Digitalized Surveillance Management for Liver Cancer Risk Population in Improving Eearly Diagnosis Efficancy in Chinese Population (dSEARCH) (dSEARCH)

May 13, 2023 updated by: Qing XIe, Ruijin Hospital

Exploration of A Holistic Management Procedure for Liver Cancer Surveillance in Improving Liver Cancer's Early Diagnosis Efficacy in Chinese Population: Single-Center, Prospective, Observational Real-world Study in EASTERN China

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether the standardized liver cancer risk stratification management can effectively improve the early diagnosis rate of liver cancer in the targeted risk population in China.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Infectious Diseases , Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qing Xie, MD, PhD.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study mainly includes the following risk groups of liver cancer: patients with chronic hepatitis B, patients with hepatitis C, patients with liver cirrhosis, patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with a liver fibrosis index F3 or above, MAFLD patients combined with abnormal glucose metabolism, and people with a family history of liver cancer in their first-degree biological relatives.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Voluntary participation in the clinical study; fully informed about the study and signed informed consent, willing to follow and capable of completing all trial procedures[17]
  2. Age: 18 to 75 years old (including the cut-offs)
  3. Subjects must meet at least one of the following criteria for enrollment.

    1. Patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B in hospital or out of hospital: persistent positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for 6 months or more
    2. Patients diagnosed with hepatitis C in hospital or out of hospital
    3. Patients diagnosed with cirrhosis in hospital or out of hospital who meet at least one of the following criteria.

      1. Liver biopsy showing cirrhosis (Ishak score ≥5 or Metavir score = 4);
      2. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using FibroScan® (Echosens™, Paris, France) ≥12.0 kPa when TB was normal and ALT ≤ 40 IU/mL, or LSM ≥ 17.0 kPa when TB was normal and ALT < 200 IU/mL;
      3. Abdominal imaging results showing characteristic of cirrhosis (results showing coarse liver echotexture or nodular, parenchymal, or morphological abnormalities and signs of gastroesophageal varices);
      4. APRI ≥ 2.0;
      5. FIB-4 ≥ 3.25
    4. Patients diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in hospital or out of hospital who have a liver fibrosis score of F3 or higher according to transient elastography, i.e., FibroScan® Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) ≥ 10 kPa or the corresponding FibroTouch® measurement threshold[18].

      • MAFLD diagnosis requires diagnosis of >5% fat accumulation in liver through either FibroScan® CAP measurements, or similar parameter, or liver biopsy, and in combination with one of the following three conditions: overweight/obesity (BMI >23 kg/m2), type 2 diabetes, or metabolic dysfunction.
    5. Patients diagnosed with MAFLD combined with abnormal glucose metabolism[19]

      • Abnormal glucose metabolism is defined as type 2 diabetes, or prediabetes, i.e. fasting blood glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/L, or 2h postprandial blood glucose 7.8-11.0 mmol/L, or glycated hemoglobin 5.7%-6.4%
    6. Subjects with a family history of liver cancer in their first-degree biological relatives.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

  1. Age <18 years or >75 years
  2. Patients who have been diagnosed with liver cancer before enrollment
  3. Patients with severe mental illness or cognitive impairment
  4. Patients who are pregnant or lactating, or preparing to become pregnant
  5. Patients who have participated in other clinical trials or are participating in other clinical trials within 3 months prior to initiation of study treatment
  6. According to the doctor's judgment, the possibility of the subject being included is low (including inability to understand the project requirements , poor compliance, infirmity, inability to ensure that the protocol can be implemented as required, etc.), or the doctor determines that the subject has any other factors that are not suitable for this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with very high risk for HCC according local guideline
Follow up every 3 months for liver cancer surveillance, including but not limited to serum AFP test and ultrasound exam
Patients with high risk for HCC according local guideline
Follow up every 3 months for liver cancer surveillance, including but not limited to serum AFP test and ultrasound exam
Patients with medium risk for HCC according local guideline
Follow up every 6 months for liver cancer surveillance, including but not limited to serum AFP test and ultrasound exam
Patients with low risk for HCC according local guideline
Follow up annually for liver cancer surveillance, including but not limited to serum AFP test and ultrasound exam

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early diagnosis rate of HCC patients
Time Frame: Follow up up to three years for HCC occurance.
The proportion of patients who are first diagnosed with HCC at early stage to all the patients diagnosed as liver cancer in the study, from the start of the study to the completion of follow-up. Early diagnosis is defined as the patient with stage CNLC Ia, Ib and IIa.
Follow up up to three years for HCC occurance.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects with regular follow-up
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started

Regular follow-up is defined as the average difference between the actual treatment time and the theoretical treatment time equal or less than 1/3

  • Actual visit interval: actual visit date - previous visit date ② Theoretical visit interval: theoretical visit date (the date that physician advise to return to hospital for visit) - previous visit date ③ Follow-up compliance = (②-①)/② ④ Patient with regular follow-up is defined as the patient whose mean follow-up compliance is equal to, or less than 1/3

    • The compliance of the study is defined as the proportion of subjects with regular follow-up to all subjects in the study.
Four years collectively after the study started
The distribution of risk stratification of liver cancer in subjects at initial screening
Time Frame: Initial screening after enrollment
The proportion of very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk subjects to the whole subject population
Initial screening after enrollment
The distribution of risk stratification of liver cancer in subjects at the last follow-up visit or at the time of diagnosis of liver cancer
Time Frame: Last follow-up visit or at the time of diagnosis of liver cancer up to three years of follow-up
The proportion of very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk subjects to the whole subject population
Last follow-up visit or at the time of diagnosis of liver cancer up to three years of follow-up
Pooled 3-year cumulative incidence of liver cancer
Time Frame: Follow up up to 3 years
Follow up up to 3 years
The early diagnosis rate of liver cancer in each subject category according to the risk stratification at initial screening
Time Frame: Initial screening after enrollment
The early diagnosis rate of liver cancer of subjects with very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk at initial screening, respectively
Initial screening after enrollment
The 3-year cumulative incidence of liver cancer in each subject category according to the risk stratification at the time of initial diagnosis
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started
The 3-year cumulative incidence of liver cancer for subjects with very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk, respectively
Four years collectively after the study started

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients first diagnosed with liver cancer and the annual incidence rate
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started
Four years collectively after the study started
The number of patients first diagnosed with liver cancer and the annual incidence rate within each risk category
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started
Four years collectively after the study started
The distribution of the CNLC staging of patients diagnosed as liver cancer first from the start of the study to the completion of follow-up
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started
Four years collectively after the study started
The 3-year cumulative incidence of liver cancer in each disease subgroup
Time Frame: Follow up up to 3 years
The disease types include but are not limited to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cirrhosis, MAFLD
Follow up up to 3 years
Early diagnosis rate of HCC in each disease subgroup
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started
The disease types include but are not limited to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cirrhosis, MAFLD; early diagnosis of HCC is defined as the patient with stage CNLC Ia, Ib and IIa
Four years collectively after the study started
The compliance rate of each risk group defined at the initial risk stratification
Time Frame: Four years collectively after the study started
The compliance rates for subjects with very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk; the compliance rate is defined the same as above
Four years collectively after the study started

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Clinical Trials on Liver cancer surveillance every 3 months

Subscribe