SCED Myokines and Cognition in SCI

December 1, 2023 updated by: Wouter Vints, Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology

Myokines and Cognitive Aging in People With Spinal Cord Injury: a Single Case Experimental Design Study

Rationale: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from accelerated cognitive aging. In able-bodied individuals, a vast amount of studies have shown that exercise interventions can improve cognitive function. Myokines (i.e. factors released into the blood stream from muscle cells) are considered one of the mediators of this beneficial effect. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), used to replace or support muscle training in disabled individuals with poor exercise possibilities, was shown to elicit a large release of myokines (in some studies larger than following voluntary exercise). However, so far, the effects of NMES on cognitive function have never been studied before. In fact, only one study has previously investigated the effect of exercise on cognitive function in persons with SCI.

Objective: The primary aim is to assess to what extent a 12 week intervention with NMES to the quadriceps muscles of people with SCI can change their performance on a set of cognitive tests. Secondarily, the investigators will measure to what extent NMES to the quadriceps muscles of people with SCI induces changes in blood levels of the myokine brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is considered a potential mediator of the exercise-cognition effect, facilitating neuroplastic processes.

Study design: A single case experimental design (SCED) with sequential multiple baseline time series and a single-armed prospective study design, with a random duration of the baseline phase ranging from 3 to 6 weeks, an intervention phase of 12 weeks, and a 12 week period without measurements, followed by a follow-up phase of 3 weeks; in addition to a single-armed prospective study design.

Study population: Individuals (n = 15) aged 18 years and older with a chronic SCI (>1y post-injury) and with visible or palpable contraction of the quadriceps muscles upon NMES will be recruited at the rehabilitation centre of Adelante in Hoensbroek, the Netherlands.

Intervention: The study participants will receive 30min of NMES using surface electrodes on the quadriceps muscles three times per week for a total duration of 12 weeks.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is cognitive function changes which will be measured using a secured smartphone application (e.g. m-Path). Secondary outcome measures are changes in the blood myokine levels of BDNF and changes in cognitive outcome scores on an verbal cognitive test battery.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons with spinal cord injury
  • Completeness of injury: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B or C
  • Level of injury: L2 or higher
  • At least 18 years old
  • Chronic stage (> 1 year) since injury
  • No previous surgery to the quadriceps muscles
  • Intact hand function
  • Able to use apps on smartphone (i.e. participants should have their own smartphone and should not have disabilities that impair them to operate it independently)
  • Able to follow the instructions of placing the surface electrodes of the NMES device correctly or to have someone else put the electrodes for them
  • Dutch as a native language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malignant processes, or history of undergoing chemotherapy, or history of radiotherapy to the head
  • No visible or palpable contraction of the quadriceps muscle upon electrical stimulation
  • Intolerance to electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle
  • Recent or current participation in an electrical stimulation-induced exercise or therapy program in which regular electrical stimulation was given (up to 6 months prior to study inclusion)
  • Known neurodegenerative disorder, such as Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease
  • Known psychiatric disorder, such as major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder
  • Current pressure ulcer
  • History of severe autonomic dysreflexia
  • Metal implants in the electrical stimulation area
  • Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) device
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All participants
Each participant will undergo the same procedures and intervention, consisting of a baseline phase, intervention phase and follow-up phase. The length of the baseline phase will be randomized 3, 4, 5 or 6 weeks.
NMES will consist of a 12 week electrical stimulation program, three times a week. Electrical stimulation will be done on the quadriceps muscles of both legs simultaneously. For each leg, one electrode is placed on the proximal side and one on the distal side of the quadriceps muscle. Electrical stimulation sessions will take 30min, at a stimulation frequency of 50Hz, an intensity where we can at least see a visible or palpable contraction with a maximum intensity of 100mA (we will choose the highest intensity that is easily supported by the participant without inducing discomfort) and a pulse width of 400μs. The activation within the activation-rest cycle consists of a 1s ramp-up, 7s full activation and 1s ramp-down, followed by 18s rest. Every 4 weeks the rest period will be diminished with 3s until a total of 9s.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in executive function
Time Frame: measured a total of 54-63 times in 30-33 weeks time
response time (in ms) on the momentary digital symbol substitution task
measured a total of 54-63 times in 30-33 weeks time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurocognitive test battery, change in cognitive scores
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
A neurocognitive test battery will be used to assess cognitive changes on various cognitive domains over time
before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor will be measured in blood of the participants
before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Self-perceived cognitive function
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
measured using the cognitive failures index (CFI), ranging from 0-100, with a higher score indicating more subjective cognitive problems
before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Pain score
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
measured using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), ranging from 0-78, with a higher score indicating higher subjective pain level
before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Fatigue
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), ranging from 1-7, with a higher score indicating more fatigue/higher impact of fatigue on daily activities
before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Participation in daily life activities
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
measured using the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P), ranging from 0-100, with a higher score indicating larger participation in daily life activities
before and after the 12 week intervention and after a 12 week follow-up
Spasticity
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention
measured using the Perceived Resistance to Passive Movement (PRPM) test at all four limbs.
before and after the 12 week intervention
Electrically-evoked quadriceps strength
Time Frame: before and after the 12 week intervention
measured using the MicroFET2 dynamometer
before and after the 12 week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charlotte van Laake, MD, PhD, Center of Exertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Adelante Zorggroep

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All information will be coded and kept behind locked doors.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular electrical stimulation

3
Subscribe