Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Children

May 29, 2023 updated by: Tania Vanhée, Université Libre de Bruxelles
To be able to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in a patient, polysomnography (PSG) remains the gold standard. However, this is expensive, involves a considerable workload and is quite complex. Additionally, the wait time from when the patient was referred for PSG to when it is done can take up to 5-6 months. Simpler screening tools have therefore been developed, such as questionnaires. The questionnaires are subjective tools completed by the parents based on the observation of the child's sleep, behavioral problems, etc. These questionnaires have shown usefulness in sorting out patients to be referred to a sleep specialist, an Oto-Rhino-Laryngologist (ENT) or an orthodontist before performing a PSG in view of the difficulty of access to it. The Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) is a tool that was developed by Chervin and his colleagues to screen children with OSAS. This questionnaire is a reliable and scientifically validated tool. In addition, the PSQ is the most accurate questionnaire from a screening point of view. However, the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) considers that the questionnaires, among others, the PSQ, are not sensitive enough to detect OSAS in a child. They offer an anamnesis as well as a clinical examination to be carried out in addition to the few questions taken from the PSQ that they consider useful for screening patients at risk. The investigators can therefore ask themselves the following question: "Is the PSQ sufficient on its own or do the investigators obtain better results when the investigators carry out a complete anamnesis as well as a clinical examination? "

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

  1. Bibliographic research methodology

    In order to have a relevant bibliographic base, the investigators selected articles with a high level of evidence and the most recent.

    For this, the investigators carried out their research on the following sites and databases: Pubmed, Sciences Direct, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Tripdatabase and Cible +.

    Several research equations have allowed us to have satisfactory results. When the results were too broad, the investigators restricted their search to meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The following keywords were used: "Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire", "dentistry", "sleep apnea", "child", "surveys and questionnaires", "sleep apnea, obstructive", "diagnosis accuracy"

    The most relevant articles that allowed them to establish the research question were found on Pubmed and Sciences Direct. (appendix n°1) Concerning Google Scholar, Tripdatabase and Cible +, the articles found were either already selected articles or were not sufficiently targeted on the subject.

  2. Agreement of the ethics committee

    The study is a prospective observational study carried out within the Erasmus HUB site and therefore required the approval of its ethics committee. The required documents were introduced on the DycoFlow platform on August 31, 2022. They gave their agreement to submit my request to the ethics committee on September 20, 2022. The Erasmus ethics committee gave its agreement on September 9, 2022. December 2022.

  3. Study methodology

I. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The investigators decided to limit the study to children aged 2 to 8 years. Indeed, interceptive orthodontic treatment must be performed before the 9th birthday to be reimbursed if necessary. Moreover, if ENT surgery is necessary (tonsillectomy for example), it is advantageous to perform it as soon as possible. quickly as possible to avoid the long-term consequences of mouth breathing. The investigators also excluded patients whose parents did not speak French.

I. Objective of the study

The study will therefore consist in comparing the results using on the one hand the PSQ only, on the other hand the clinical examination and the anamnesis as well as the three together and see if the results are comparable.

II. Realization of questionnaires

  • Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire translated into French (validated translation)
  • Anamnesis
  • Clinical examination

Concerning the anamnesis and the clinical examination, the investigators based themselves on the recommendations given by the AAPD. Indeed, some studies have shown that the questionnaire gives better results when combined with a clinical examination.

III. Data collection

The study took place within the Erasmus site HUB, at the Erasmus Medical Center (EMC) during pediatric dentistry consultations.

The parents of the patients were approached from the beginning of the consultation in order to integrate the study. Oral explanations concerning the purpose and conduct of the study were given in addition to informed consent. In addition, the children also received appropriate informed consent explaining the course of the study if the age and maturity of the child permitted it.

The PSQ and the anamnesis are carried out during the consultation with the parent. Once the consultation is over, the clinical examination is carried out with the consent of the child.

If the PSQ turned out to be positive, i.e. the child obtained a score equal to or greater than 7 positive responses out of 22, a liaison letter was sent to refer the child to an ENT specialist. The investigators also asked for an e-mail report of the consultation. This was also the case for the anamnesis and the clinical examination.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
        • Recruiting
        • Tania Vanhée
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients between 2 and 8 years old presenting to the pediatric dentistry consultation at Erasmus Hospital,EMC site, speaking French and agreeing to participate in the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- 2-8 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not speak French

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) +
Patient who obtained a score of 7 or more on the PSQ
The investigators compare the results of the PSQ alone with the elements provided by the clinical examination regarding the referral of patients to the Otolaryngologist (ENT) consultation.
Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) -
Patient who obtained a PSQ score less than 7

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PSQ + or -
Time Frame: The data collection is carried out during the consultation
Patient positive or negative on Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ)
The data collection is carried out during the consultation
History/clinical examination + or -
Time Frame: The data collection is carried out during the consultation
Patient positive or negative at History/clinical examination
The data collection is carried out during the consultation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fairouz Ben Abdelouahed, Directrice du service de Dentisterie HUB

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on a clinical examination and anamnesis

Subscribe