Nexus of Risk: Sexual Assault, Alcohol Use, and Risky Sex Among College Women

April 1, 2024 updated by: Elizabeth Yeater, University of New Mexico

Nexus of Risk: Examining Sexual Assault, Alcohol Use, and Risky Sex Among College Women Through a Smartphone Application

Sexual assault on college campuses has reached epidemic proportions, yet the etiological variables responsible for violence against women in these contexts remain unclear. Work on the situational precipitants of sexual assault has relied primarily on women's retrospective accounts, but research has shown that autobiographical memory is plagued by error. This study will use Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to obtain a better understanding of the contextual determinants of sexual assault, as well as the co-occurrence of victimization, risky sex, and substance use. These findings will inform the development of an Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) that will provide college women with personalized feedback about their level of risk for victimization and related adverse events. The effectiveness of EMA/EMI in decreasing rates of sexual assault, risky sexual behavior, and substance use then will be evaluated relative to an EMA-only and an assessment-only control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sexual assault is a significant public health problem. The sequelae of victimization involve both mental and physical health problems (Bedard-Gilligan et al., 2011; Hughes et al., 2010), and once victimized, women are at significant increased risk for revictimization (Classen et al., 2005; Messman-Moore & Long, 2003). Sexual assault has reached epidemic proportions on college campuses, with undergraduate women reporting high rates of victimization (Krebs et al., 2007). Alcohol use is intimately intertwined with sexual violence (Abbey, 2011), as well as high-risk sexual behavior (Scott-Sheldon et al., 2010). Work on the situational precipitants of sexual assault has relied primarily on women's retrospective accounts, even though autobiographical memory is plagued by error (Bradburn et al., 1987).

One way to obtain ecologically valid observations of these precipitants may be through Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). EMA data are collected in near realtime and are considered to have greater validity than retrospective accounts (Shiffman et al., 2008). The primary aim of this study will be to use EMA to obtain a better understanding of the contextual determinants of sexual assault, as well as the co-occurrence of victimization, risky sex, and substance use. This basic work then will inform the development of an Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) for college women to reduce their risk. EMI would permit an opportunity to intervene prior to and during high-risk situations by providing women with personalized feedback about their level of risk for victimization and related adverse events. The secondary aim of this study will be to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of EMA/EMI, relative to EMA-only and an assessment only control group, in decreasing rates of sexual assault, risky sexual behavior, and substance use. This RCT will be prospective in design and target women who are at increased risk for assault (freshman). If supported, this work would offer college campuses a cost-effective, easily disseminated approach to preventing assault and other adverse consequences.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

183

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Elizabeth Yeater, PhD
  • Phone Number: (505) 277-0632
  • Email: eyeater@unm.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Katie Witkiewitz, PhD
  • Phone Number: 505-277-4121
  • Email: katiew@unm.edu

Study Locations

    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
        • Logan Hall

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) being between the ages of 18-24, as women younger than 25 are at highest risk for victimization (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2001); (2) being unmarried and interested in dating opposite sex partners, as the tasks given at baseline describe situations that unmarried, heterosexual, or bisexual college women might face when interacting socially with men; (3) being a binge drinker, defined by SAMHSA as having at least 4 drinks on one occasion in the past month, since drinking heavily (Testa et al., 2010) increases women's risk for victimization; (4) having engaged in sexual intercourse at least once, as these women will likely be at increased risk relative to non-sexually active women; and (5) being able to use a smartphone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who fail to meet all eligibility requirements listed above, or who report an AUDIT score greater than 16 or elevated mood symptoms are excluded from participating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: EMA-only Condition
To examine situational precipitants of sexual assault, risky sexual behavior, and substance-use among freshman women (N=100) using EMA for 6 weeks. To examine within- and between-persons factors that may influence the relationships among these situational precipitants and adverse consequences.
Other: Focus Group
To gather preliminary research about the feasibility of an EMI sexual assault intervention prior to an experimental condition. A small group of freshman women (N=20) will participate in an EMI protocol for six weeks, followed by providing feedback about their experience, including issues with phrasing, technical issues, and convenience.
Participants will receive hypothetical and real-time behavioral feedback using a smartphone application which provides ecological momentary responses to their current behaviors. By providing safety tips and advice, the intervention may decrease incidences of sexual assault and risky sex compared to a control group.
Experimental: EMA/EMI Condition
To examine whether an EMA/EMI condition, relative to an EMA-only and a minimal assessment-only condition, decreases incidents of sexual assault, risky sexual behavior, and alcohol use among freshman women (N=288). It is hypothesized that the 6-week EMA/EMI condition, relative to the other conditions, will be associated with lower rates of assault, risky sexual sex, and substance use from baseline to a 6-month followup.
Participants will receive hypothetical and real-time behavioral feedback using a smartphone application which provides ecological momentary responses to their current behaviors. By providing safety tips and advice, the intervention may decrease incidences of sexual assault and risky sex compared to a control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual Experiences Survey
Time Frame: Six Weeks
Measures victimization at a six month follow-up
Six Weeks
The Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index
Time Frame: Six Weeks
The RAPI is a 23-item questionnaire developed specifically to evaluate alcohol-related problems of adolescents. The measure has high internal consistency, with alpha = .92 in a sample of adolescents from 12 to 21.
Six Weeks
Sexual Risk Measure
Time Frame: Six Weeks
The SRM was developed by Consultant Bryan (Schmiege et al., 2009) and measures condom use, frequency of intercourse, and sexual behavior under the influence of alcohol. A risky sex index is calculated such that higher scores indicate riskier sexual behavior.
Six Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use

Clinical Trials on Ecological Momentary Intervention

3
Subscribe