Mallat, MD, PhD, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, Pearl R, Silverman H, Stanchina M, Vieillard-Baron A, Welte T. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00010206.
- Goligher EC, Dres M, Fan E, Rubenfeld GD, Scales DC, Herridge MS, Vorona S, Sklar MC, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Murray A, Brace D, Urrea C, Reid WD, Tomlinson G, Slutsky AS, Kavanagh BP, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND. Mechanical Ventilation-induced Diaphragm Atrophy Strongly Impacts Clinical Outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 15;197(2):204-213. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0536OC.
- MacIntyre N. Discontinuing mechanical ventilatory support. Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):1049-56. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2862.
- Dres M, Dube BP, Mayaux J, Delemazure J, Reuter D, Brochard L, Similowski T, Demoule A. Coexistence and Impact of Limb Muscle and Diaphragm Weakness at Time of Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):57-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0367OC.
- Thille AW, Richard JC, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 15;187(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1523CI.
- Goligher EC, Brochard LJ, Reid WD, Fan E, Saarela O, Slutsky AS, Kavanagh BP, Rubenfeld GD, Ferguson ND. Diaphragmatic myotrauma: a mediator of prolonged ventilation and poor patient outcomes in acute respiratory failure. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jan;7(1):90-98. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30366-7. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
- Telias I, Damiani F, Brochard L. The airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) to monitor respiratory drive during mechanical ventilation: increasing awareness of a not-so-new problem. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1532-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5045-8. Epub 2018 Jan 19. No abstract available.
- Whitelaw WA, Derenne JP, Milic-Emili J. Occlusion pressure as a measure of respiratory center output in conscious man. Respir Physiol. 1975 Mar;23(2):181-99. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(75)90059-6.
- Alberti A, Gallo F, Fongaro A, Valenti S, Rossi A. P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1995 Jul;21(7):547-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01700158.
- Mancebo J, Albaladejo P, Touchard D, Bak E, Subirana M, Lemaire F, Harf A, Brochard L. Airway occlusion pressure to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with dynamic hyperinflation. Anesthesiology. 2000 Jul;93(1):81-90. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00016.
- Rittayamai N, Beloncle F, Goligher EC, Chen L, Mancebo J, Richard JM, Brochard L. Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 6;7(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z.
- Sassoon CS, Te TT, Mahutte CK, Light RW. Airway occlusion pressure. An important indicator for successful weaning in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Jan;135(1):107-13. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.1.107.
- Fernandez R, Raurich JM, Mut T, Blanco J, Santos A, Villagra A. Extubation failure: diagnostic value of occlusion pressure (P0.1) and P0.1-derived parameters. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):234-240. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2070-y. Epub 2003 Nov 8.
- Mallat J, Storme N, Askalany M, Helal M, Din MU, Samanta S, Samanta S, Hamed F, Edke U, Carvalho T, De Oliveira B, Elkambergy H, Dibu J, Bayrlee A, Siddique H, Haque R, Aljaberi N, Shoshan S, Munde D, Guilbart M, Dhundi U, Alhajri N, Babar M, Belfegas M, Mandi A, Khan U, Ahmed I, Omer T, Varghese Y, Metzelard M, Charles A, Kacherintavida M, Beyls C, Aljasmi M, Abduljawad B, Ismail K, Mahjoub Y, Abou Arab O. The Weaning Index during Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Predicting Extubation Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Bicentric Prospective Study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2026 Mar 20:101819. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2026.101819. Online ahead of print.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-2023-014
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Critically Ill
-
Third Military Medical UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Niveus Medical, Inc.Terminated
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
China Medical University HospitalRecruitingCritically Ill PatientsTaiwan
-
Hospital Sao DomingosCompletedCritically Ill PatientsBrazil
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknownCritically-ill PatientsEgypt
-
Hôpital Edouard HerriotCompletedCritically Ill PatientsFrance
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzUnknown
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.CompletedCritically Ill PatientsTaiwan
-
St. Antonius HospitalCompletedCritically Ill Patients
Clinical Trials on Reintubation
-
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUnknownMyasthenia GravisChina