The Arch Watch Study: An Integrated Evaluation of Hemodynamics in Infants With Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta

August 19, 2024 updated by: John Kheir, Boston Children's Hospital

The Arch Watch Study: An Integrated Evaluation of Hemodynamics During Monitoring of Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Infants With Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta

Unrecognized coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a life-threatening component of congenital heart disease (CHD) in which narrowing of the aorta causes obstructed blood flow to the lower half of the body; it can occur in isolation or in combination with other defects. CoA is the type of CHD most likely to be missed by current newborn screening. An evolving coarctation (during closure of the ductus arteriosus) can be challenging to diagnose until often devastating end-organ injury manifests, even in the ICU setting. This study will evaluate currently used tools, such as four extremity blood pressures and pulse oximetry, and the investigators will test new tools - resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) and photoplethysmography analysis- to assess the adequacy of oxygen delivery in newborns who are at risk for aortic arch obstruction. The investigators hypothesize that combining an assessment of commonly used non-invasive monitoring tools, new components of these traditional tools, and RRS, will have improved sensitivity in detecting critical impairments to tissue oxygen delivery in newborns with suspected critical aortic arch obstruction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a potentially life-threatening form of congenital heart disease (CHD) in which an anatomic narrowing of the aortic arch may cause critical aortic arch obstruction (AAO) following closure of the ductus arteriosus (DA). CoA accounts for 6-8% of all CHD and occurs in about 1 in every 1800 babies born in the United States each year. Despite this prevalence, CoA frequently eludes detection on both prenatal imaging and CHD screening. If undiagnosed, infants may present with catastrophic shock, often leading to mortality or severe morbidities. In many cases, the anatomic appearance of the aortic arch in the fetal or early postnatal period raises suspicion for AAO that can only be confirmed by allowing the DA to become restrictive and closely monitoring for hemodynamic changes. However, the process of monitoring hemodynamics during ductal closure (MHDC, i.e. the 'arch watch') is variable across institutions and can be insensitive to critical deficiencies in oxygen delivery in the setting of decreased blood flow, even in subspecialized ICU environments. Current approaches to monitoring hemodynamic changes in neonates with possible AAO revolve around non-invasive measurements of oxygen saturation (i.e. pulse oximetry, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)) and tissue perfusion (i.e. femoral pulse strength, urine output, blood pressure). There are no publications which systematically and concurrently assess these trends during this hemodynamic transition, and as such, there are no agreed upon thresholds to alert clinicians that a developing AAO is causing impaired tissue perfusion/oxygenation. Exploration of traditional measures of tissue oxygenation may prove more sensitive and specific at identifying compromise in newborns with critical AAO. For example, certain pulse oximetry waveform characteristics (photoplethysmography, PPG) have shown differences in healthy newborns versus those with CoA. Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) is another validated non-invasive method that assesses peripheral tissue oxygenation in neonates and has been shown to correlate well with invasive markers of tissue oxygenation. The investigators and others have utilized RRS in healthy neonates and in animals to detect tissue hypoperfusion. To test the hypothesis that a validated MHDC process that combines commonly used non-invasive monitoring tools, new components of these traditional tools, and RRS, will have improved sensitivity in detecting critical impairments to tissue oxygen delivery in newborns with suspected critical AAO, the investigators identified the following aims:

Aim I: To assess the reliability of currently deployed non-invasive markers of tissue oxygenation/perfusion (femoral pulse strength, pre- vs. post- ductal blood pressure and saturation gradient, cerebral/renal NIRS, and urine output) in identifying a critical AAO that will need intervention in the newborn period.

Aim II: To explore the sensitivity of PPG to identify critical AAO requiring intervention in the newborn period.

Aim III: To determine the feasibility of assessing oxygen utilization at the tissue level based on RRS during MHDC and examine its predictive capability in identifying those infants with AAO who will require arch intervention in the newborn period.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Infants with prenatal or postnatal echocardiographic findings concerning for or diagnostic of aortic arch obstruction admitted to the BCH CICU.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with echocardiography-based possible or definite aortic arch obstruction and <1 month postnatal age admitted to the CICU
  • Clinical team assent to approach family, (3) parent/guardian informed consent. Inclusion criteria includes infants with concurrent other congenital heart disease, or simple Coarctation of the aorta or arch hypoplasia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known carrier status for resistant organisms. Resistant organisms are defined as MRSA and VRE.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with arch or CoA repair
Time Frame: First 3 postnatal months
Surgical or catheter-based repair of the aortic arch or coarctation of the aorta
First 3 postnatal months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with echocardiographic finding of aortic arch obstruction
Time Frame: First 3 postnatal months
Echocardiographic finding of aortic arch obstruction defined as blunted doppler in the descending aorta or presence of pathognomonic characteristic of CoA such as clear posterior shelf
First 3 postnatal months
Number of participants with end organ damage as evidence by necrotizing enterocolitis, or acute kidney injury in the first three postnatal months
Time Frame: First 3 postnatal months
Necrotizing enterocolitis will be defined as the presence of pneumatosis intestinalis as documented in an attending-read radiology report. Acute kidney injury will be defined per modified neonatal KDIGO guidelines of stage I or greater AKI (serum creatinine SCr rise of greater than 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or SCr rise greater than 1.5-1.9x baseline SCr within 7 days) or if no creatinine data are present for the patient, then using urine output criteria of less than or equal to 1 ml/kg/hr of urine output for 24 hours.
First 3 postnatal months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Kheir, MD, Boston Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coarctation of the Aorta

Clinical Trials on Monitoring using resonance Raman spectroscopy, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and near-infrared spectroscopy

Subscribe