Analgesic Efficacy of Different Volumes in Erector Spinae Plane Block in Single Level Lumbar Spine Fixation

October 8, 2023 updated by: Mohamed Fouad Algyar, Kafrelsheikh University

Analgesic Efficacy of Different Volumes in Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Single Level Lumbar Spine Fixation: A Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

The analgesic efficacy of different volumes in ESPB patients undergoing single-level lumbar spine fixation

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) its an interfacial plane block for an effective treatment for thoracic neuropathic pain. Currently, compared to the use of opioids, the ESPB has fewer side effects and is safe for patients of all ages having abdominal and thoracic operations .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kafrelsheikh
      • Kafr Ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt, 33516
        • Kafrelsheikh University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-65 years.
  2. Both genders.
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status I or II.
  4. Undergoing single level lumbar spine fixation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Pregnant females.
  3. Renal, lung, heart, or liver disorders.
  4. Communication difficulties which might prevent a reliable postoperative assessment.
  5. Contraindication to regional anesthesia (bleeding disorder, use of any anticoagulants, local infection, known allergy to local anesthetics).
  6. BMI more than 30 kg/m2.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erector 10
Received 10ml of preoperative bilateral ultrasound guided ESPB by bupivacaine 0.25% on each side
Bilateral ultrasound guided in erector spinae plane block by bupivacaine 0.25%
Experimental: Erector 15
Received 15ml of preoperative bilateral ultrasound guided ESPB by bupivacaine 0.25% on each side
Bilateral ultrasound guided in erector spinae plane block by bupivacaine 0.25%
Experimental: Erector 20
Received 20ml of preoperative bilateral ultrasound guided ESPB by bupivacaine 0.25% on each side
Bilateral ultrasound guided in erector spinae plane block by bupivacaine 0.25%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total morphine consumption
Time Frame: First 24 hours postoperatively
Patients were allowed to receive incremental doses of morphine 3mg intravenously if numerical rating scale pain score will be ≥ then the total amount of morphine will be recorded
First 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical rating scale
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Postoperative pain using numerical rating scale (NRS) will be measured at post-anesthesia care unit, from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing maximum intolerable pain
Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Time to the first rescue analgesic
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively
If numerical rating scale >4 was observed, rescue analgesia (morphine 3 mg IV) was administered
Up to 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively
postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 20% of baseline readings and was managed by ephedrine 5 mg IV and/or normal saline IVI), bradycardia (heart rate < 60 beats/min and was managed by atropine 0.6 mg IV).
Up to 24 hours postoperatively
5-point scale
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours postoperative
The degree of patient satisfaction was assessed on a 5-point scale: (0= extremely dissatisfied, 1= unsatisfied, 2= neither satisfied nor unsatisfied, 3= satisfied), and 4= extremely satisfied).
Up to 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution

Subscribe